EPL 심판 회장 Keith Hackett에 의하면 네덜란드 1번쨰 골은 오프사이드가 아니다

[착돌붕어㈜]

BBC에서 기사 접해서 퍼왓는데요 간략히 번역해보자면

반니스텔루이가 오프사이드 판정이 안된이유가 파누치가

네덜란드선수랑 넘어져서 피치밖에 나가서 안들어오고 뒹굴고있엇는데 이것을 active 로 판정했다네요

부심의 결정은 사실적으로 놓고봤을대 분명히 맞았다네요 수비수가 슬라이딩해서 필드밖으로 나가더라고

그래도 active로 판정된다네요 그래서 파누치가 그 게임안에 속해있는걸로 결정이된대요

뿐만아니라 UEFA 장관인지 총서기 인지 David Taylor 라는 사람도 부심의 결정이 전적으로 맞았다고 동의

그사람의 인터뷰에 의하면 그골에대한 사람들의 이해력이 부족했다고 그래서 어떤 해설자들은 완전이

오프사이드라고 불러됐지만 그것은 명백히 틀린거라고

대충 정리해보자면 오프사이드 목적과 룰에의하면 파누치는 위치는 경기에 관련되있다고 그러네요

 

Sport Homepage

 

Football

 

Euro 2008

Schedule and statistics

Video archive

Austria

Croatia

Czech Rep

France

Germany

Greece

Italy

Netherlands

Poland

Portugal

Romania

Russia

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

Turkey

Related BBC sites

• News
• Weather

Site Version

• UK Version
• International Version
• About the versions

Page last updated at 12:05 GMT, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 13:05 UK

E-mail this to a friend

Printable version

Dutch goal correct says ref chief

Watch Ruud van Nistelrooy's controversial goal

By Andrew McKenzie

Dutch striker Ruud van Nistelrooy's opening goal in the win over Italy was legitimate, says Premier League referees' chief Keith Hackett.

Van Nistelrooy looked yards offside when he prodded home from close range.

But it appears he was played onside by defender Christian Panucci, who was lying off the pitch at the time.

"The fact is the assistant was correct; the defender who slid off the field is still regarded as active," Hackett told BBC Sport.

"Christian Panucci went off through contact with his own goalkeeper (Gianluigi) Buffon. He is still considered part of the game."

Uefa general secretary David Taylor said Swedish referee Peter Frojdfeldt and his assistant Stefan Wittberg were absolutely correct in their interpretation.

He told a news conference: "There is a lack of understanding as to why this particular goal was awarded. In fact some television commentators have insisted the goal was clearly offside, but that is not the case.

Dirk Kuyt on Van Nistelrooy's goal

"The player was not offside because in addition to the goalkeeper there was another Italian player in front of the goalscorer. Even though he had fallen off the pitch his position was still relevant for the purposes of the offside law.

"Not many people, even in the game, and I include the players, know this interpretation."

Van Nistelrooy stuck out a leg to poke home a Giovanni van Bronckhorst shot, after Italy had initially cleared the ball.

Italy's players were furious with the decision and even the Dutch delayed their celebrations until they were sure the goal had been given.

Italy striker Luca Toni, who was booked for protesting, said: "I looked at the replay during the match and it looked to me as if it was offside.

606: DEBATE Panucci was in no way attempting to gain an advantage Phil McNulty

"I said to the referee, 'look at the replay'. But he didn't look so that was that."

After the game, Dutch forward Dirk Kuyt admitted he was waiting for the goal to be chalked off for offside.

He told BBC Sport: "I thought it was definitely offside but Ruud told me Panucci was in the goal. Maybe he was behind the line but he is still included in the game so he is not offside. But I definitely thought it was at the time - I was looking at the assistant but he didn't wave his flag so we were really happy."

Hackett's comments were also backed up by the chairman of Austria's refereeing commission Gerhard Kapl, who said the decision was "100% correct".

---

Do you agree with Keith Hackett's ruling? Why not debate the incident or make a suggestion for future editions of You Are The Ref

You Are The Ref on the BBC

[여전히아름다운지]

음..헷갈리긴 했지만 어차피 왈가왈부해도 경기는 끝났으니 뭐..

[착돌붕어㈜]

축구룰 참 헷갈리고 복잡하다는 심판들만 생고생 ㅜㅜ

[나옹이슈퍼킥]

지못미 파누치...........

[모따마르(조굴)]

파누치가 그전에 부상으로 나가서 누워있을때 똑같은상황으로 골먹으면 옵사이드 그냥 몸쌈하고 넘어져서 그냥 라인밖에넘어져있으면 옵사이드아니라는거 인건가?

[착돌붕어㈜]

제 예상으론 같이 넘어진 네덜란드선수는 바로 들어왔는데 파누치는 뒹굴고 있어서 그런듯? 심판이 나가라고 하지않은이상 플레이하고있는걸로 간주햇나본듯

[착돌붕어㈜]

이룰이 공찰라는순간 경기밖으로나가서 오프사이드 맹그는거 악용을 아예 차단할려고그러는걸수도?

[여전히아름다운지]

음..헌데 파누치는 부폰과 충돌해서 넘어졌죠;;

[Don`t forget...neverever..]

만약에 수비수가 골라인 뒤에 있는 경우에는 -오프사이드- 간주가 된다면, 나중에 공격수가 공을 잡았다 싶으면 수비수가 얼른 골라인 바깥으로 자빠지며 나가버리는 경우가 생기므로 이번 -오프사이드- 판정은 옳은 것으로 보입니다.

[NoMore_Victim]

2

[★LUXURY★]

Kuyt 선수도 당연히 오프사이드라고 생각했을 정도니 이탈리아 선수들은 얼마나 억울했을까..

[착돌붕어㈜]

골넣은 반니도 알고있었음 ㅋㅋㅋ

[★LUXURY★]

반니는 위치선정이 천재적인 골스코어!

[Clean]

헐...;; 그럴수도있나..?;

[♨ㅹ㉧r天下♨]

아..ㅋ 나는 당연히 옵사이드라고 생각했는데..역시 규정이라는게 있으니깐..ㅋㅋ 괜히 국제심판이 아니겠죠

[아낙수나문]

당연히 옵사이드 아닐꺼라고 생각하고 있었는데;;;ㅎㅎ 파누치가 부상당해서 밖에서 치료받고 있었던 것도 아니였기에

[미드]

역쉬반니~~~얍삽하고 더티하게(^_^) 넣는거 같지만 타고난 킬러다~~한국에도 그런 선수 하나 나왔으면!

[Michael J.Owen]

인자기의 확장판이죠..... 인자기보다 피지컬도 좋고 활동량도 넓고, 좀 더 다양한 옵션으로 사용 가능하고 말이죠. 둘다 부상에서 자유롭지 못한건 비슷하네요=_=;;