유행하는 언어..

[다른소리]

언어에도 유행이 잇는듯 합니다.

다른소리 젊을때 제국주의란 단어가 대단한 유행어엿습니다.

미 제국주의...서구 제국주의....일본제국주의..

혹자는 소련도 제국주의라며 퉁처서 빈정거리기도 햇고

한나 아렌트는 ..공산권의 제국주의적 속성을 주장하여  그들 자본주의 제국주의자들의 죄의식을 경감시켜 주엇고 더욱 더 뻔뻔하게 만들엇지요.

동구권 붕괴와 함께 이 제국주의란 단어도 함께 사라져 버린듯 합니다..

미국과 서구국가들이 대오각성하여 제국주의 근성을 갑자기 사라져 버렷고...공존 공영과 평화로운 세상을 추구 하기 시작 햇기 때문이엇다면 ...춤추고 노래해야 할 일이겟지만

동구권 붕괴이후의 세상의 흐름은 정 반대로 흘럿습니다..

미국은 자신들의 제국주의를 더 이상 감추지도 않습니다...

-꼬우면 니들도 해..

-좆도 못하는 것들이 말만 많어..

이게 뭐 뒷골목 야구자 쇗끼들도 아니고....갈수록 천박해 지고...차마 눈 뜨고 봐줄 수 조차 없는 지경입니다.

유니폴라의 시대의 제국주의는 더욱 극성을 부리게 되엇지만 

신경을 쓸 상대가 사라져 버린 무주공산에서의  상대방에 대한 욕설이 무슨의미가 잇습니까??

시합이 끝난 이후의 패자의 변명 같은 ...비열함만 느끼게 하지요..

제국주의 단어 사용의 소멸은 그런 것입니다.

그런데 ..

세상은 또 바꿧습니다..

소련과는 또 다른 성격의 중국의 부상과  멀티포라의 세계는 이전 냉전시대와는 또 다른 질서를 만들고 잇고

사라졋던 단어  제국주의를 다시 환기 시켯습니다..

바뀐것이 없다..

지금이야 말로 제국주의를 제대로 이해 하고, 힘을 합쳐 각자의 주권을 지키고 브록의 이익을 추구 해야 한다는  무언의 동의가

현실화 되기 시작 한 것이지요.

제국주의가 무엇인가??

이런것에 대한 이해도 과거 식민지대의 제국주의와는 당연히 다릅니다..

바뀐 환경과 바뀐 제국주의의 구현 방식에 따라 그 이해도 달라짐은 당연합니다.

한인들은 일본 제국주의 침략의 직격탄을 맞앗지만...

정작 제국주의에 대한 이해가 전무한 참 기이한 종자들이라고 햇지요??

일제 강점기 36년이 ...민족의 주권과 제국주의에 대한 거부나 항거 가 아닌  쩍팔이 쐣끼들과의  종자적 우열을 가르는 싸움질로 바꿔 버렷습니다..

제국주의에 대한 비판 = 중북 주사파 좌파...라는 정치적 이념적 프레임 때문만도 아닙니다..

한인들의 제국주의에 대한 백치적 무식은 ...그 만큼 공부하지 않고 깨으르고 저급하기 때문입니다..

제국주의에 대한 이해가 ...꼴 패미들의 페미니즘에도 미치지 못하는  천박하고 무심 하고 유행적이다는 이유 말고 다른 이유가 잇다면 다른소리를 설득해 보시기 바랍니다..

아래글에서 필자는 데모크라시 나오의 앵커 에미 굿맨을 포함한 진보 진영의 많은 사람들이 사실상 미국의 제국주의적 시각을  

공유하고 지원하고 잇다고 통박햇습니다..

미국이 공격하는 정권의 독제성과 반 인권적인 측면을 인정하고 미국의 제국주의적 접근에 동조한다는 것이지요. 

-일제가 조선을 식민 통치할 충분한 이유가 잇다.........그런 것이지요

야들이 서로 싸우는 듯 보이지요??

야들이 하는 방식이 지금의 제국주의자들의 방식이지요..

자신들이 암묵적으로 설정해 놓은 딱 그 선 안에서의 싸움..

