그림자 정부 속의 깊은 정부는 왜 합법적 권력에 저항하나요?

[피터 김]

깊은 정부 속의 깊은 정부들 : 씨에프알, 삼변회, 빌더버그

Deep State Behind the Deep State: CFR, Trilaterals, Bilderberg By Alex Newman with comments by Ron Nov 30, 2017 - 1:27:02 AM

모든 것이 정치에서 보이는 것과 같은 것이 아닙니다. 그리고 최근 몇 개월 동안, 미국인들은 비밀스럽게 워싱턴주의 문자열을 공개 상상력을 사로 잡는 그림자 같은 "깊은 정부 (Deep State)"라는 개념으로 그 어느 때보다 더 가까워졌습니다. 사실상 "깊은 정부"가 존재하는데, 그게 월스트리트의 요소를 포함해 여러가지가 있고, 주류 미국 정부와 깊은 관련이 있는 직업 관료들이 포함되며, 또 더러운 일을 받아들이고 수행하는 것처럼 보이는 "정보부 공동체"를 포함하는 "깊은 정부"가 있을 것입니다. 그것들은 권력에 아무 한계도 없는걸로 보입니다. 그러나 깊은 정부 (Deep State) 뒤에 있는 깊은 정부  (Deep State)나, 또는 실제 깊은 정부 (Deep State)에 대해서는 거의 언급되지 않았습니다. 지금까지는 말입니다.

Everything is not as it seems in politics. And in recent months, the American people have come closer than ever to figuring that out, with the notion of a shadowy "Deep State" secretly pulling the strings in Washington capturing the public imagination. There is indeed a "Deep State," or perhaps several, that includes elements of Wall Street, career bureaucrats with views deeply at odds with those of mainstream America, as well as the "intelligence community" that does the dirty work and appears to accept no limits on its power. But little has been said about the Deep State behind the Deep State - or the real Deep State. Until now.

이 그림자 네트워크의 일부로써 - 외교관계 위원회, 삼변회, 빌더버그 (Bilderberg) 등 - 들은 때로는 기득권 미디어가 그 중요성을 거의 강조하지 않더라도 대중에게 공개됩니다. 다른 강력한 요소는 사실상 보이지 않습니다. 예를 들어, "해골 종단 Skull and Bones"와 같은 비밀 사회, 그리고 보헤미안 그로브 (Bohemian Grove)는 다음 기사에서 설명될 것입니다. 그러나 깊은 정부 뒤의 깊은 정부는 미국과 세계에 엄청난 권력을 부여합니다. 그들의 의제도 분명해지고 있습니다. 그리고 체크되지 않은 채로 남아있다면,이 "깊은 정부" 공작원 네트워크는 인류에 대한 무서운 시스템을 강요하여 종종 "신세계 질서 New World Order"라고 단언합니다. 그러나 미국 국민들은 그들을 멈출수있는 힘이 있지요.

[론 : 저자는 논술을 통해 깊은 정부 배후에 있는 깊은 정부를 위의 세개의 조직이라 말하는데, 그 배후에는 로스차일드와 그 도당이며, 또 눈에 띄지않는 9 위원회 Council of Nine가 있다고 말해진다. 그들은 진짜 악마적 조직이다.] 

Parts of this shadowy network - the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, and more - are sometimes visible to the public, even if the establishment media rarely highlights the significance. Other powerful elements are practically invisible: Secret societies such as "Skull and Bones" and the Bohemian Grove, for example, which will be described in an upcoming article. But combined, it is clear that the Deep State behind the Deep State wields tremendous power over America and the world. The agenda is becoming clear, too. And if left unchecked, this powerful network of "Deep State" operatives fully intends to foist a draconian system on humanity that they often tout as the "New World Order." But the American people have the power to stop it.

[Ron: Arguably behind the Deep State which this author says is behind 'the Deep State' are the Rothschilds and their ilk and behind them is said to be the unseen Council of Nine, a truly demonic group.].

