Do "Going to Swimming", "Hiking" and "Camping" Make a Collection?

Data SIX : Potential concept = after school activity     KT: Then what are they doing? Look at the TV. S: Going to swimming? S: Hiking. S: Camping.   아이들 답변들은 <collection complex- 수집체 복합체>에 가깝다고 생각한다.   A collection complex is a set of OBJECTS that are functionally related to a particular activity (e.g. a swimsuit, goggles, a swimming cap, a towel).    But here we have a set of ACTIVITIES that are related to a particular object--the picture on the TV.   It's true that the WORDS are STRUCTURALLY related to a particular phrase ("Let's go swimming/hiking/camping" or "The yare swimming/hiking/camping""). Do you think the children are only thinking the words as objects? They don't think of the words as meanings?   Notice that one child says " going to swimming". Consider:   a) We're going swimming. b) We're going to go swimming. c) We will go swimming.   Which do you think is LEAST  CONFUSING for the children? Which does Ms. Hong use?   혼합적 이미지나 연합적 복합체와는 달리 수집체 복합체는 정서적인 연합에 토대를 두지 않고 옷을 입거나, 음식을 먹거나, 잠자러 가는 등 무언가를 하는 도중에 기능적으로 생겨나는 연합과 관계에 토대를 둔다. 이는 TV 화면을 통해 방과 후 활동을 하는 아이들의 모습을 보고 대표적 대상으로부터 형성되는 생각들이지만 대상들이 서로 다 다르다.   Yes, the collection is different from the syncretic heap; it doesn't have a SUBJECTIVE base (this doesn't necessarily mean an "emotional" basis--it usually means the child's ACTIVITY). It has a base in the child's experience.   For example, a knife, a spoon, and a fork are all part of eating a meal. And "Carribean Bay" and "Ocean Park" are all part of "going to an amusement park on the weekend. But:   A) These are all physical objects. Are "hiking", "camping", and "swimming" really physical objects?   B) These are all part of a routine activity. Are "hiking", "camping", and "swimming" really part of after school activities?