A
vessel built by Hyundai Heavy Industries / Courtesy of Hyundai Heavy Industries
By Nam Hyun-woo
Hyundai
Heavy Industries Holdings CEO Kwon Oh-gap
Hyundai Heavy
Industries (HHI) plans to acquire Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering
(DSME) to help enhance its global competitiveness and prevent dumping among
local shipbuilders, industry analysts said Thursday.
As DSME's largest stakeholder Korea Development Bank (KDB) decided to hand over
its stake to HHI in return for a share in an envisioned merged firm, it said
HHI's financial burden has lowered, but controversy may stir over DSME's true
corporate value and KDB's failure to pay back taxpayers' money.
According to Korea Development Bank (KDB), the state-run lender signed an MOU
with HHI over selling the shipbuilder its 55.7 percent stake in DSME.
Under the deal, KDB will hand over its DSME stocks to a new corporate body that
will be set up by HHI. In return, the lender will receive the new body's stocks
worth 2.1 trillion won.
"The M&A deal came after HHI and KDB both recognized the necessity to
reform the shipbuilding industry," KDB Chairman Lee Dong-gull said.
"We took this measure to avoid both DSME and HHI from suffering deeper
financial troubles."
Lee added the bank will remain as the No. 2 stakeholder in the new body and
collect its investment in the long term.
If HHI and KDB reach a final deal, it will lead to a merger between two of the
world's top shipbuilders, depending on the portion of the traded stake.
According to market tracker Clarksons Research, HHI Group has 11,145
compensated gross tonnage (CGT) in its backlog at the end of last year,
followed by DSME with 5,844 CGT. CGT is an indicator of the amount of work
required to build a ship.
If the two companies merge, their combined backlog of 16,989 CGT will be three
times greater than that of No. 3 shipbuilder Imabari Shipbuilding of Japan with
5253 CGT, meaning HHI can consolidate its status as the world's leading
shipbuilder.
The move came amid growing calls for reforming the domestic shipbuilding
industry from the current big three companies ― HHI, DSME and Samsung Heavy
Industries ― to two firms. DSME CEO Jung Sung-leep has also supported the idea,
calling the big two structure "desirable."
HHI and DSME have similar portfolios comprised of liquefied natural gas (LNG)
ships, very large crude carriers (VLCCs) and naval vessels. If the two
companies are merged, those overlapping businesses could be reorganized for
better efficiency.
"Ultimately, the restructuring into the big two structure will prevent
shipbuilders' chronic oversupply and cutthroat competition between the three
firms," SK Securities analyst Yoo Seong-woo said.
"However, the merger can pose adverse impact on HHI and its investors,
because the value of DSME shares can be seen as inflated because of its
perpetual bond."
Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine
Engineering CEO Jung Sung-leep
At the end of the
third quarter last year, DSME's equity amounts to 3.6 trillion won and 2.3
trillion won of them is perpetual bond, which refers to bonds with no maturity
date. Though bonds are an instrument showing the issuer's indebtedness,
perpetual bonds are treated as an equity, not a debt, because it does not
require the issuer to redeem the principal.
"The current DSME share price is based on the recognition its perpetual
bond is an equity," Yoo said. "When we count the bond as a debt,
buying DSME at around 2 trillion won is too expensive."
Reflecting such a view, the shares of HHI Holdings, the group's holding firm,
were trading at 357,000 won as of 1:30 p.m., Thursday, down 4.93 percent from a
day earlier. HHI also declined by 2.77 percent to 140,500 won, down 2.77
percent.
KB Securities analyst Kim Se-yong added that an M&A between companies
leading an industry generally requires major governments' consent, due to
antitrust issues. "The fact that DSME has received aid from the Korean
government could be a major talking point in drawing consent from other
countries," he said.
The acquisition is also drawing backlash from HHI union members. The union said
that it decided to postpone a vote on their salary negotiation with the
management until it can confirm the impact on its members.
"When the company acquires DSME, the stability of overlapping jobs is
threatened, negatively impacting members' working conditions," the union
said. "It is unreasonable that the company is spending a fortune to
acquire a large company, even though it carried out massive restructuring
citing aggravated management conditions."