"깊은 정부 (Deep State)"라고 불리는 대부분은 막대한 정부 공무원, 특히 중앙 정보국 (CIA), 국가 안보국 (NSA) 및 기타 비밀 기관의 정부 관료의 일부입니다. 다른 분석가들은 빅 비즈니스 (Big Business) 커뮤니티의 요소에 대해 매우 적절하게 지적했습니다. 미국의 '깊은 정부 (Deep State)'에 대한 아이디어를 개발하기 위한 초창기 목소리의 한 사람인 전 미 국방보안 요원 마이크로프그렌 (Mike Lofgren)은 이를 "국가를 통치하는 공공 및 사립 기관의 하이브리드 주체"라고 언급했다. 그리고 그가 옳다. 그러나 이것은 그가 깨닫는 것보다 더 깊어집니다.

Much of what has been referred to as the "Deep State" is merely part of the government - the legions of entrenched Big Government bureaucrats and especially the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA), and other secretive agencies. Other analysts have pointed - quite properly - to elements of the Big Business community. Former congressional staffer Mike Lofgren, a top-secret security clearance holder and one of the early voices to develop the idea of a "Deep State" in America, refers to it as "a hybrid entity of public and private institutions ruling the country." And he's right. But it goes even deeper than he seems to realize.

물론 로프그렌 (Lofgren)은 정부를 장악한 선출직 공무원이 실제로 책임이 없다는 사실을 처음으로 알아차리지 못했습니다. 깊은 정부의 깊은 친지와 친한 친구조차도 정당 정치와 선거와 관련이 있기 때문에 이 문제에 대해 논평했다. 빌 클린턴 대통령의 멘토였던 조지 캐롤 퀴글리 (Georgetown University) 교수는 수년 동안 딥 스테이트 (Deep State)의 핵심에 가까웠으며, 비밀에 대해서는 반대했지만 그는 대부분의 목표에 동의했다. 그는 심지어 일정 기간 동안 자신의 기록을 검토하도록 허용되었습니다. 그리고 나서 유명한 비밀을 누설했는데, 퀴글리는 폭발적인 발견의 일부를 그의 거대한 1966 년의 <비극과 희망> 저서에 집어 넣었습니다. 교수는 "국제 앵글로필 Anglophile 네트워크"라고 깊은 국가를 언급하면서 그는 "그 또는 대부분의 목표에 아무런 혐오감이 없다"고 말하면서 그는 자신의 많은 것을 위해 "그것과 많은 도구들을 포함시켰다.

Of course, Lofgren was hardly the first to notice that the elected officials who supposedly control the government are not really in charge. Even close friends and associates of the Deep State behind the Deep State have commented on the issue, as it relates to party politics and elections. The late Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, a mentor to President Bill Clinton, was for many years close to the core of the Deep State, and, while he disagreed with the secrecy, he admitted to agreeing with most of its aims. He was even allowed to examine their records for a period of time. And then, spilling the proverbial beans, Quigley put some of his explosive findings in his massive 1966 book Tragedy and Hope. Referring to the Deep State as "international Anglophile network," the professor said he had "no aversion to it or to most of its aims," and added that he had been "close to it and many of its instruments" for much of his life.

정당 정치가 그렇고, 또 선거를 통해 정부 정책을 바꾼다는 기존의 관념에 대해서 퀴글리는 그 아이디어를 조롱했다. Quigley는 자신의 저서에서 "양당체제가 반대의 이상과 정책을 대표해야 한다는 논쟁은 아마도 좌파의 우익과 다른 좌파 중 하나 일뿐이다. 그게 서로 반대일 것이란 기대는 오로지 교리와 과학 사상가에게만 받아들여지는 어리석은 생각"이라고 주장했다. 교수의 폭로에 대해 깊은 국가는 아주 화가 났다. 교수는 단언했는데 "양당의 차별화 대신에 양당은 거의 동일해야했다. 그래서 미국 국민들은 정책에 심대한 변화를 초래하지 않으면서 어떠한 선거에서도 황폐화를 피할 수있다." 라고 말했다.

