성열이 욕설 파동이 언제까지 진행 될지 모르겟습니다..
이런것을 외교 참사다 뭐다........하이에나 쐣끼들 처럼 물고 늘어지는 민주주의파 들이나..
기억나지 않는다..mbc 보도참사다 며.........언론과의 전쟁으로 되 받아 치는 수구 꼴통파들이나...
정말 눈꼼만큼도 정이 가지 않습니다..
솔찍히 말 하면.......민주주의파 꼴통쇗끼들 하는 꼬라가지가 더 정 떨어져..
관에 들어간 여왕님 시체 보고 오지 못햇다....고......사대주의에 쩌러 악악거려 되는 모습은
이자들이 과연 자주와 민족을 그리도 씨불거여 왓던 년놈들의 모습인지.....도무지 상상조차 되지 않고..
야들이.....교주님 흠모 정신에만 쩌러....지들 교주 노무현과 여왕을 그만 혼돈한 것 아닌가 시포..
외 거......죶 맞을 한번 보고 나면 오이던 가지던 고추던 다 죶으로만 보인다고
교주님 흠모의 맛을 보고 나니.....모든 송장들이 다 교주님으로 보이는 것인가??
일본 제국주의의 식민 통치를 받앗고,,,그 통치를 치욕으로 여기며 민족의 자좀심과 정체성의
근거로 삼고 잇는 사람들이라면...
제국주의의 원조 수괴 ....영국 여왕의 참배를 두고 ...어쩔수 없는 국제간의 현실 때문에 참배 거부는 차마 못 하더라도....
관속의 송장을 봣니 마니 따위로...외교 참사다 뭐다 따위 쌈질은 할 수 없는 것 아니냐??
박진 외교부 장관이 무슨 죄가 잇나??
야가 왜 성렬이 때문에 짤려야 하지???
니들 문재인이 중국가서 혼자 밥 처 먹고 기어들어 왓다고 간경화 해임 하자고 햇더냐??
아니 왜 찌지리질은 대통령이 해 놓고....아래것들만 갖고 그래??
박진이 니들이 그토록 환장한 영국여왕 시체 기어코 보게 하려 햇는데 잘 않됫고,
니들이 그토록 원햇던 바이든 만나 회담하는 모습 기어코 연출 하여 햇는데 49초 회담으로 찌그러진것 박에 더 잇엇더냐??
다른소린 박진 싫다.............바로 그런 모습이 싫어 ...뭔 븅쉰쇗끼 혼자 꼴깝질도 아니고
그런데 니들은 그런짓 못 햇다고 해임 결의한것 아냐???
에라 이 ...................씨발놈드라...
-니들은 개쐐끼들이여...씨발놈드라.................김고은
아래는 반전단체 코드핑크의 미디어 밴야민의 글 입니다..
초상집에 와서 ....신중현의 아름다운 강산을 불려 되면.....참 눈치 없는 쇗끼라 욕 존나 처 먹지요..
세계의 지도자들은 un에서 무슨 말을 햇는지......죽 열거햇습니다..
물론 이런 말 말고도 다른 많은 말들도 햇겟지만....촛점은 반전과 평화임을 알 수 잇습니다..
즉.....초상집에서는 장성곡이 맞다는 것이지요.
우리의 찌지리 성렬이는.....un에 가서니...열씸히 열씸히 자유만 존나 씨불리고 오셧다는디..
그 원고 누가 써 줫는지...........
초상집에서 신중현이 부른 꼴이니....외교 참사라고 함은 이런것이 외교 참사지...
수구 꼴통횃끼들이야 뭐 본래 그런것들이니.........그런다 쳐
이 민주화 꼴통 쇗끼들의 이런 모습은 ....아직까지도 적응이 않되......왜??
다른소린 아직도 이 찌지리들이 6월의 거리에서 독제타도를 함께 외첫던 그 사람들일 것이다는 환상을 갖고 잇거덩..
