Why 2015’s Best Commodity Could Turn
Into This Year’s Nightmare
Last year’s best-performing commodity is poised to become the
market’s worst nightmare.
After the longest rally in London cocoa futures since at least
1989, farmers from Ivory Coast to Peru are preparing to revive supplies in the
2016-17 season that starts in October, creating a surplus that Rabobank
International says will be the largest in six years. With demand slowing, the
bank is most bearish about prices for the chocolate ingredient this year among
the dozen agricultural commodities it tracks.
Prices surged 60 percent during a four-year rally through
2015, forcing candy makers from Hershey Co. to Lindt & Spruengli AG to
charge more for their products. Last year, El Nino weather patterns left dry
conditions that hurt cocoa crops, including in West Africa, which produces about
70 percent of the world’s beans. London futures in December reached 2,332 pounds
($3,423) a metric ton, the most since 2011, when a civil war disrupted exports
from Ivory Coast, the top supplier.
“We expect these very good international prices to incentivize
production,” said Carlos Mera, an analyst at Rabobank in London. “We don’t think
these levels are justified given the political stability in West
Africa.”
Cocoa was an anomaly last year, rising 14 percent in London,
when almost every other major commodity tumbled. The gain was the biggest of the
24 commodities tracked by the Standard & Poor’s GSCI Spot Index, which slid
more than 25 percent. Rabobank says cocoa futures in London may slide to 1,800
pounds by the fourth quarter, down 17 percent from Tuesday’s close at 2,163
pounds.
Here are five reasons for the bearish outlook:
1. Farmer Profit
The government in Ivory Coast, which accounts for almost 40
percent of global production, raised prices paid to farmers for a third
consecutive year. Growers will get 1,000 CFA francs ($1.62) per kilogram during
the bigger of two annual harvests in the 2015-16 season, an 18 percent increase
from a year earlier.
It’s the first time farmers across the country have had such a
high fixed price for an entire growing season, said Edward George, head of soft
commodities research at Ecobank Transnational Inc., a lender based in Lome,
Togo. Previously, if prices ever got that high, they were only in certain areas
or didn’t last long, George said.
2. Weaker Demand
With the cost rising for chocolate makers, many have tapped
into inventories, cutting demand for new supplies. Global grindings by
processors, an indication of consumption, will probably be unchanged or rise as
little as 0.5 percent in the 2015-16 season that started Oct. 1, according to a
November estimate by Cargill Inc., the world’s second-biggest
processor.
Barry Callebaut AG, the top processor and largest maker of
bulk chocolate, is closing a factory in Thailand and reducing output in
Malaysia. The company said overcapacity, high prices and slowing demand made
grindings less profitable.
3. Rains Return
Dry conditions from El Nino probably will be replaced by a
more favorable La Nina pattern that will bring more moisture to cocoa crops,
according to MDA Weather Services. Three of five strong El Ninos since the 1950s
were followed by La Nina, said Kyle Tapley, a forecaster for MDA.
“As far as cocoa is concerned, La Nina generally leads to
wetter-than-normal conditions across West Africa,” Tapley said in an e-mailed
response to questions.
avav1
4. Latin America
While farmers in Ivory Coast and Ghana continue to dominate
supply, output is growing in Latin America. Countries in the region have been
planting high-yielding trees, according to the London-based International Cocoa
Organization. Production in Ecuador rose 6.8 percent in 2014-15, and expansion
is occurring in Colombia and Peru, the industry group said.
“Offers are starting to increase from places like Central
America as producers look to cocoa to replace coffee,” Jack Scoville, vice
president at Price Futures Group Inc. in Chicago, said by e-mail. “This is small
now but has really gained traction over the last couple of years and will
expand.”
5. Surplus Ahead
After a production deficit of about 150,000 tons in the
2015-16 season that started in October, the world will soon have more supply
than it needs. Output will exceed demand by 93,000 tons in the 2016-17 season,
according to Rabobank. That would be the biggest glut since
2010-11.