Quigley는 또한 실제 Deep State의 의제와 음모에 대한 통찰력을 제공했습니다. "금융 자본주의의 힘은 또 다른 광범위한 목적을 가지고 있었으며, 각국의 정치 체제와 세계경제 전체를 지배할 수있는 사적 손안에 세계 통제시스템을 만드는 것만큼 중요했습니다." "이 시스템은 빈번히 개인 모임과 회의에 도착한 비밀 협정에 의해 콘서트에서 행동하는 세계 중앙은행에 의해 봉건주의적 방식으로 통제되어야 했습니다." G20과 같은 회의 중 일부는 잘 알려져 있습니다. 다른 사람들은 더 중요한 것은 아니지만 거의 언급되지 않았으며 대부분의 미국인들에게는 사실상 감춰졌던 것입니다. 

On political parties and using elections to change course in government, Quigley ridiculed the idea. "The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers," Quigley wrote in his book, which reportedly made the Deep State quite upset. "Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy."

Quigley also offered insight into the agenda and machinations of the real Deep State. "The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole," he explained. "This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences." Some of those meetings, such as the G20, are well known. Others, while even more important, are almost never mentioned, and remained virtually unknown to most Americans.

There exists a shadowy network of organizations controlled by the Deep State behind the Deep State that serves to coordinate the operations and tentacles of the machine. While secretive, many of the outfits are not secret societies in the true sense of the term. In fact, they have websites, put out reports, and in many cases make their membership lists public. That these organizations wield incredible power in government, media, academia, military, banking, intelligence, business, and more is beyond dispute.

외교관계 위원회 Council on Foreign Relations

'비극과 희망' 저서에서 퀴글리 교수가 밝힌 내용은 엄청났습니다. "급진적인 권리가 공산주의자가 행동한다고 ​​믿는 방식으로 어느 정도까지 운영되는 국제 Anglophile 네트워크가 존재하고 세대를 거쳐서 존재해왔다."라고 Quigley는 그의 저서에 썼다.

"실제로 라운드 테이블 그룹으로 간주할 수있는 이 네트워크는 공산주의자 또는 다른 단체들과 협력하는데 있어서 혐오감이 없으며 자주 그렇게합니다." 그가 밝힌 주요 원탁 회의에는 미국의 CFR (Foreign Council on Foreign Relations)과 왕립 국제문제 연구소 (RIIA) 또는 채텀 하우스 (Chatham House)로 알려진 영국의 자매 조직이었다. 

What Professor Quigley revealed in Tragedy and Hope was huge. "There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act," Quigley wrote in his book. "In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so." The leading Round Table Groups he identifies include the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the United States and its sister organization in Britain known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA,or the Chatham House).

미국에서 CFR은 깊은 정부 (Deep State) 뒤에 있는 깊은 정부 (Deep State)의 공개적인 얼굴을 대표하는 가장 강력한 조직 중 하나입니다. 차림새가 얼마나 영향력이 있는가에 대한 이해를 돕기 위해 힐러리 클린턴 국무 장관 (Hillary Clinton)의 남편과 딸이 회원 인 워싱턴의 CFR 신임 사무소에서 연설을 했다. "나는 이 새로운 본부에 여기에 있게 된 것을 기쁘게 생각한다", 고 말했다. "나는 뉴욕시의 본부에 종종 가본 적이 있지만 국무부에서 거리의 아래에 있는 이사회의 전초 기지를 갖는 것이 좋다. 우리는 위원회로부터 많은 조언을 얻는다. 우리가 해야 할 일과 미래에 대해 어떻게 생각해야 하는지를 알기 위해 멀리 가지 않아도 될 것이다."

In America, the CFR is among the most powerful organizations representing the public face of the Deep State behind the Deep State. To get some sense of how influential the outfit is, consider the words of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose husband and daughter are members, in a 2009 speech at the CFR's new office in Washington. "I am delighted to be here in these new headquarters," she said. "I have been often to, I guess, the mother ship in New York City, but it's good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won't have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future."