이런것들은 논쟁은 왜 그리 역거운지..

https://orinocotribune.com/anti-imperialism-in-the-us-today-what-it-is-and-is-not/

Stansfield Smith

Stansfield Smith is a Chicago based anti-imperialist activist. He was active for over a decade in the Chicago Committee to Free the Cuban 5. His work is now on ChicagoALBASolidarity.wordpress.com. He has written on Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador for the Council on Hemispheric Affairs and on North Korea for Counterpunch and others.

Cuban 5 는 큐바의 5인방을 말 하는 것입니다.

다른소린 이들에 대한 이야기를 여러차레 글로 올려드렷습니다

https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1002270970

美, 쿠바 스파이 또 석방…'5인방' 두 명 풀려나

Anti-Imperialism in the US Today: What It Is and Is Not

 FEBRUARY 12, 2024 

Democracy Now’s anchor Amy Goodman. Photo: Democracy Now.

Fidel Castro, the world recognizes as a historic anti-imperialist figure, repeatedly warned that the main danger to humanity is US imperialism: “There is an enemy that can be called universal, an enemy whose attitude and whose actions…threaten the whole world, bully the whole world, that universal enemy is Yankee imperialism.”

He fought to build a world united front against imperialism, of the world’s peoples and countries to oppose the barbarous actions of US imperialism. We see that anti-imperialist unity right now with United Nations votes and worldwide protests against the US-Israeli slaughters in Gaza, in what the New York Times in 2003 called “a second superpower.” 

The US empire is opposed to not just revolutionary movements, but to any struggles that place national sovereignty above the interests of the US corporations. 미 제국은 혁명적인 운동에 반대 할 뿐만 아니라 미국 기업의 이익보다 국가 주권을 우선시하는 어떤 투쟁에도 반대한다. The US may pretend the issue is the defense of democracy and human rights, but its only concern is obedience to its dictates. (미국은 민주주의나 인권의 보호의 문제인양 치장하지만  미국의 유일한 걱정은 그들의 지시에 대해 복종하는가, 하지 안는가 뿐이다) 

Imperialism uses human rights and democracy issues in countries it targets for “regime change” as a rationale for foreign interference. It cooks up human rights horror stories – killings of students in Nicaragua in 2018, Qaddafi’s plans for mass rape and murder in Libya, Hamas mass killing and rape of civilians on October 7, Chinese genocide in Xinjiang, Iran’s killing of Mahsa Amin in 2022, Evo Morales stealing an election in 2019, Cuba’s repression of mass protests in 2021, Russia’s “unprovoked” intervention into Ukraine, Syria’s Assad chemical weapons attack on his own people, Venezuela’s President Maduro fixing elections, Chavez’ supporters killing protestors in 2002, and on and on. The only truth is that the US corporate media constantly lies to us to win support for their interventions.

How Progressives Legitimize Imperialist “Regime Change” Propaganda
Many progressive people swallow and even join in these disinformation campaigns in countries the US targets for regime change. They are not simply calling out human rights abuses “from the left,” but help legitimize US propaganda stories, becoming witting or unwitting conveyor belts for them into our movement. As a result, people come to believe that a country targeted for “regime change” may be unworthy of our solidarity against US aggression. Cast aside is the key issue: the US empire has no right to intervene in other countries, period. 

In contrast, anti-imperialists focus on uncovering and bringing to light US disinformation and interference in the national sovereignty of other countries. For instance, what was sold as a popular uprising against Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega “dictatorship” was financed with hundreds of millions of US government dollars, or that the White Helmets, alleged “humanitarian” group in the Syrian “revolution,” was funded by the British and US governments and its leader connected to British intelligence MI6.

Some progressives’ back-handed apologetics for imperialist regime change date back at least to Leon Trotsky, who proclaimed, for example, “I consider the main source of danger to the USSR in the present international situation to be Stalin and the oligarchy headed by him.” (Stalin After the Finnish Experience, March 13, 1940) Whatever your view on Stalin’s conduct in the 1930s, the world knew that Hitler planned to annihilate Soviet Russia, welcomed by imperial Britain, France, and the US, before, and even after the Soviet Union was a World War II ally. But to Trotsky, the main danger to Russia and the revolution was the dictatorship, not imperialism.