Source: Bloomberg
Seaborne iron ore pellet premiums level
out as fundamentals improve
Seaborne iron ore pellet premiums were unchanged for a third
week, as fundamentals appeared to be changing, with supply showing signs of
easing and some demand emerging.
Platts assessed the spot blast furnace pellet premium against
62% Fe Iron Ore Index, or IODEX, at $10.60/dmt CFR North China Wednesday, after
adjustment to 65% Fe basis, steady week on week.
The assessed pellet premium was normalized to typical
specifications of 65% iron, 0.35% alumina, 5% silica, 0.02% phosphorus and
0.003% sulfur.
Physical properties specified by the assessment are 250 cold
crushing strength or CCS and a maximum sizing of 2.5% under 5 mm.
“I am hearing that Ukrainian pellet supply is reducing,
possibly because not that many producers can actually keep up with the current
low prices,” a Hebei-based steelmaker said.
“If this is true, we might see some stability or even
improvement in pellet premiums, but this is also doubtful because it is tough to
find buyers in China who really want to accept such expensive feedstock when
they have cheaper alternatives like lump.”
Additionally, with wintry conditions in China, domestic
concentrate production has been falling. That has caused a decline in available
raw material which Chinese mills can use to pelletize, sharpening the market’s
appetite for imported pellet, with demand heard to be on the rise after a
lengthy period of weakening.
“Pellet is actually not that expensive now for a mill like
us,” a steelmaker in central China said. “Our pelletization costs are around
$15/dmt and more expensive than other mills. So, imported pellet cargoes are
better for us in terms of lowering our costs.”
The steelmaker also said it was buying pellet from Australia
in smaller lots and was planning to increase its uptake of imported pellet due
to higher pelletization costs.
Seaborne pellet premiums still likely had a little room to
fall because supply still outperformed demand, the steelmaker said. “But once
supply eases, we will start to see support.”
A steelmaker in eastern China said it made sense for mills to
use more pellet now, adding it had increased the proportion of pellet used in
blast furnaces because the cost of such material had fallen so
much.
“I have received some buying inquiries for seaborne pellet
cargoes. They are more popular compared to pellet material at the ports as
premiums have gone down a lot for imported shipments,” a Beijing-based trader
said.
Since the start of assessments by Platts on October 7, 2015,
pellet premiums have almost halved in value, having fallen $8.65/dmt, or
45%.
Source: Platts
China iron ore futures fall as buying
slows; steel dips
Chinese iron ore futures dropped on Wednesday, with demand in
the world’s top consumer expected to weaken amid deepening output cuts by steel
mills.
Chinese mills have curbed steel production and slowed
purchases of steelmaking raw material iron ore due to a persistent cash crunch
and weak sales.
The most active May iron ore futures contract on the Dalian
Commodity Exchange was 1.6 percent lower at 317.5 yuan ($48.51) a tonne by the
midday break. “The rapid rebound that has driven spot prices to above $40 a
tonne has come to an end, and the supply glut for iron ore in the medium term
has not changed,” said Wang Yilin, an analyst with Sinosteel Futures in
Beijing.
Spot iron ore for immediate delivery to China’s Tianjin port
tumbled 2.3 percent to $42.10 a tonne on Tuesday, posting the biggest daily drop
in one month, according to The Steel Index (TSI).
The benchmark rebar futures contract for May settlement on the
Shanghai Futures Exchange had dipped 0.2 percent to 1,774 yuan a tonne by the
midday break.
Rebar and iron ore prices at 0332 GMT
Contract Last Change Pct
Change
SHFE REBAR MAY6 1774 -4.00
-0.22
DALIAN IRON ORE DCE DCIO MAY6 317.5 -5.00
-1.55
THE STEEL INDEX 62 PCT INDEX 42.1 -1.00
-2.32
METAL BULLETIN INDEX 43.11 -1.26
-2.84
Dalian iron ore and Shanghai rebar in yuan/tonne
Index in dollars/tonne, show close for the previous trading
day
Source: Reuters
India’s coal imports fall for sixth
straight month in December
India’s coal imports fell for a sixth month in December, a
government official said Wednesday, as the world’s third-biggest buyer of the
fuel expands domestic mines to boost output and expand power
generation.