즉, 비선식 CFR 설립은 정책을 수립하고 가시적인 정부가 정책을 시행합니다. [론 : 그러나 CFR은 그 자체로 어떤 정책이 시행되어야하는지에 대해 은밀히 지시됩니다.] 공화당의 기득권 층에도 똑같이 적용됩니다. CFR 요원도 지배합니다. CFR 레이블이 보수당들 사이에서 정치적으로 얼마나 독성을 띠었는지를 아는 CFR "공화당"은 실제로 대중들의 회원 자격을 은폐하는 그들의 부정직함을 자랑합니다. 예를 들어 조지 부시 대통령 시절의 부통령인 딕 체니는 비디오에서 그 회워자격이 자랑인양 말하는게 촬영됐다. "나는 오랫동안 CFR 멤버였고 실제로는 일정 기간 감독이었다. 와이오밍에서는 재선을 위해 선거 운동을 하던 중 결코 말하지 않았다. "라는 식으로 말했다. 그는 거리낌없이 마구 지껄였고, 청중은 웃었다. 그러나 그는 언제도 혼자가 아니었다.  

In other words, the unelected CFR establishment sets policy, and the visible government implements it. [Ron: However, the CFR is itself covertly directed as to what policies are to be implemented.].The same applies to the establishment wing of the Republican Party, which is also dominated by CFR operatives. Knowing how toxic the CFR label has become politically among conservatives, though, leading CFR "Republicans" actually boast of their dishonesty in concealing their membership from the public. George W. Bush's Vice President Dick Cheney, for example, was filmed on video bragging: "I've been a member [of the CFR] for a long time, and was actually a director for some period of time. I never mentioned that when I was campaigning for re-election back home in Wyoming." He cackled, and the audience laughed. But he is hardly alone.

CFR  회원은 사실상 전체 기득권층을 포괄합니다. 공화당과 민주당 지배 기득권의 광대한 범위. 현재 수많은 의회 및 고위 관료 출신. "언론인", 칼럼니스트, 편집자, 앵커, 해설자 및 미디어 임원; 메가 뱅크의 CEO, 의장 및 회장; 모든 행정부의 여러 내각 비서들은 후세대로 돌아간다. 현재 대법원 판사; 전직 대통령과 부통령. 연방 준비 은행 상사; 유명인; 메가 교회 목회자; 군대 고위직; 국제기구의 대사, 외교관 및 관료; 세금면제 재단의 장 및 임원; 전국 주요 대학의 지도자 및 교수; 그리고 "정보 공동체"보스들은 많은 더러운 일을 한다. 거의 보수주의적인 "지도자들", 대부분 네오콘들조차 참여합니다.

기업 회원에는 기득권 언론미디어의 많은 부분과 함께 세계 최대 규모의 대형 메가뱅크, 빅 오일, 빅 파마, 크로니 캐피탈, 군산 복합체, 출판사 등등이 포함된다. 

Members include virtually the entire establishment. Among others: vast swaths of the Republican and Democrat establishment; countless current and former members of Congress and senior bureaucrats; "journalists," columnists, editors, anchors, commentators, and media execs; CEOs, chairmen, and presidents of mega-banks; multiple cabinet secretaries in every administration going back generations; current Supreme Court justices; former presidents and vice-presidents; Federal Reserve bosses; celebrities; mega-church pastors; military brass; ambassadors, diplomats, and bureaucrats at international organizations; tax-exempt foundation chiefs and executives; leaders and professors at key universities across the country; and "intelligence community" bosses who do much of the dirty work. Even some pseudo-conservative "leaders," mostly neocons, are involved.

Corporate members include the world's largest bailed-out mega-banks, Big Oil, Big Pharma, crony capitalists, the military-industrial complex, publishing houses, along with much of the establishment media. Among the mega-banks and financial giants: Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, American Express, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Soros Fund Management, Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Crédit Agricole, Rothschild North America, Inc., and more. Military-industrial complex: DynCorp, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., Raytheon Company, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and more. Big Oil: ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP, Hess, and more. Media: News Corp (Fox News, Wall Street Journal, New York Post, National Geographic, and more), Time Warner (CNN, HBO), The Economist, Bloomberg, and more.

While not everyone involved supports the globalist Deep State agenda, most do, defectors have said. The late Admiral Chester Ward, a CFR member for almost 20 years before defecting and blowing the whistle, explained the danger of the CFR, its agenda, and the ideology of most of its members. "Once the ruling members of CFR have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition," he explained.

