https://news.usni.org/2022/07/11/f-35a-purchase-raises-questions-over-south-korean-aircraft-carrier-program-says-expert
https://papago.naver.net/website?source=en&target=ko&url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.usni.org%2F2022%2F07%2F11%2Ff-35a-purchase-raises-questions-over-south-korean-aircraft-carrier-program-says-expert (파파고 번역)
김재엽 성균관대 연구원이라는 분의 인터뷰인데, 전 정부는 한국 국방의 초점을 확대하기 위해, 구체적으로 일본과의 무역분쟁 및 동해에서의 충돌 이후 이즈모급의 F-35B 운영 개수안에 대응해 자체 항모 보유를 추진했다고 합니다.
반면 현 정부는 대북한 억지력을 강화하기를 원해 F-35A 추가구매를 원하고 있고요.
해군이 경항모 보유의 명분으로 일본과의 갈등을 내세운 적은 최소한 공식적으론 없던 것 같은데 실제 추진 동력이 저랬다면 한일관계는 5년 동안 정말 심각할 정도로 파탄났었네요.
F-35A Purchase Raises Questions Over South Korean Aircraft Carrier Program - USNI News
View all posts by Tim Fish →
5-6 minutes
Republic of Korea Navy CVX carrier concept. RoK Navy Image
South Korea is expected to purchase 20 new F-35A Block 4 Lightning II stealth fighters for the Republic of Korea Air Force (RoKAF) – raising questions about the future of the South Korean aircraft carrier program.
A decision is expected to be announced later this month, according to local media reports, with the aircraft slated to be introduced no earlier than mid-2020s. But these plans indicate a wider shift in the defense posture of South Korea and signals a change in the threat priorities as viewed from Seoul.
There is speculation that the advance of the F-35A project will come at the expense of Republic of Korea Navy (RoKN) plans for the procurement of a 30,000t light aircraft carrier – dubbed CVX – and a similar accompanying number of about 20 F-35B variant short take-off and vertical landing aircraft.
The stealthy F-35As for the RoKAF are designed to be used as pre-emptive strike and counter-strike assets that will target North Korean military installations and nuclear weapon launch facilities and storage sites. This brings the focus on potential threats directly on the Korean Peninsula and South Korea’s unstable neighbor. The RoKAF already has 40 F-35A Block 3 aircraft in-service.
Meanwhile, a light carrier is designed for operations against more distant threats in support of expeditionary operations further away from South Korea. The decision to buy the F-35As will likely mean a delay in the procurement of CVX. Both sets of aircraft are estimated to cost about $3 billion.
The change in priorities is a result of the recent change in government in Seoul, where, following elections in March, President Yoon Suk-yeol, from the People’s Power party, replaced the former President Moon Jae-in, from the Democratic Party of Korea.
Kim Jae Yeop, a defense and senior researcher at Sungkyun Institute for Global Strategy (SIGS), Sungkyunkwan University told USNI News that CVX had been a “landmark project” for Moon “who actively sought to expand the focus of Korea’s defense modernization beyond threats from Pyongyang.”
Two F-35A Lightning IIs from the 354th Fighter Wing, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, depart from a KC-135 Stratotanker assigned to the 117th Air Refueling Squadron, Forbes Field Air National Guard Base, Kansas, over the Indo-Pacific, March 10, 2022. US Air Force Photo
Kim explained that one of the driving forces behind this expansion was to enable the RoKN to stand up to Japan following trade disputes and a naval clash in the East Sea in 2019. Moon wanted the navy to have its own carrier to confront the naval power of Japan after it decided to convert its two Izumo-class helicopter carriers into light carriers.
As a result, South Korea invested in Aegis-capable destroyers, new classes of submarine and a pair of Landing Platform Helicopter (LPH) amphibious assault ships over the past two decades.
Yoon seems to have very different priorities for defense modernization.
“His government believes that bolstering deterrence on Pyongyang’s growing arsenal of weapons of mass destruction including nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, is more important and urgent,” Kim said.
That would mean the F-35A decision is the better option, Kim said. However, the RoKAF is limited by older aircraft.
The RoKAF has more than 400 aircraft in its inventory, but these include more than 100 1970s- and 1980s-vintage F-4 Phantom and F-5 fighters.
“These fighters are blamed for the loss of air force pilots due to a number of flight accidents,” Kim said.
These will be replaced with the introduction of indigenously built aircraft the KF-21 from 2026 and FA-50 light combat fighter as well as the F-35, he said.
The CVX decision has been controversial since its announcement in the Mid-Term Defence Plan (MTDP) 2021-2025 published in 2020. It is the centrepiece of the RoKN’s ambition to become a blue water navy. It failed secure funding, despite a memorandum of understanding signed in October 2021 between Korean Aerospace Industries and Hyundai Heavy Industries to design and develop CVX.
Kim said he believes that because it was assumed CVX would conduct operations in and around the Korean Peninsula, such as along the littorals of North Korea or near disputed islands like Dokdo (or Liancourt Rocks), it was not the best use of an expensive asset when alternatives were available.
The RoKN will likely need to highlight the advantage of a light aircraft carrier in order to have more support for the program, Kim said.
“This includes CVX’s contribution to multinational missions with the U.S. Navy and other regional allies and partners,” he said. “In this case, the CVX may carry out a greater role in dealing with the maritime threat from China, rather than Japan.”
첫댓글 독도 근처로 일본이 이즈모를 끌고 와서 시위하면 우리도 항모 보내 대치해야 한다는 것은 참 유치한 논리인데요...
전세계 어느 누구도 항모를 그런 식으로 쓰지는 않죠.
1) 장기적인 국가전략 없이 말씀대로 유치한 논리에 의거해 장비획득이 이뤄지거나,
2) 각 조직의 필요에 맞춘 장비 획득 프로그램들 중 오야의 구미, 혹은 그때그때 상황변화에 맞춘 유치한 논리에 끼워맞추는 데 성공한 일부가 승인되거나 하는 게 아닌가 싶은...
항모 건조는 당연히 조선소에서 할 거고, 그 소재지를 보면 새 정부라도 이미 건드리기 어려운 이권이 되지 않았나 싶습니다.
지금 구도는 해군이 해군 예산으로 항모 만들면 함재기는 공군이 공군 예산으로 사다가 올리라는 공군 입장에서 보면 '날강도(?)' 구도이니 중간 타협점으로 해군은 원하는 배를 만들고 함재기는 나중에 천천히 마련한다는 식으로 배만 덜렁 만드는 꼴이 나지 않을까 싶네요.
@백선호 KF-21 해군형이 올라가는 건가요!? 뭐.. 독도함도 만들고 10년 가까이 행사함으로 굴려봤었으니..
@위종민 Nobody knows죵. 터키처럼 싼 무인기로 왕창 올리자는 주장이 나온다면...??? ㅋㅋ