All three stories are open to multiple interpretations, which is one of the best characteristics of good writing, and we had a wide range of ideas for most of the questions. I also discovered that many of our members seem to enjoy Carver’s rather dry and simple writing style (at this point, I felt a bit sorry for having chosen Henry James the other time!).
Sylvi said the baker’s bread symbolizes that life must go on despite hardship (Q4). Daisy said she couldn’t fully understand the ending of A Small, Good Thing, but the missed communication eventually helped the couple by bringing them together with the baker. Most of us agreed that small acts of kindness can help people get through difficult moments (Q6). Jodi’s comment about the “bread-buying (or pain in French) people” was interesting. There is always a long line of people waiting to buy a loaf of bread at 'Whitelier', the bakery near my home (Is this shop popular in other towns?).
Jamie’s interpretation that the couple first tried to find someone to pour their anger and frustration onto—the baker—was insightful. It could happen to any of us at a time like that: trying to find a scapegoat when something has gone completely wrong. We also talked about Eileen, the character in Fever. I tend to agree with Livi’s view (against Sylvi's definition...) that she genuinely tries to help Carlyle (although she left him) by encouraging him to write about what he is going through (the fever as a symbol of 'growth pain'). We often come across people like her who are mainly faithful to their feelings and live their lives according to their own inclinations. Many such people have also found their calling in art (Paul Gauguin somehow comes to mind first).
Elina’s way of leading the discussion was impressive. We managed to cover most of the discussion questions without much overlap in sharing our thoughts, while also maintaining a healthy tension—you never quite knew who would be the next to speak!