"The most articulate theoreticians and ideologists prepare related articles, aided by the research, to sell the new policy and to make it appear inevitable and irresistible. By following the evolution of this propaganda in the most prestigious scholarly journal in the world, [CFR mouthpiece] Foreign Affairs, anyone can determine years in advance what the future defense and foreign policies of the United States will be," he added. "If a certain proposition is repeated often enough in that journal, then the U.S. Administration in power - be it Republican or Democratic - begins to act as if that proposition or assumption were an established fact."

The ultimate goal of the CFR, Ward warned, is global government. "The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government," warned the admiral, who served as the   judge advocate of the U.S. Navy. "This lust to surrender the sovereignty and independence of the United States is pervasive throughout most of the membership." Ward also revealed why the CFR's members would be so violently hostile to Trump's campaign promises. "In the entire CFR lexicon, there is no term of revulsion carrying a meaning so deep as ‘America First,'" he said. Trump, of course, campaigned on an America First platform to stop globalism.

The subversive agenda to betray the American people and subvert their independence, Constitution, and self-government has been made clear even in the CFR's own propaganda organs such as the CFR magazine Foreign Affairs. In April 1974, for example, Richard Gardner, former deputy assistant secretary of state, explained how the agenda for world government would be pursued. "In short, the ‘house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down," he wrote. "An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned assault." Deception and a slow subversion process, then, are the tools of the CFR. The magazine also regularly promotes regional government, illegal war, and other extreme positions.

삼변회  The Trilateral Commission

CFR과 같은 또 하나의 조직은 1973 년에 한 세계 질서의 데이비드 록펠러 (David Rockefeller)를 위해 늦은 세계 주의자와 자칭 공모자가 설립한 삼변회 (Triilateral Commission)이다. 록펠러 (Rockefeller)는 회고록에서 미국의 이익에 반하는 "비밀 계략"으로 "음모를 꾸미는"것을 자랑하면서 "한 세계"질서를 형성했지만, 삼자 위원회의 또 다른 핵심 인물은 록펠러 고문인 즈비그뉴 브레진스키 (Zbigniew Brzezinski) 지미 카터 (Jimmy Carter) 대통령시절 국가 안보보좌관이다. 그의 저서는 록펠러를 크게 감동 시켰습니다. 다른 기괴한 아이디어들 가운데, 1970 년대의 두 살 사이의 책인 후반의 세계 주의자는 미국은 "쓸모 없다"고 주장했다.

그는 구 소련 문제의 일부를 인정하면서도 마르크스 주의에 대한 찬양적 태도를 보여주었다. 

Another outfit like the CFR, only more "elite" and more international, is the Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973 by the late globalist and self-described conspirator for a one world order David Rockefeller. Aside from Rockefeller, who in his memoirs boasted of "conspiring" with a "secret cabal" against the best interests of America to form a "one world" order, the other key figure behind the Trilateral Commission was Zbigniew Brzezinski, advisor to Rockefeller and the National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter. His writings greatly impressed Rockefeller. Among other bizarre ideas, the late globalist, in his 1970 book Between Two Ages, argued that America was "obsolete."

While he acknowledged some of the problems in the Soviet Union, Brzezinski also showered praise on Marxism.

"Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man's universal vision," he wrote. "Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief: it stresses man's capacity to shape his material destiny - finite and defined as man's only reality - and it postulates the absolute capacity of man to truly understand his reality as a point of departure for his active endeavors to shape it. To a greater extent than any previous mode of political thinking, Marxism puts a premium on the systematic and rigorous examination of material reality and on guides to action derived from that examination."

Following his attack on obsolete America and his praise for Marxism, Brzezinski, a member of the CFR before his death, goes on to advocate the creation of "a council for global cooperation" bringing together "the United States, Japan, and Western Europe." This body, he wrote, would "be concerned with political strategy" and "bringing together the political leaders of states sharing certain common aspirations and problems of modernity." But in the end of the book, as pointed out by The New American's C. Mitchell Shaw in Brzezinski's obituary, Brzezinski reveals the real purpose of his proposed council: Another step on the road to world government.