첫 사랑에 대한 환상과 미련도 이런것이더라고........쌩 뵹쉰들의 환상
https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/09/30/end-war-in-ukraine-say-66-nations-at-un-general-assembly/
“End War in Ukraine” Say 66 Nations at UN General AssemblyB
by MEDEA BENJAMIN - NICOLAS J. S. DAVIES
Photo credit: UN
We have spent much of the past week reading and listening to speeches by world leaders at the UN General Assembly in New York. Most of them condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as a violation of the UN Charter and a serious setback for the peaceful world order that is the UN’s founding and defining principle.
But what has not been reported in the United States is that leaders from 66 countries, mostly from the Global South, also used their General Assembly speeches to call urgently for diplomacy to end the war in Ukraine through peaceful negotiations, as the UN Charter requires. We have compiled excerpts from the speeches of all 66 countries to show the breadth and depth of their appeals, and we highlight a few of them here.
African leaders echoed one of the first speakers, Macky Sall, the president of Senegal, who also spoke in his capacity as the current chairman of the African Union when he said, “We call for de-escalation and a cessation of hostilities in Ukraine, as well as for a negotiated solution, to avoid the catastrophic risk of a potentially global conflict.”
The 66 nations that called for peace in Ukraine make up more than a third of the countries in the world, and they represent most of the Earth’s population, including India, China, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Brazil and Mexico.
While NATO and EU countries have rejected peace negotiations, and U.S. and U.K. leaders have actively undermined them, the leaders of five European countries – Hungary, Malta, Portugal, San Marino and the Vatican – joined the calls for peace at the General Assembly.
The peace caucus also includes many of the small countries that have the most to lose from the breakdown of the UN system that recent wars in Ukraine and the Greater Middle East represent, and who have the most to gain by strengthening the UN and enforcing the UN Charter to protect the weak and restrain the powerful.
Philip Pierre, the Prime Minister of Saint Lucia, a small island state in the Caribbean, told the General Assembly,
“Articles 2 and 33 of the UN Charter are unambiguous in binding Member States to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state and to negotiate and settle all international disputes by peaceful means.…We therefore call upon all parties involved to immediately end the conflict in Ukraine, by undertaking immediate negotiations to permanently settle all disputes in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.”
Global South leaders lamented the failure of the UN system, not just in the war in Ukraine but throughout decades of war and economic coercion by the United States and its allies. President Jose Ramos-Horta of Timor-Leste directly challenged the West’s double standards, telling Western countries,
“They should pause for a moment to reflect on the glaring contrast in their response to the wars elsewhere where women and children have died by the thousands from wars and starvation. The response to our beloved Secretary-General’s cries for help in these situations have not met with equal compassion. As countries in the Global South, we see double standards. Our public opinion does not see the Ukraine war the same way it is seen in the North.”
Many leaders called urgently for an end to the war in Ukraine before it escalates into a nuclear war that would kill billions of people and end human civilization as we know it. The Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, warned,
“…the war in Ukraine not only undermines the nuclear non-proliferation regime, but also presents us with the danger of nuclear devastation, either through escalation or accident. … To avoid a nuclear disaster, it is vital that there be serious engagement to find a peaceful outcome to the conflict.”
Others described the economic impacts already depriving their people of food and basic necessities, and called on all sides, including Ukraine’s Western backers, to return to the negotiating table before the war’s impacts escalate into multiple humanitarian disasters across the Global South. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh told the Assembly,
“We want the end of the Russia-Ukraine war. Due to sanctions and counter-sanctions, …the entire mankind, including women and children, is punished. Its impact does not remain confined to one country, rather it puts the lives and livelihoods of the people of all nations in greater risk, and infringes their human rights. People are deprived of food, shelter, healthcare and education. Children suffer the most in particular. Their future sinks into darkness.
My urge to the conscience of the world – stop the arms race, stop the war and sanctions. Ensure food, education, healthcare and security of the children. Establish peace.”