This approach of criticizing leaderships of targeted countries, not imperialist aggression, and not organizing movements against it, is too common among progressives today. It portrays an elementary lack of anti-imperialist consciousness. 

Anti-imperialists understand that no country can have any real democracy – whatever you imagine that is – because the US is constantly working to impose subservient governments throughout the world.

(반제국주의자들의 시각에서 스탈린이나 모택동의 독제에 대해 퍽 관대 합니다.

소련 내전 기간동안 900만명 이상이 사망한 것으로 봅니다.

중국의 국공내전 기간동안(중국혁명전쟁) 희생자는  중일 전쟁 기간동안의 희생자들 보다 더 많습니다.

이들이 그 처절하고 참혹한 전쟁을 통해 얻엇던 최고의 교훈이라면 두말 할 것도 없이

그들-제국주의자들-지금의 자유 민주주의 체체 국가들은 - 결코 자신들을 가만 두지 않을 것이다..는 공포감이엇습니다.

그들의 침략을 막아내고 혁명을 보전하기 위해서는 그들을 능가하는 물자와 무기가 필요햇지만,,이런것을 얻기 위해서는 절대적인 시간과 투자가 필요햇습니다..

그들에게 독재와 인권탄압 전체주의적 방식은  이런 간극을 메꿀수 잇는 어쩜 필수적인 것이엿는지 모르지요..

(한국의 박정희 독제도 그렇게 이해 할 수 없나??....여러분이 판단하시기 바랍니다)

문제는,, 제국주의라는 외부의 힘이지...혁명의 내부의 문제가 아니라는 것이지요.

과거 운동권 출신들이 제도권 정치에 합류 하면서 ...이런식의 논쟁을 급속하게 사라져 버렷습니다.

실제 권력이던 잠재적 권력이던, 권력의 주변에서 얼쩡거리다 보니 ...미 제국주의자가 주도하는 세계질서를 기본으로 인정하지 않을 수 없게 된 것이지요..

이들이 제국주의의 침략성 보다는 자신들의 모순이나 독제성에 더 촛점을 맞추는 것은 어쩜 당연해 보입니다.

-문제는 일제가 아닌 조선의 봉건성이다.....일제 36년은 당연한 결과이다..

이런식의 양보가 하나 둘씩 이루어 지면서...한때 맹렬햇던 주권의식이 교조적인 민족감정으로 퇴화된 것입니다..

독도, 명성황후, 위안부 타령 따위는 ....이런 퇴화의 마지막 잔존물입니다..

The empire regards the world as its domain, possessing 800-900 military bases outside its own borders. US imperialism is ever vigilant looking for a chance to overturn a “disobedient” government. “History teaches too eloquently that those who forget this do not survive the error,” said Castro. When targeted countries live under this ever-present threat, how can freedom and democracy flourish? They are forced to take measures to protect their people’s human right to national sovereignty.

Do targeted countries commit actual abuses? How could peoples ruled for centuries by imperial overlords, who treated them as human animals, not commit abuses when suddenly they came to power and had to deal with constant imperial pressure to overthrow them again? Even with outstanding revolutionary leaders such as Cuba’s Fidel, or Russia under Lenin, abuses were committed. Anti-imperialists place the blame where it primarily belongs: not on targets of US imperialism, but on centuries of imperialist abuse of their peoples – which only continued once those peoples came to power.

Many Progressives’ Failure to Grasp US Imperialism’s Tools for Intervention
The US uses many tools to interfere in countries, turning to military invasion as a last resort when all else fails. The world’s leaders constantly experience this US meddling. Yet US people, even progressives, have little grasp of its scope. Julian Assange, who remains imprisoned for his invaluable work, gave us some idea of how the US rulers operate behind our backs.

The US also intervenes through CIA-involved coups – at least 27 operations just in Latin America in the 21st century, almost all unknown to the public. The CIA and military spy agencies possess a publicly admitted budget of $100 billion for coups, assassinations, and other undercover terrorist actions against countries the corporate media lambasts as “human rights violators”.

US corporations bribe foreign government figures to sell out their people’s well-being to US interests. We know very little about how they constantly squeeze and blackmail governments, though Confessions of an Economic Hitman provides examples. 