"To sum up: Though the objective of shaping a community of the developed nations is less ambitious than the goal of world government, it is more attainable," he wrote. "It is more ambitious than the concept of an Atlantic community but historically more relevant to the new spatial revolution. Though cognizant of present divisions between communist and non-communist nations, it attempts to create a new framework for international affairs not by exploiting these divisions but rather by striving to preserve and create openings for eventual reconciliation. Finally, it recognizes that the world's developed nations have a certain affinity, and that only by nurturing a greater sense of communality among them can an effective response to the increasing threat of global fragmentation - which itself intensifies the growing world-wide impatience with human inequality - be mounted."

Much less has been written about the Trilateral Commission than, say, the CFR, but its influence is nevertheless enormous. And even well-respected conservatives have long recognized the threat this outfit poses to liberty and America. In his 1979 memoir With No Apologies, Senator Barry Goldwater exposed its agenda. "In my view the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power - political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical," he wrote. "What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved.... As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future."

그 즈음에 스탠포드 역사가인 안토니 서튼 (Antony Sutton)과 패트릭 우드 (Patrick Wood) 연구원이 '삼자 간위원회 (Trilateral Commission)'를 폭로했다. 최근의 성명서에서 우드는 그 중요성을 강조했다. "삼자위원회는 국제적이며 '새로운 국제 경제 질서'를 창설하기 위해 설립되었다. "회원국들은 유엔을 통해 지속 가능한 개발 및 녹색 경제로 유입되는 것을 포함하여 모든 현대화 세계의 건축가이자 운전자였습니다. 삼자 간위원회는 범위면에서 국제적이지만 미국에서 그들은 단지 소위 '깊은 정부 (Deep State)'라고 불리는 그들은 사실상 깊은 정부이다!" 

Around that time, a major expose of the Trilateral Commission was written by Stanford historian Antony Sutton and researcher Patrick Wood entitled  Trilaterals Over Washington. In a recent statement, Wood highlighted the significance. "The Trilateral Commission was international, founded to create a 'New International Economic Order,'" Wood explained. "Their members have been the architects and drivers of all modern globalization, including that which comes through the United Nations as Sustainable Development and Green Economy. Although the Trilateral Commission is international in scope, in the U.S. they are more than just being part of the so-called Deep State, they ARE the Deep State!"

빌더버그 회의  The Bilderberg Meetings

CFR과 Trilateral Commission 외에도 Rockefeller와 다른 지배 글로벌리스트의 핵심인 Bilderberg 조직은 또 다른 그림자 조직입니다. 최근 몇 년 전까지만해도, 연례 회의를 주최하는 네트워크는 세계에서 가장 영향력있는 많은 사람들과 유용한 바보들이 정기적으로 참석했음에도 불구하고 미국 대중에게 사실상 알려지지 않았습니다. 참석자 가운데 큰 정부, 빅 그린, 빅 미디어, 빅 오일, 빅 스파이조직 수장, 빅뱅크, 빅 전쟁, 빅 인터넷, 빅 재단, 빅 공산주의, 빅 데이터 및 기타 등등의 중요한 " 빅스 "들이 참석했다. 사실상 모든 참석자들은 적어도 하나의 공통된 요소를 공유하고 있습니다 : 그것은 글로벌리즘과 비밀주의이다.

In addition to the CFR and the Trilateral Commission is yet another shadowy outfit with Rockefeller and other establishment globalists at its core: Bilderberg. Until recent years, the network, which hosts annual meetings, was virtually unknown to the American public, despite the regular attendance of many of the world's most influential people and their useful idiots. Among the attendees is a collection of powerful figures from Big Government, Big Green, Big Media, Big Oil, Big Espionage, Big Banks, Big War, Big Internet, Big Foundations, Big Communism, Big Data, and most of the other important "Bigs." Virtually all of the attendees share at least one common element though: a devotion to globalism and secrecy.

In public, at least Bilderberg summit organizers work to downplay the confab as a mere off-the-record discussion forum. A press release from Bilderberg released ahead of this year's summit in Chantilly, Va., for example, claims the purpose is merely "to foster dialogue between Europe and North America." "There is no desired outcome, no minutes are taken and no report is written. Furthermore, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued," the statement claims. Numerous attendees, though, have suggested and even openly admitted in public statements over the years that much more than a mere "private talk" is in fact going on at the controversial summit.

