|
○Silent Spring By Rachel Carson
1)Silent Spring is an environmental science book by Rachel Carson.[1] Published on September 27, 1962, the book documented the environmental harm caused by the indiscriminate use of pesticides. Carson accused the chemical industry of spreading disinformation, and public officials of accepting the industry's marketing claims unquestioningly.
2)In the late 1950s, Carson began to work on environmental conservation, especially environmental problems that she believed were caused by synthetic pesticides. The result of her research was Silent Spring, which brought environmental concerns to the American public. The book was met with fierce opposition by chemical companies, but it swayed public opinion and led to a reversal in U.S. pesticide policy, a nationwide ban on DDT for agricultural uses,[2] and an environmental movement that led to the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.[3][4]
3)In 2006, Silent Spring was named one of the 25 greatest science books of all time by the editors of Discover magazine.[5]
******
(A)==Research and writing==
1)[[image:Rachel-Carson.jpg|right|upright=0.9|thumb|Rachel Carson, 1940 <br />[[United States Fish and Wildlife Service|Fish and Wildlife Service]] employee photo]]
2)In the mid-1940s, Carson became concerned about the use of synthetic pesticides, many of which had been developed through the [[military funding of science]] after [[World War II]]. The United States Department of Agriculture's 1957 [[fire ant]] eradication program, which involved aerial spraying of [[DDT]] and other pesticides mixed with [[fuel oil]] and included the spraying of private land, prompted Carson to devote her research, and her next book, to pesticides and environmental poisons.{{harvnb|Lear|1997|loc=Ch. 14}}{{harvnb|Murphy|2005|loc=Ch. 1}} Landowners in Long Island filed a suit to have the spraying stopped, and many in affected regions followed the case closely. Though the suit was lost, the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] granted petitioners the right to gain injunctions against potential environmental damage in the future, laying the basis for later environmental actions.{{cite web|url=http://ellsworthmaine.com/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12535&Itemid=47 |title=Obituary of Marjorie Spock |publisher=Ellsworthmaine.com |date=January 30, 2008 |access-date=March 16, 2009 }}{{dead link|date=June 2016|bot=medic}}{{cite journal|last1=Greene|first1=Jennifer|title=Obituary for Marjorie Spock|journal=Newsletter of the Portland Branch of Anthroposophical Society in Portland, Oregon|date=February 2008|volume=4|issue=2|page=7|url=http://www.portlandanthroposophy.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/February2008PortlandBranchNewsletter.pdf|access-date=29 August 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150829182612/http://www.portlandanthroposophy.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/February2008PortlandBranchNewsletter.pdf|archive-date=29 August 2015}}
3)The impetus for ''Silent Spring'' was a letter written in January 1958 by Carson's friend, Olga Owens Huckins, to ''[[The Boston Herald]]'', describing the death of birds around her property in Duxbury, Massachusetts, resulting from the aerial spraying of DDT to kill mosquitoes, a copy of which Huckins sent to Carson.{{Cite book |last=Matthiessen |first=Peter |title=Courage for the Earth: Writers, Scientists, and Activists Celebrate the Life and Writing of Rachel Carson |page=[https://archive.org/details/courageforearthw00matt/page/135 135] |publisher=Mariner Books |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-618-87276-3 |url=https://archive.org/details/courageforearthw00matt/page/135 }}{{Cite news |last=Himaras |first=Eleni |date=May 26, 2007 |title=Rachel's Legacy – Rachel Carson's groundbreaking 'Silent Spring' |work=The Patriot Ledger |location=Quincy, Massachusetts}} Carson later wrote that this letter prompted her to study the environmental problems caused by chemical pesticides.{{Cite book |last=Wishart |first=Adam |url=https://archive.org/details/oneinthreesonsjo00wish/page/82 |title=One in Three: A Son's Journey Into the History and Science of Cancer |publisher=Grove Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-8021-1840-0 |location=New York, New York |page=[https://archive.org/details/oneinthreesonsjo00wish/page/82 82] |language=en-us}}{{Cite news |last=Hynes |first=H. Patricia |title =Perspective on the Environment – Unfinished Business: 'Silent Spring' On the 30th anniversary of Rachel Carson's indictment of DDT, pesticides still threaten human life |page=7 (Metro Section) |work=Los Angeles Times |date=September 10, 1992 }}</ref>
3)The [[Audubon Naturalist Society]] actively opposed chemical spraying programs and recruited Carson to help publicize the U.S. government's spraying practices and related research.<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=312–317}}</ref> Carson began the four-year project of ''Silent Spring'' by gathering examples of environmental damage attributed to DDT. She tried to enlist essayist [[E. B. White]] and a number of journalists and scientists to her cause. By 1958, Carson had arranged a book deal, with plans to co-write with ''[[Newsweek]]'' science journalist Edwin Diamond. However, when ''The New Yorker'' commissioned a long and well-paid article on the topic from Carson, she began considering writing more than the introduction and conclusion as planned; soon it became a solo project. Diamond would later write one of the harshest critiques of ''Silent Spring''.<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=317–327}}</ref>
