Re: AI 일대 일 영어 토론 연습 사례 (예시)

[Young]

아래 내용은 초중급 레벨 사용자의 AI 음성 토론 연습 내용입니다.

전부 음성으로 진행되며, 화면에 텍스트도 보여줍니다.

끝나고 꼭 텍스트 전체 복사 저장해서 따로 공부하세요^^

(테스트 진행이라 답변 내용보다는 진행 형식만 참고하시기 바랍니다) 

사용자의 수준에 따라 약간씩 다른 형태의 진행이 이루어집니다. 

* 토픽: 한국의 의대 증원에 따른 갈등 문제

(AI가 처음에 토론 진행 계획을 텍스트로 보여주고, 말해줍니다)

Background: The government of South Korea recently announced a plan to increase the number of medical students by 4,000 over the next decade, a move that sparked severe backlash from doctors in the country. The plan is aimed at ensuring better health services in rural areas, which have been under-served historically. The medical community, however, argues that the move is politically motivated and will not solve the underlying issues of the healthcare system. As a result, many doctors and medical students have gone on strike in protest against the policy.

Basic Discussion Questions:

1. What is the reason behind the increase in medical schools in Korea by the government?
2. What are the medical community's objections to this increase in medical schools?
3. How do you perceive the doctors' strike due to the increase in medical schools?
4. What could potentially be the consequences of this move in terms of healthcare services?

In-Depth Discussion Questions:

1. If you believe the doctor's strike is justified, what alternative solutions can you suggest the government should have taken instead of increasing the medical schools?
2. How could this decision of increasing medical schools impact the quality of medical education in Korea?
3. Considering both the government's and doctors' viewpoint, can we foresee any positive impacts with the enforcement of this policy?
4. What effects might this move have on doctors' working conditions, rural healthcare, and the medical industry in general?

(AI가 토론 계획 끝 부분에 첫번째 질문부터 순서대로 물어봅니다)

Given the detail of the task, let's start with the first basic discussion question: What is the reason behind the increase in medical schools in Korea by the government?

05:11 (사용자의 첫번째 답변)

Korean government foresee the need of medical doctors in a few decades, because over the 20 years, there is no increase of medical doctors number. Korean people are getting older and older, and many sick people will arise in a few decades. So medical staff, Korean government think medical staff should be increased right now.

05:14 (첫번째 답변에 대한 코멘트 후 두번쨰 질문을 물어봅니다) 

Thank you for your enlightening response. Your point is that the Korean government foresees an increase in the need for medical practitioners in the coming decades due to the ageing population. It's clear then that their intent is to boost the number of doctors by expanding medical education currently.

Now, let us move on to the next question. What are the medical community's objections to this increase in medical schools?

05:14 (두번째 사용자 답변)
Medical communities, including medical doctors, object the plan of government without considering the impact on our society.

05:17 (두번째 답변에 대한 코멘트후 세번째 질문)

Your answer suggests that the medical community is opposed to the government's plan primarily because they believe that the government did not adequately consider the societal implications of the decision.
Moving on to our next question: How do you perceive the doctors' strike due to the increase in medical schools?

05:17 (세번째 사용자 답변)
Medical communities, including medical doctors, object the plan of government without considering the impact on our society.

05:40 (세번째 답변에 대한 코멘트 후 네번째 질문)
It seems like there has been a bit of a misunderstanding. Your previous response was repeated for a new question. This time you were asked about your personal perceptions on the doctors' strike due to an increase in medical schools. Could you please provide your thoughts on the matter?

05:40 
What does it mean, perceived?
05:42
When we say "perceive," we're asking about your personal viewpoint or opinion. In this context, I'm requesting your thoughts on the doctors' strike and its implications, or how you feel about it. Your understanding, feelings or thoughts on the doctors' strike due to an increase in the number of medical schools is what is being asked. Could you please share your thoughts on the subject?
05:42 (네번째 답변)

I think we need to increase the number of medical doctors at this time. I think we need to discuss with all parties, all related parties, and we need to find out a gradual and sophisticated solution.

05:43 (네번째 답변에 대한 코멘트 후 첫번째 심층 토론 질문)

Thank you for your opinion. From your viewpoint, you believe it is necessary to increase the number of medical doctors, but in a manner that includes discussions with all affected parties. This implies that a gradual and multifaceted solution would be more beneficial for the society.
Now let's approach our last basic question: What could potentially be the consequences of this move in terms of healthcare services?