In fact, attendees have admitted that policy is set behind closed doors. For example, in 2010, former NATO boss and two-time Bilderberg attendee Willy Claes said in a radio interview that reports of speeches given at the summit are compiled. "The participants are then obviously considered to use this report in setting their policies in the environments in which they affect," Claes added, which analysts said was essentially an admission that Bilderberg attendees are secretly plotting your future behind closed doors.

The year before Claes' admission, then-Bilderberg chairman Etienne Davignon - a former European Union commissar and current Belgian minister of state - told the online EUobserver that the summits "helped create" the controversial euro currency imposed on 17 formerly sovereign European nations. Much evidence also suggests that the summits played a major role in foisting the EU super-state on the peoples of Europe against their will - a process that continues despite the lack of public support. Speaking to the BBC in 2005, Davignon also admitted that at the summit, "automatically around the table you have internationalists."

More recently, despite protestations to the contrary, a Bilderberg attendee and the leader of the Socialist International-aligned Dutch Labor Party admitted on camera this year that he was at the summit in his official capacity as parliamentary leader. Asked if he was there in an informal capacity, he responded: "Well, I'm formal, because being a politician, you're 24/7, so there's no way of exiting my role." The Bilderberg website says, "Participants take part in the conference as individuals in their own right," but the comments by the Dutch lawmaker and "sustainability" zealot Diederik Samsom suggest otherwise.

More than 15 years ago, meanwhile, far-left Bilderberg attendee Will Hutton - a former British newspaper editor, rabid pro-EU extremist, and vehement opponent of American conservatism - also hinted at the influence of the gathering. "[Bilderberg] is one of the key meetings of the year," he wrote in 1998. "The consensus established is the backdrop against which policy is made worldwide." The admission could not get much clearer than that.

Aside from guiding policy, a great deal of anecdotal evidence suggests Bilderberg plays a major role in selecting the policymakers who will foist the schemes on an unsuspecting public. In 1991, for example, a virtually unknown governor from Arkansas attended. Shortly after that, he became President Clinton. Obama, too, went to Bilderberg before becoming president. It is not just American politicians whose careers seem to get a major boost from attending the summits, either. Tony Blair, for example, attended Bilderberg as an opposition member of Parliament.

He then became prime minister shortly afterwards. Numerous other British prime ministers have also attended. Other countries in Europe have faced similar occurrences, such as Bilderberg bigwig and Goldman Sachs operative Mario Monti being installed as the unelected prime minister of Italy in 2011.

At the European level - where voters and the peoples of Europe have virtually no say - the same phenomenon has been observed. In 2005, the state-funded BBC noted, "All the recent presidents of the European Commission attended Bilderberg meetings before they were appointed." EU overlords, of course, are not elected. In 2009, meanwhile, former Belgian Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy - a virtual nobody unknown throughout the bloc - was mysteriously installed as EU "president" days after attending the confab. He promptly announced that "global governance" was advancing.

Indeed, what unites the seemingly disparate globalists appears to be mainly their fanatical devotion to globalism - the transfer of political power away from nations and people to unaccountable supranational regimes. Based on their public statements, it appears that virtually every attendee at Bilderberg is and has been a proponent of global and regional governance rather than national independence. In 2001, former British chancellor of the exchequer and Bilderberg bigwig Denis Healey even told the U.K. Guardianthat it was a little "exaggerated, but not wholly unfair" to say that the outfit's overall goal was to impose a global government on humanity. "Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn't go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless," he claimed. "So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing." By "community," globalists really mean government - after all, the European Union was a "community" before the full-blown super-state was openly announced.

Beyond the Bilderberg, CFR, the Trilaterals, and such establishment organs are secret societies including Skull and Bones, Bohemian Grove, and others. There are also key leaders of the Deep State behind the Deep State: Families such as the Rockefeller, Soros, and Rothschild, among them. Aside from their organizations and meetings, along with government, they operate through tax-exempt foundations. All of those topics will be explored in upcoming articles in The New American as part of this series on the Deep State. And beyond all those that are known are, undoubtedly, others that are not even known publicly. And for Christians and God-fearing people, there is certainly a spiritual component to it all. But Americans do not need to be helpless victims of these shadowy forces.