Few progressives understand how the US rulers weaponize their control of the international banking and trade system to wreck other economies. They have the power to shut down a country’s foreign trade and foreign funding. The US blockades countries, and forces other nations to comply – North Korea since 1950, and Cuba since 1962. It blockades Syria, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela, even kidnapping their businesspeople as “money launderers” for engaging in legal trade. It employs economic warfare on 30 more countries, causing genuine human rights problems. Clearly, no country fighting to survive under these conditions can permit unrestricted freedom and democracy. That was first brought home by the benevolence and democracy of the Paris Commune, which enabled its enemies to crush it, slaughtering over 30,000 Communards.

The US uses its domination of the world media to paint targeted governments as nefarious actors. It controls nine of the top ten media companies, along with the internet and social media, such as Google, Twitter, and Facebook. Worldwide, they spread disinformation packaged as “news,” often a more effective weapon than US military might. Caitlin Johnstone noted, “Before they launch missiles, they launch propaganda campaigns. Before they roll out tanks, they roll out narratives.” These form an integral part of war campaigns, softening up our opposition to interventions, often so skillfully that they garner support for intervention among anti-war forces – witness the Libya, Syria, and Ukraine wars.

-러시아 놈들이 한살짜리 여자아이 강간햇다....까야야야야.......악..........................

 so skillfully !!!

We know little of their use of US and foreign NGOs, both government and corporate funded ones, to influence a targeted nation’s community and popular organizations, as it did with environmental and indigenous groups seeking to overthrow Ecuador’s Rafael Correa and Bolivia’s Evo Morales. Even the “Arab Spring” of 2011 was manipulated to impose pro-imperialist regimes.

소위말하는 색깔혁명...우쿠라인의 메이던 혁명등도 반 제국주의자들의 시각에서는 미제의 조작일 뿐이지요.

홍콩 민주화 시위때의 홍콩 경찰의 모습

광주항쟁 시민 단체들은 이들 홍콩인들의 시위를 홍콩의 광주항쟁이라고 햇지요..

약들을 처 먹엇나...

이 홍콩의 민주화 시위를 주도 햇던 학생들은 거의 다 미국에 건너가 좋은 대학에서 장학금 받아 처 먹어 가면서 학창생활을 즐겻고, 졸업후는 합중국 정부가 마련한 좋은 일자리에서 일을 하며 대 짱꼴라 비난 선전을  계속하고 잇습니다..

민주주의??

만약에 미국에서 경찰이 저 지경이 되도록 시위대에 처 맞앗다면...그들 미국의 민주주의자들은 뭐라고 씨불 거렷을까요??

We know even less of this government and corporate funding and manipulation of alternative and progressive media outlets in our own country.

The proper work of anti-imperialists is uncovering and educating other working people about US coup attempts and terrorist actions, corporate arm-twisting of foreign figures, the weaponizing of international banking and finance through the dollar’s continued dominance, and the use of NGOs as regime change tools. This is authentic anti-imperialist work, not critiquing victimized countries’ real or concocted human rights abuses or their responses to US aggression.

The Rulers tell us in Advance who they Plan to “Regime Change”
It is no mystery for progressive people who the US empire will target for “regime change” – it is typically well-publicized in advance with media propaganda onslaughts about abuses in some countries. Or we are given direct statements, as when Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman interviewed General Wesley Clark in 2007, who revealed the US had planned in 2001 not just to attack Afghanistan, but seven other countries: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran, which it then did.

위슬리 클락..

Or, in 2008, Congress publicly approved President Bush’s request for $400 million “to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran.” A year later, the anti-government Green Movement broke out, followed by US-backed protests in 2017-19 and 2022. In 2012, Ron Paul detailed in Congress military plans to overthrow the Syrian government. Oliver Stone’s widely viewed 2016 film Ukraine on Fire examined the US-instigated coup by anti-Russian fascists, which overthrew a neutral government and installed a pro-NATO government threatening Russia.

Yet those public forewarnings did not stop many in the movement from supporting wars on these countries, including Amy Goodman herself. They often disguised both the US role and their support, even adapting the language of the empire itself: not as imperial wars against “disobedient” countries, but as popular democratic movements against dictatorship. In fact, many who declare themselves sworn enemies of the US empire nevertheless oppose the same governments as our imperial overlords: Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Russia, China, Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Building a united world front against imperialist brutality seems alien to them.

These progressive people’s approach to imperial war: initial opposition to imperial warmongering, then later support as the war propaganda heightens, camouflaging US-backed intervention as democracy and self-determination movements, harkens back to Marxist parties’ conduct a century ago, when they opposed imperial war until it broke out in 1914. They then squirreled around creating justifications for their betrayal.

처음엔 제국주의 전쟁에 반대한다.. 이후 전쟁의 선전선동이 고조되면 지지한다, 미국이 지원하는 군사개입을 민주주의와 자결 운동으로 위장하고, 1914년 1차 대전이 발생하기 전 까지는 제국주의 전쟁에 반대했던 1 세기 전 의 마르크스주의 정당의 행동으로 되돌아 간다.((--1차대전 이전의 막스주의 정당들은 제국주의 전쟁에 반대하는 듯 보엿쓰나 막상 전쟁이 터지자 죄다 제국주의 전쟁에 참가하여 자신들의 나라의 승리를 위해  되질때 까지 싸웟다....)) 그리고 나서 그들의 배신에 대한 정당성을 만들어내기 위해 이리저리 쏴 돌아 다닌다..

While this illustrates the lack of anti-imperialist consciousness of many First World progressives, it also highlights corporate media’s power to sway peace advocates to support US imperial regime change – even while believing they are not. It shows the ease US rulers can still manipulate anti-war sentiment. 

Anti-Imperialists must be vigilant in defending National Sovereignty against US Empire’s Operations
Anti-imperialists oppose US meddling in the national sovereignty of other countries. It is the business of the peoples of other lands to solve their own problems, their fundamental democratic right to decide their country’s future by themselves. We must forever demand that the US leave them alone, so they can carry out their task. That is the most effective way we can defend their human rights.

Our task is building a movement that moves the Pentagon’s now over one trillion dollar budget from wrecking other countries to ending homelessness and hunger here, providing free national health care, affordable housing, and free education through university, often human rights enjoyed by the peoples in countries the US seeks to overthrow.

The anti-imperialist, anti-war, and human rights movement here would be much more developed, more powerful, more tied to world revolutionary struggles if the time progressives spent on the defects of countries the US targets were instead devoted to exposing US interference in those peoples’ lives. We need to explain to our fellow working people the methods the US rulers use behind our backs for “regime change,” and for manipulating progressive and working-class movements here at home.

We see an inkling of a world united front against imperialism with the movement against the US-Israeli barbarity in Gaza, one which also exposes the habitual deceit of corporate media. The $18 billion the US provided to maintain Israeli apartheid in 2023 was almost the $20 billion needed to end homelessness here. The $111 billion spent just since 2022 for Ukraine war, which many progressives did support  – with Biden wanting $60 billion more – could make public university free ($79 billion a year) and end hunger ($25 billion as of 2016). UN climate scientists say $300 billion a year would stop the rise in greenhouse gases, a mere quarter of the US military budget. We can never achieve these humanitarian goals while the US rulers know they can sway progressives with their regime change propaganda. But we can achieve them by developing an anti-imperialist stand of unconditionally opposing all US empire’s schemes for “regime change.”

[하키키]

https://v.daum.net/v/20240213114231333
어휴...저냥반이 재조명받을꺼리나 있나;;;;

[다른소리]

문화전쟁이라고 햇지요..

쩌쪽놈들이 ..서울의 봄, 길위의 김대중 따위로 힛트 쳣다고 생각하니...우리도 이승만 띠우자...
그런 심보 겟지요..

모든것이 정치화 되어 피박터지게 싸우는 시대입니다.
어차피 정치적 패쌈질 말고는 의미 없습니다..

객관적 사실과 평가 기준이 중요한 것이 아니고
어느편이냐??....가 모든것을 결정합니다..

이쪽이라도 다를것도 없고

주은래의 말 맛다나 ..시간이 앞으로도 한 200년 정도는 더 흐른 다음에나 ...어찌 말 해 볼 수 잇을까??

아마도 그 때즘 되면 ....사람들에게 이승만이란 이름이 기억이나 될 런지 모르겟습니다.
그럴 가치라도 잇는 사람인지..

놔 두세요..
광기는 풀어야 환자에게 좋지요..