India shipped in 12.35 million tonnes of coal last month, a
34.3 percent decline from the same month a year ago. Imports slipped thanks to a
jump in production by state-run Coal India (COAL.NS), the world’s biggest miner
of the fuel that is opening one new mine a month as the government fast-tracks
environmental clearances.
“Record coal production by Coal India leads to further
reduction in imports,” Coal Secretary Anil Swarup tweeted.
Coal India’s April-December production grew by a record 9
percent, keeping the country on course to reduce annual imports for the first
time in five years.
Source: Reuters
Thermal Coal-Markets start 2016 warily
as demand outlook remains bleak
Thermal coal prices started the new year warily with physical
cargo values around $50 per tonne and futures testing $40 a tonne for the first
time since 2003, as last year’s commodity rout spills into 2016.
Physical coal cargoes for prompt shipment from Australia’s
Newcastle terminal last settled at $50.35 a tonne, below levels seen during the
global credit crisis of 2008/2009.
But prices for cargoes from South Africa’s Richards Bay
terminal jumped almost 7 percent from late December to $53 as demand from its
main buyer India was strong and domestic coal mining output remained volatile
due to frequent disruptions to power supplies.
The weakest of the main physical coal prices were European,
where cargoes for delivery into Amsterdam, Rotterdam or Antwerp (ARA) were at
$48.20 a tonne, also below 2008/2009 levels.
“Demand for coal in Europe remains weak due to significantly
warmer than average temperatures,” said commodities brokerage Marex
Spectron.
Meteorological data shows that Europe’s winter has so far been
much milder than usual, although a current cold spell could last until later in
January.
The overall mild weather has been in large part due to the
global El Nino weather phenomenon which causes mild weather across the northern
hemisphere.
Reflecting an expectation that prices will not rise anytime
soon because of falling demand and ample supplies, benchmark API2 2017 coal
futures were not far off $40 a tonne, down over 80 percent since their historic
peak in 2008 and to a level not seen since 2003.
“The macroeconomic conditions do not offer any support …
Manufacturing activity in key coal consuming countries has slowed,” Marex
Spectron said, referring to a slowdown in growth especially in coal-reliant
Asia.
Consultancy FGE said that coal demand in the world’s top
consumer China was slowing due to “a slowdown of the economy and in an effort to
control air pollution, including shutting down coal-fired power plants and
capping their running hours to give way to renewable power”.
While most commodities from oil to copper and iron have seen
prices tumbling on the back of supplies exceeding demand, the coal sector has
been hit particularly hard as, unlike other commodities, many analysts do not
believe that its demand will ever fully revive.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) said in December that
coal consumption in China had likely peaked, paving the way for a decline in
global use even as India becomes the main driver for demand.
Source: Reuters
How the Energy component spearhead
Commodities price slump in 2015?
2015 has been one of the worst years for commodities as it
sent ripples in economies across the world. Interestingly, the downward journey
of commodities has been led by energy commodities.
The energy component of the widely followed S&P Goldman
Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI) fell 41% from the start of 2015, a larger decline
than the industrial metals, grains, and precious metals components, which
declined 24%, 19%, and 11%, respectively, in 2015.
“Weakness in global economic growth contributed to the overall
decline in commodity markets in 2015, but unique supply-side factors within
certain commodity markets also affected prices,” according to the US Energy
Information Administration(EIA).
Each of the 16 commodities in the S&P GSCI Energy, Grains,
Industrial Metals, and Precious Metals indices declined in 2015, with prices of
some of the energy commodities falling more than 30%.
Nickel, diesel, and crude oil had the largest price declines
among the 16 commodities in the four S&P GSCI indices, while lead, corn,
precious metals, and gasoline had relatively smaller price declines. Each
commodity in the S&P GSCI is reweighted each year based on the commodity’s
world production and trading volume to measure its relative importance in the
global economy.
첫댓글 감사
감사합니다.