Unfortunately, Trump has many operatives for the real Deep State serving at the highest levels of his administration. More than a few of his cabinet secretaries, for example, are members of the CFR and/or attendees of Bilderberg. But, it is also becoming obvious that the Deep State behind the Deep State does not trust Trump - at best - and actively despises him at worst. That is a good sign, though it is no guarantee that anything will change.

Not just exposure but organization and concerted action are needed to effect positive change, according to Art Thompson, the chief executive officer of The John Birch Society, which has maintained since its founding that there is design behind America's long slide from constitutional government. "The John Birch Society has been the most consistent organization exposing the so-called Deep State for over 50 years and doing so in a responsible manner,"

Thompson told The New American, which is an affiliate of the JBS. "There have been times when the exposure has hurt them greatly and usually exposure is all that needs to be done. But there may come a time when exposure will not be enough or perhaps impossible if enough people do not get involved to do something responsible about it now. The solution is to do what Jefferson said - bind the politicians down with the chains of the Constitution - force them to adhere to the Constitution. That is our job at hand and individual action is not enough. Organizational, concerted action is what is needed."

Americans who wish to see a return to self-government under the Constitution must get involved. There is an incredible opportunity, now, to set the Deep State's globalist agenda back by decades or even generations. The American people, acting through Congress, will be the key. But to seize the opportunity, Americans must get educated, activated, and organized.

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, education, politics, and more. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU or on Facebook.

Related articles:

Deep State "Intelligence" Threatens Trump, Self-Government

"Deep State" Bureaucracy vs. Trump, America, Constitution

Deep State and Fake News

Globalist Zbigniew Brzezinski Dead at 89

Bilderberg: Where Big Business and Big Government Plot Globalism

The EU: Regionalization Trumps Sovereignty

Council On Foreign Relations Exposed

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/27251-deep-state-behind-the-deep-state-cfr-trilaterals-bilderberg

그림자정부는 어떻게 미국을 통제하려드나요? | 경제 이야기 2017.07.20 07:00:24 나빴는데, 트럼프 팀에게는 말할 것이 없었다. 이제 우리는 폭스 뉴스가 자신의 등급 챔피언인 터커 칼슨 앵커를 랄프 피터스 장군 (Lt Col. Ralph Peters)와 CFR 맥스 부트 Goon Squad Max Boot (CFR Goon Squad Max Boot) 책임자가 도덕적인 파산에 대해 눈을 뜨면서 견딜 수없는 수준에 이르렀다. When I look back...

그림자정부는 누가 확실히 묘사하나요? | 경제 이야기 2017.09.21 06:11:47 벤게리슨은 그림자정부의 늪을 정확하게 보여준다 Ben Garrison's Guide To The Deep State Swamp By Ben Garrison Sep 18, 2017 - 10:09:28 PM 트럼프의 대선승리는 확실히 한가지를 증거하는데 : 그림자 정부가 진짜라는 사실 Trump's election confirmed one thing for certain: The Deep State is real. 그림자정부...

누가 그림자 정부의 존재를 숨기려하나요? | 경제 이야기 2017.08.30 07:19:36 미국엔 그림자 정부같은 것은 없다... 이것은 그렇게 보일 뿐이라고라" “There is No American Deep State…it just Looks Like There is” By Kit Aug 28, 2017 - 4:06:30 AM https://off-guardian.org/2017/03/21/there-is-no-american-deep-state-it-just-looks-like-there-is/ 미국에 그림자 정부가 없다고 믿게...

미국인들은 왜 그림자정부에 대항해 싸우나요? | 경제 이야기 2017.10.04 07:43:45 그림자정부 세계주의자는 미국체제를 파괴하길 원한다 - 캐서린 핏츠 Deep State Globalists Want to Destroy US Constitution – Catherine Austin Fittsyesterday zen1248 in news https://steemit.com/news/@zen12/deep-state-globalists-want-to-destroy-us-constitution-catherine-austin-fitts 이것은 그들이...