4)As her research progressed, Carson found a sizable community of scientists who were documenting the physiological and environmental effects of pesticides.<ref name=CarsonPaull/> She took advantage of her personal connections with many government scientists, who supplied her with confidential information on the subject. From reading the scientific literature and interviewing scientists, Carson found two scientific camps: those who dismissed the possible danger of pesticide spraying barring conclusive proof, and those who were open to the possibility of harm and willing to consider alternative methods, such as [[biological pest control]].<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=327–336}}</ref>
5)[[File:16-p-1402-2 Fire Ants on Trial.webm|thumb|thumbtime=00:48|right|upright=1.15|''Fire Ants on Trial'' – public service film produced by the [[USDA]]]]
By 1959, the [[USDA]]'s [[Agricultural Research Service]] responded to the criticism by Carson and others with a public service film, ''Fire Ants on Trial''; Carson called it "flagrant propaganda" that ignored the dangers that spraying pesticides posed to humans and wildlife. That spring, Carson wrote a letter, published in ''[[The Washington Post]]'', that attributed the recent decline in bird populations{{mdash}}in her words, the "silencing of birds"{{mdash}}to pesticide overuse.<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=342–346}}</ref> The same year, the 1957, 1958, and 1959 crops of U.S. [[cranberry|cranberries]] were found to contain high levels of the herbicide [[aminotriazole]] and the sale of all cranberry products was halted. Carson attended the ensuing FDA hearings on revising pesticide regulations; she was discouraged by the aggressive tactics of the chemical industry representatives, which included expert testimony that was firmly contradicted by the bulk of the scientific literature she had been studying. She also wondered about the possible "financial inducements behind certain pesticide programs".<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=358–361}}</ref>
6)Research at the [[United States National Library of Medicine|National Library of Medicine]] of the [[National Institutes of Health]] brought Carson into contact with medical researchers investigating the gamut of cancer-causing chemicals. Of particular significance was the work of [[National Cancer Institute]] researcher and founding director of the environmental cancer section [[Wilhelm Hueper]], who classified many pesticides as [[carcinogens]]. Carson and her research assistant Jeanne Davis, with the help of NIH librarian Dorothy Algire, found evidence to support the pesticide-cancer connection; to Carson the evidence for the toxicity of a wide array of synthetic pesticides was clear-cut, though such conclusions were very controversial beyond the small community of scientists studying pesticide [[carcinogenesis]].<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=355–358}}</ref>
7)By 1960, Carson had sufficient research material and the writing was progressing rapidly. She had investigated hundreds of individual incidents of pesticide exposure and the resulting human sickness and ecological damage. In January 1960, she suffered an illness which kept her bedridden for weeks, delaying the book. As she was nearing full recovery in March, she discovered cysts in her left breast, requiring a [[mastectomy]]. By December that year, Carson discovered that she had breast cancer, which had [[metastasized]].<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=360–368}}</ref> Her research was also delayed by revision work for a new edition of ''[[The Sea Around Us]]'', and by a collaborative photo essay with [[Erich Hartmann (photographer)|Erich Hartmann]].<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=372–373}}</ref> Most of the research and writing was done by the fall of 1960, except for a discussion of recent research on [[biological controls]] and investigations of some new pesticides. However, further health troubles delayed the final revisions in 1961 and early 1962.<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=376–377}}</ref>
8)The work's title was inspired by a poem by [[John Keats]], "[[La Belle Dame sans Merci]]", which contained the lines "The sedge is wither'd from the lake, And no birds sing."<ref>{{cite journal |author=Coates, Peter A. |title=The Strange Stillness of the Past: Toward an Environmental History of Sound and Noise |journal=Environmental History |volume=10 |issue=4 |pages=636–665 |date=October 2005 |doi=10.1093/envhis/10.4.636 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> "Silent Spring" was initially suggested as a title for the chapter on birds. By August 1961, Carson agreed to the suggestion of her literary agent Marie Rodell: ''Silent Spring'' would be a metaphorical title for the entire book{{mdash}}suggesting a bleak future for the whole natural world{{mdash}}rather than a literal chapter title about the absence of birdsong.<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=375, 377–378, 386–387, 389}}</ref> With Carson's approval, editor Paul Brooks at [[Houghton Mifflin]] arranged for illustrations by [[Louis Darling|Louis]] and [[Lois Darling]], who also designed the cover. The final writing was the first chapter, "A Fable for Tomorrow", which was intended to provide a gentle introduction to a serious topic. By mid-1962, Brooks and Carson had largely finished the editing and were planning to promote the book by sending the manuscript to select individuals for final suggestions.<ref>{{harvnb|Lear|1997|pp=390–397}}</ref> In ''Silent Spring'', Carson relied on evidence from two New York state organic farmers, [[Marjorie Spock]] and Mary Richards, and that of [[biodynamic farming]] advocate [[Ehrenfried Pfeiffer]] in developing her case against DDT.<ref name=CarsonPaull/>
(B) ==Content==
