I just thought the answer was that's why quantum mechanics called as quantum mechanics.
In Atom the classcal mechanics doesn't work instead everything is quantized. I accepted it.
But why does a free electron radiate even not a electron in atom?
If we move a electron with a constant speed in vacuum its electric fields spread out uniformly.
At any instant If we accelerate it its electric fields have many kinks spreading out. That is
the electromagnetic waves. Let's assume there is a positive charge just above a moving
electron in stationary. Maybe the kinks could be spread out although I don't know how much
it could be. In electrostatics we know the electric fields produced by both a positive charge
and a negative charge with a distance r. It's different with a electric field produced by a free
negative charge. Let's assume agin what could be happened when a electron rotates
a proton. I think the kinks could be spread out a little bit but I don't know how much.
Who knows? All kinks could be removed in this case. No kinks no radiation. So we don't have radiation in atoms. Am I radical? There could be kinks in atom? Does it depend on it's velocity?
If there will be kinks is it quantized? One more In case of a free electron accelerating Is the radiation quantized in terms of its acceleration?
* Could you give me anything about this?
첫댓글 because of quantum mechanics specification.... in atom, for example Hydrogen, there is no radiation. if there has any radiation, clearly, electron energy has dissipation. and electron running to nucleus. so we postulated at this condition... in the Bohr's medel..
standing wave of de Broglie's material wave. such as oscillating rod in standing wave.. 2πr=nλ...it's semi-classical, but starts of quantum mechanics.... ..... thanks for reading this poor writings. please, understand ..sentence grammar error..
뜨아...