A Response to JTBC’s Fact Check, Part I: 2020 Election Fraud in South Korea

[나가자]

A Response to JTBC’s Fact Check, Part I: 2020 Election Fraud in South Korea
2020-5-17, Tara O

JTBC has mentioned the World Tribune, Dr. Gong Byung-ho, and me in its efforts to discredit those who are raising the issue of election fraud in South Korea.  JTBC brought up three important issues in its reporting:

• Election fraud in South Korea
• Truth about the impeachment of South Korea’s president Park Geun-hye
• “South Korean President Moon is a spy”

I am glad that JTBC brought up these topics, because the mainstream media in South Korea as well as major political parties have been relatively silent, especially given the seriousness of these issues.  I believe a proper response should address these points.

Embedded in the discussions of the above topics are:  Free and fair elections, the rule of law in South Korea, & subversion.  Today’s focus is on the first topic, 2020 Election Fraud in South Korea.

Unmarked ballot. 1st box not checked, yet it is in the slot for candidate 1, Lee Yong-seon (이용선) and is counted as a vote for Candidate Lee.

Election Fraud in South Korea

JTBC stated that South Korean domestic media had already concluded there was no fraud at all, describing the election fraud issue as a conspiracy theory.  How can the domestic news “already conclude” there was no fraud in South Korea’s April election?  It is not an investigative organization and not a judiciary body.

Further, South Korea’s main media hardly covered the topic, although a few more major news outlets are beginning to cover the election fraud issue after JTBC aired this topic.  Of course the media’s near silence is understandable, when the police arrest

University of Michigan Professor Walter Mebane, an expert in detecting election fraud, used his statistical model to show that fraud occurred in South Korea’s 2020 elections.  His model showed more than a million fraudulent votes.  His report is here

• More votes cast than the number of registered voters in the Republic of Korea
• Unmarked ballots were run through a vote counting machine and counted toward the ruling party candidate, instead of being discarded
• The National Election Commission stipulated that Vote counting machines shouldn’t have the ability to communicate, yet the vote counting machine has 4 open USB ports, and at least one machine had a USB mouse plugged into it. USB ports are serious security vulnerabilities and hacking devices have been made to look like any number of innocuous items such as thumb drives, phone cables, keyboards, or computer mice.
• Ballots for Seocho-eul precinct were found in Bundang-eul precinct
• There were issues with vote counting in Buyeo City:
  • Buyeo City, Initial vote count:
    • Deobureo Minjoo Party: 180
    • United Future Party: 80
    • Total: 260
  • Buyeo City, After rebooting:
    • Deobureo Minjoo Party: 159
    • United Future Party 170
    • Total: 329
• National Election Commission’s (NEC) “sealing” tape, easily peals off of boxes like a Post-it note, rather than damaging the box like a proper security tape
• Pre-vote ballots were stored in duffle bags inside a gym next to exercise machines instead of in a properly secured and monitored storage area
• CC cameras were not installed in pre-vote ballot storage areas, despite voters’ requests
• After a judge ordered the preservation and transfer of ballots, the sealing tape on the boxes containing the ballots showed signs of tampering. The seal, stamped on the sealing tape, needs to straddle over both the tape and the box, so if the tape is removed, it leaves a partial seal mark on the box. Some boxes had partial seals left on the box. Some tried to re-stamp the seal over the same spot. Some used entirely different boxes–Samlip brand snack boxes.
• Some ballot boxes had holes in the sides.
• Early vote/mail-in vote ballots were transported in open plastic baskets, rather than locked, sealed containers
• The election commission at Yeonsu precinct in Incheon defied the court order and did not hand over early voting ballots for preservation (for future investigations and recounting).
• One voter is given one short ballot and one long ballot, but some ballots of the same types were not completely separated, yet voted.
• These short ballots (for directly voting for candidates, vs. long ballots with 35 parties for choosing proportional representatives) have uneven margins. They lack anti-counterfeiting measures.

Partial seals on the paper portion of the boxes indicated the sealing tape has been removed. 1) Top left: Tried to stamp the seal over the same spot. 2) Top right: reused the same tape that was removed–the seals do not make a whole circle. 3) Lower left: Restamped with seals, but theh old partial seals still there. 4) Lower right: Used a different box altogether (Samlip snack box).

Hole in the box

Ballots in baskets for transport

Ballots in duffle bags at a gym

Ballots in duffle bags marked “election administration” in a gym

Ballots in duffel bags carried out of the gym

The National Election Commission security tape peals off like a Post-it note.

Video: Mouse is connected to the back of the vote counting machine, which has 4 USB ports

The wire connects a mouse and the vote counting machine, enables hacking

Vote Counting machine has 4 USB ports, allowing connectivity with thumb drives, phone cables, keyboards, or computer mice

One voter is given one ballot. The ballots are not completely separated, yet voted.

These short ballots (for directly voting for candidates, vs long ballots with 35 parties for choosing proportional representatives) have uneven margins. They lack anti-counterfeiting measures.

The list goes on.  What is important in a liberal democracy is that the elections be conducted in a manner that is both free and fair. The integrity of the electoral process and subsequent public faith in the process are vital for the legitimacy of government.  These irregularities in the 2020 election have caused many citizens to not trust the process.  When South Koreans raise concerns regarding widespread election fraud based on the evidence before them, they are carrying out their rights and responsibilities as citizens of the Republic of South Korea.

It is not too late for the media to do their part in restoring confidence, by looking into these matters closely, and informing the public with facts.  JTBC and the other major media entities can play a significant role in this crucial aspect of the liberal democratic process, and help the citizens hold their elected officials and the National Election Commission accountable, and thus restore trust in the electoral system.

https://eastasiaresearch.org/2020/05/16/a-response-to-jtbcs-fact-check-part-i-2020-election-fraud-in-south-korea/