1)The overarching theme of ''Silent Spring'' is the powerful{{mdash}}and often negative{{mdash}}effect humans have on the natural world.<ref name="Lytle 2007 166–7">{{harvnb|Lytle|2007|pp=166–167}}</ref> Carson's main argument is that pesticides have detrimental effects on the environment; she says these are more properly termed "[[biocide]]s" because their effects are rarely limited to solely targeting pests. DDT is a prime example, but other synthetic pesticides{{mdash}}many of which are subject to [[bioaccumulation]]{{mdash}}are scrutinized. Carson accuses the chemical industry of intentionally spreading disinformation and public officials of accepting industry claims uncritically. Most of the book is devoted to pesticides' effects on natural ecosystems, but four chapters detail cases of human [[pesticide poisoning]], cancer, and other illnesses attributed to pesticides.<ref>{{harvnb|Lytle|2007|pp=166–172}}</ref> About DDT and cancer, Carson says only:
2){{blockquote|In laboratory tests on animal subjects, DDT has produced suspicious liver tumors. Scientists of the Food and Drug Administration who reported the discovery of these tumors were uncertain how to classify them, but felt there was some "justification for considering them low grade hepatic cell carcinomas". Dr. Hueper [author of ''Occupational Tumors and Allied Diseases''] now gives DDT the definite rating of a "chemical carcinogen".<ref>{{harvnb|Carson|1962|p=225}}</ref>}}
3)Carson predicts increased consequences in the future, especially since targeted pests may develop [[resistance to pesticides]] and weakened ecosystems fall prey to unanticipated invasive species. The book closes with a call for a [[biotic material|biotic]] approach to pest control as an alternative to chemical pesticides.<ref>{{harvnb|Lytle|2007|pp=169, 173}}</ref>
4)Carson never called for an outright ban on DDT. She said in ''Silent Spring'' that even if DDT and other insecticides had no environmental side effects, their indiscriminate overuse was counterproductive because it would create insect resistance to pesticides, making them useless in eliminating the target insect populations:
5){{blockquote|No responsible person contends that insect-borne disease should be ignored. The question that has now urgently presented itself is whether it is either wise or responsible to attack the problem by methods that are rapidly making it worse. The world has heard much of the triumphant war against disease through the control of insect vectors of infection, but it has heard little of the other side of the story—the defeats, the short-lived triumphs that now strongly support the alarming view that the insect enemy has been made actually stronger by our efforts. Even worse, we may have destroyed our very means of fighting.<ref>{{harvnb|Carson|1962|p=266}}</ref>}}
6)Carson also said that "Malaria programmes are threatened by resistance among mosquitoes",<ref>{{harvnb|Carson|1962|p=267}}</ref> and quoted the advice given by the director of Holland's Plant Protection Service: "Practical advice should be 'Spray as little as you possibly can' rather than 'Spray to the limit of your capacity'. Pressure on the pest population should always be as slight as possible."<ref>{{harvnb|Carson|1962|p=275}}</ref>
(C)=== Politics ===
1)At the time the book was written, environmental issues were excluded from mainstream political conversation in America.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Carson |first=Rachel |title=Silent Spring |pages=348}}</ref> However, Carson believed that governments should consider what environmental impact a policy may have before implementing it, for example, in chapter 10 she describes a pesticide program from 1957 that was intended to control the spread of fire ants:<blockquote>With the development of chemicals of broad lethal powers, there came a sudden change in the official attitude towards the fire ant. In 1957 the United States Department of Agriculture launched one of the most remarkable publicity campaigns in its history. The fire ant suddenly became the target of a barrage of government releases, motion pictures, and government-inspired stories portraying it as a despoiler of southern agriculture and a killer of birds, livestock, and man. A mighty campaign was announced, in which the federal government in cooperation with the afflicted states would ultimately treat some 20,000,000 acres in nine southern states.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Carson |first=Rachel |title=Silent Spring |pages=177}}</ref></blockquote>Despite calls from experts to consider the damage using the pesticides could bring to the environment, the Agriculture Department dismissed the objections and continued on with the program:<blockquote>Urgent protests were made by most of the state conservation departments, by national conservation agencies, and by ecologists and even by some entomologists, calling upon the then Secretary of Agriculture, Ezra Benson, to delay the program at least until some research had been done to determine the effects of heptachlor and dieldrin on wild and domestic animals and to find the minimum amount that would control the ants. The protests were ignored and the program was launched in 1958. A million acres were treated the first year. It was clear that any research would be in the nature of a post mortem.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Carson |first=Rachel |title=Silent Spring |pages=180–181}}</ref></blockquote>After the program, an increased number of birds, cattle, horses and other wildlife were found dead in the areas where the pesticides had been sprayed.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Carson |first=Rachel |title=Silent Spring |pages=181–185}}</ref> To make matters worse, the heptachlor and dieldrin sprayed accomplished nothing, instead creating more infested areas.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Carson |first=Rachel |title=Silent Spring |pages=187}}</ref> Had the government researched the impact the chemicals could have on wildlife they could have prevented the deaths and environmental damage and saved the taxpayer's money.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Carson |first=Rachel |title=Silent Spring |pages=186}}</ref> Overall, ''Silent Spring'' not only uncovered the many negative effects pesticides have on the environment but also asked for environmental issues to be discussed and treated seriously within the political sphere.
|