05:44
I think that increase of medical factors could affect on many side, so we need to eval‎uate the effect of number of medical factors, and then we need to find out special solution.
05:46
Thank you for your input. In your view, increasing the number of medical practitioners could have wide-ranging impacts. Therefore, it is important to eval‎uate these potential effects carefully and meticulously to discern a suitable resolution.
Let's dive deeper into the topic with our in-depth discussion questions. If you believe the doctors' strike is justified, what alternative solutions can you suggest the government should have taken instead of increasing the medical schools?

05:46
I think the government should discuss with all parties, all related parties.
05:47
Thanks for your answer. You seem to suggest that the government should engage in comprehensive discussion with all relevant stakeholders as an alternative to unilaterally making a decision to increase medical schools. This would ensure that any resulting policy is reflective of a wide range of perspectives.
Moving on, how could this decision of increasing medical schools impact the quality of medical education in Korea?

05:47
In a short term, they feel the lack of facility for educating medical freshmen. But as the years go on, the system will be settled. Because we have a good experience, a better experience of operating the medical system than other countries.
05:49
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. You believe that in the short term, there might be difficulties due to lack of adequate facilities for the influx of new medical students. However, you express confidence that Korea, with its rich experience in operating the medical system, will eventually adapt and manage the situation over the long run.
Now let's move to the next question. Considering both the government's and doctors' viewpoints, can we foresee any positive impacts with the enforcement of this policy?

05:49
I think the enforcement of this policy impact positive effect and negative effect on our society. I think positive effect is more than negative effect because the lack of medical staff and doctors is definitive.
05:51
Thank you for your input. You seem to hold the perspective that the implementation of this policy could possibly have both positive and negative influences on Korean society. However, you believe that the positive impact might outweigh the negative, mainly due to the current definite shortage of medical staff and doctors.
Now, onto our last question: What effects might this move have on doctors' working conditions, rural healthcare, and the medical industry in general?

05:51
I think the starting doctors had a hard time to train for training for over 5 years, but after increase of medical doctors, that kind of problems will be solved and another medical system's problems will be solved in a few days.
05:53
 Thank you for your answer. You're suggesting that while doctors in the beginning stages of their career might face challenges due to the increased training period, the rise in the number of medical professionals could eventually help to alleviate such issues. This would, in turn, contribute to the resolution of other existing problems within the medical system.

(최종 평가 및 피드백)

Now, let's move to the eval‎uation phase. I will correct your sentences and provide comprehensive feedback on our discussion. 

Here are the corrections:

From: "Korean government foresee the need of medical doctors in a few decades, because over the 20 years, there is no increase of medical doctors number." To: "The Korean government foresees the need for more medical doctors in a few decades because there has been no increase in the number of doctors over the past 20 years."

From: "Medical communities, including medical doctors, object the plan of government without considering the impact on our society." To: "The medical community, which includes doctors, objects to the government’s plan, arguing that it hasn’t adequately considered the impact on our society."

From: "What does it mean, perceived?" To: "What does 'perceive' mean?"

From: "I think we need to increase the number of medical doctors at this time." To: "I believe it's necessary to increase the number of medical doctors right now."

From: "I think that increase of medical factors could affect on many side." To: "I believe that an increase in the number of medical professionals could have multiple diverse effects."

From: "In a short term, they feel the lack of facility for educating medical freshmen." To: "In the short term, there might be a lack of adequate facilities for educating the new medical students."

(종합 평가)

Your English is signifcantly proficient, but there are some areas that could be improved. For instance, grammar and sentence structure to ensure that your ideas are conveyed more clearly. The conversation flowed smoothly overall, demonstrating your ability to understand and respond to complex issues related to healthcare policies and their implications, which highlights your excellent analytical and critical thinking skills. However, we recommend that you expand on your ideas further when answering questions to provide a more rounded perspective on the issue at hand. Additionally, make sure to use the correct terminology and phrases when stating your thoughts to enhance your expression‎ and make it more engaging. To conclude, your performance in this discussion showed us that you're capable of speaking on complicated topics with confidence. Keep it up!