Turkey, Mexico and Thailand each offered their own approaches to restarting peace negotiations, while Sheikh Al-Thani, the Amir of Qatar, succinctly explained how delaying negotiations will only bring more death and suffering:
“We are fully aware of the complexities of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and the international and global dimension to this crisis. However, we still call for an immediate ceasefire and a peaceful settlement, because this is ultimately what will happen regardless of how long this conflict will go on for. Perpetuating the crisis will not change this result. It will only increase the number of casualties, and it will increase the disastrous repercussions on Europe, Russia and the global economy.”
Responding to Western pressure on the Global South to actively support Ukraine’s war effort, India’s Foreign Minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, claimed the moral high ground and championed peaceful diplomacy,
“As the Ukraine conflict continues to rage, we are often asked whose side we are on. And our answer, each time, is straight and honest. India is on the side of peace and will remain firmly there. We are on the side that respects the UN Charter and its founding principles. We are on the side that calls for dialogue and diplomacy as the only way out. We are on the side of those struggling to make ends meet, even as they stare at escalating costs of food, fuel and fertilizers.
It is therefore in our collective interest to work constructively, both within the United Nations and outside, in finding an early resolution to this conflict.”
One of the most passionate and eloquent speeches was delivered by Congolese Foreign Minister Jean-Claude Gakosso, who summarized the thoughts of many, and appealed directly to Russia and Ukraine – in Russian!
“Because of the considerable risk of a nuclear disaster for the entire planet, not only those involved in this conflict but also those foreign powers who could influence events by calming them down, should all temper their zeal. They must stop fanning the flames and they must turn their backs on this type of vanity of the powerful which has so far closed the door to dialogue.
Under the auspices of the United Nations, we must all commit without delay to peace negotiations – just, sincere and equitable negotiations. After Waterloo, we know that since the Vienna Congress, all wars finish around the table of negotiation.
The world urgently needs these negotiations to prevent the current confrontations – which are already so devastating – to prevent them from going even further and pushing humanity into what could be an irredeemable cataclysm, a widespread nuclear war beyond the control of the great powers themselves – the war, about which Einstein, the great atomic theorist, said that it would be the last battle that humans would fight on Earth.
Nelson Mandela, a man of eternal forgiveness, said that peace is a long road, but it has no alternative, it has no price. In reality, the Russians and Ukrainians have no other choice but to take this path, the path of peace.
Moreover, we too should go with them, because we must throughout the world be legions working together in solidarity, and we must be able to impose the unconditional option of peace on the war lobbies.
(Next three paragraphs in Russian)
Now I wish to be direct, and directly address my dear Russian and Ukrainian friends.
Too much blood has been spilled – the sacred blood of your sweet children. It’s time to stop this mass destruction. It’s time to stop this war. The entire world is watching you. It’s time to fight for life, the same way that you courageously and selflessly fought together against the Nazis during World War Two, in particular in Leningrad, Stalingrad, Kursk and Berlin.
Think about the youth of your two countries. Think about the fate of your future generations. The time has come to fight for peace, to fight for them. Please give peace a real chance, today, before it is too late for us all. I humbly ask this of you.”
At the end of the debate on September 26, Csaba Korosi, the president of the General Assembly, acknowledged in his closing statement that ending the war in Ukraine was one of the main messages “reverberating through the Hall” at this year’s General Assembly.
You can read here Korosi’s closing statement and all the calls for peace he was referring to.
And if you want to learn more about the “legions working together in solidarity… to impose the unconditional option of peace on the war lobbies,” as Jean-Claude Gakosso said, you can find out more at https://www.peaceinukraine.org/.
Medea Benjamin is cofounder of CODEPINK for Peace, and author of several books, including Kingdom of the Unjust: Behind the US-Saudi Connection. Nicolas J. S. Davies is a writer for Consortium News and a researcher with CODEPINK, and the author of Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq