Re;Re;최대한 애절하고,간절하고,불쌍한 마음으로,두손모아.

[나라의 기둥]

이제 딱 2장 남았는데...혹시 봐 주실순 없는지요??

원래 숙제는 자신이 해야해!!라는 지론을 가진 저이지만.

그렇다고 제가 안해본거 절대 아닙니다.

위에서 보셨다시피!!!

몇 시간해서 나온게 저 모냥이라...

참고로 이 원서의 제목은 "전쟁과 사회정책"입니다.

To apply this Aristotelian precept to the modern world means, in effect, that a social system must be so organized as to enable all citizens [p.77] (and not only soldiers) to learn what to make of their lives in peacetime. In this context the 1944 Education Act becomes intelligible; so does the 1942 Beveridge Report, the 1945 Family Allowances, the 1946 National Health Service and the 1951 National Insurance Acts. All these measures of social policy were in part an expression‎ of the needs of wartime strategy to fuse and unify the conditions of life of civilians and non-civilians alike. In practice, this involved the whole community in accepting an enlargement of obligations - an extension of social discipline – attend to the primary needs of all citizens.

In no sphere of need is the imprint of war on social policy more vividly illustrated than in respect to dependant needs: the needs of wives, children and other relatives for income-maintenance allowances when husbands and fathers are serving in the forces. To trace in detail the system of service pay and allowances from the Napoleonic Wars to the Second World War is to see how, as war has follows war in an ascending order of intensity, so the dependant needs of wives and children have been increasingly recognized. The more that the waging of war has come to require a total effort by the nation, the more have the dependant needs of the family been recognized and accepted as a social responsibility.

This trend on the wartime recognition of family dependencies has also profoundly affected social security policies in general. New systems of service pay and allowances threw into sharper prominence the fact that in industrial society money rewards take no account of family responsibilities; nor, until 1939, did many of the payments made under various social services. Thus, one immediate effect was that dependants’ allowances were added to workmen’s compensation and other schemes. Another was that in many respects war pensions and industrial injury pensions had to be brought into line. This was done because it seemed inappropriate to make distinctions between war and peace, civilians and non-civilians.

*  *  *  *  *

Looking back over the various points I have made about the relationship between the war effort of a community and its social policies in peace as well as in war, one general conclusion may be ventured. The waging of modern war presupposes and imposes a great increase on social discipline; moreover, this discipline is only tolerable if, and only if, social inequalities are not intolerable. The need for less inequality is expressed, for example, in the changes that take place in what in socially approved behavior; marked differences in standards of living, in dress, in luxury entertainment and in indulgencies of many kinds are disapproved.

***이 부분두로 해석을 해보았는데..

내가 보고 있는 다양한 관점은 공동사회와 전쟁에서 일반 종결이 위험을 당하게 될지도 모르는 것에 따라 그 사회적 정책도 전쟁과 관련있는 대책을 마련하는 것이다. 전쟁을 수행하는 것은 더욱이 전제로 하고, 사회적 규율 위에서 큰 상승을 부과한다. 이 규율은 단지 그대로다. 그리고 사회적 부등식은 견딜 수 없지 않다. 예를 들면 사치 엔터테인먼트의 그리고 다수 종류의 방종의 드레스에서 생활 수준의 사회적으로 승인된 행동 현저한 차이의 무엇이 인가하지 않게 되는지 발생하는 변경에서 더 적은 부등식에 대한 요구는 표명된다..로 나왔습니다.아;;;번역기를 돌려 봤는데 이상해서 제가 나름대로 손을 보았는데..아직 손을 덜 봤는지...

영...제가 손보고도 이게 무슨말인지 궁금할 정도니까요..^ㅜ.ㅜ;;