<P> </P>
<P>강원대 </P>
<P>4월 23일 (월, 8:00 AM) 내과와 함께 한 MS conference,,,에서 토론의 주제가 된 논문입니다.</P>
<P>제목은,,,</P>
<P>Comparative outcomes for patients who do and do not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease in New York </P>
<P>결론적으로 CABG 보다는 PCI 가 훨씬 좋다는 내과의 주장,,,음,,,저는,,,잘 모르겠습니다.</P>
<P> </P>
<P><a href='javascript:fileFilterViewer("http://cfile272.uf.daum.net/attach/18365E3F4F94A1A825E67C", "/cfile272/18/365E3F4F94A1A825E67C", "PCI vs medication in stable CAD_Circulation 2012-Apr.pdf", "grpid%3D1KNZ0%26fldid%3D8ZaA%26dataid%3D81%26fileid%3D1%26regdt%3D20120423092657&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcfile272.uf.daum.net%2Fattach%2F18365E3F4F94A1A825E67C")'><img src="https://t1.daumcdn.net/daumtop_deco/icon/icon.hanmail.net/editor/p_pdf_s.gif?rv=1.0.1" border="0" alt="첨부파일" class="vam"/> PCI vs medication in stable CAD_Circulation 2012-Apr.pdf</a></P>
<P></P>
<!-- -->
