말짱하게 나타난 그녀.....예수가 환장할 부활의 향연

[다른소리]

https://news.v.daum.net/v/20211122165259807

[특파원 리포트] '실종설' 中 스타의 영화 같은 19일..그녀에게 무슨 일이 있었나?

또 한번 부활의 향연이 벌어지고 잇습니다...

중국과 북한에서는 사라졋다 말짱하게 부활한 사람들이 하두 많아서니...

부활도 못 하는 년놈들은 사람 취급도 못 받을 지경입니다.

이 여인은 그들의 기대와는 다르게....쥐도 새도 모르게 사라진 것도 아니고

모처에 끌려가 사상교육을 받은 것도 아니고...

말짱하게 부활하여 기어 나왓습니다..

말짱하다고 사진을 내 보여도, 비됴를 보여 주어도...안 믿습니다.

그리고 말짱하게 나왓는데 이제는 여전히 의혹이 해소 된 것이 아니라고 합니다.

쪽팔진줄이나 쫌 알앗쓰면 좋겟습니다..

짱꼴라 놈들이 역겨 잇쓰니...옳다구나 하고 ...쌩 지뤌판을 벌렷는데....말짱하니..

-우리가 경우없이 반 미친년 개소리에 휘둘려서 쪽 팔린다...좆같다....

하면 될 일입니다...

그런데 ..그러기엔 주어담기에 너무 나간 탓일까요..

여전히 의혹이 남앗다고 합니다...

이 여인의 안전과 성 추문이 여전히 풀린것이 아니다는....집요함을 보입니다.

-니가 도적놈이다...난 니가 도적놈이 아니다는 증거가 필요하다......는 것이지요.

전형적인 노문교 똥파리때들의 수법입니다.

도적놈이 아니다는 증거 내 놓으라 며 때 거지로 개 염뵹질 떨기 전에..

먼저 도적놈이다는 증거부터 제시 하는 기본으로 돌아 가자고......응??

이 쏘ㅜ발놈드라....

에효..

뭐 이젠 이런 말 하기도 지겨워 죽겟써...

한마디로 줄여 봅시다

이일이 중국이 아닌 곳에서 발생 햇다면...이리도 집요하게 인권씩이나 나발 거리며 때거지로 쌩 지뤌판을 벌렷겟느냐??

Human right selected is human right rejected.-----said Other Voice.

선택적 인권은 인권이 아닙니다.................다른소리.

아래글은...

왜 서구인들이 중국에 대한 신뢰를 하지 못하는가....그 이유중 하나를 그들과 다른 언론의 차이로 설명한 글입니다.

당연히 서구인들의 기준으로 중국의 언론은 비판의 대상이지만,  언론의 상품화와 시장화가 과연 옳은 방향인가는 

또 다른 문제입니다. 

서구 언론은....상업언론입니다.....

한 마디로 말하면 언론이 아니고....언론을 상품화해서 팔아 처 먹은 장사치들입니다.

이들 언론 장사치들은 독자가 어떤 기사를 원하는지...어떤 식으로 기술 되기를 원하는지를 귀신같이 알아내고...그 needs에 맞는 기사를 작성해서 뿌리고 독자들의 관심을 모으고 돈을 챙깁니다.

그런데 중국언론은 그런 상업언론과는 전혀 다릅니다.

그런식으로 기사를 쓰지도 않고 그럴 필요도 없지요.

서구인들은 이런것을 언론 자유라고 합니다.

중국에는 이런 언론의 자유가 없다고 합니다..

중국에는 서구식의 언론이 없는 것은 맞습니다.

하지만 서구식의 언론이 자유로운 언론이다는 소리는 개가 웃다 되질 소립니다.

나는 공산당이 싫어요....ㅋㅋㅋ

이딴것이 기사 꺼립니까??

짱꼴라 놈들은 ..시 진핑의 일거수 일투족은 눈물이 겨울 만큼 기사를 만들어 내지만 이딴것을 언론의 자유랍시고 기사 안 만듭니다.

왜 이런것이 기사가 안 되냐고 ...깽깽거리는 것은 당신들의 기호이지...중국애들 밥맛은 아니라고.....응??

왜 니들 입맛에 맞춰 짱골라가 덩 달아 춤을 처 줘야 하는데.....이 등쉰쇗끼드라...

중국은 모든 부분에서 서구을 앞서가지만, 언론의 대응방식이나 관료성은 19세기 언론을 벗이나지 못 합니다.

본시 언론에 대한 공산주의자들의 시각 부터가 서구완 다르고...

서구 언론 처럼 상품이 아니기 때문에 수요자의 니드와 원트를 맞춰 진화 발전(?)을 할 필요를 느끼지 못 하기 때문입니다.

그러다 보니.....서구 언론 상품에만 익숙해 온 놈들의 입장에서는

어느날 쥐도 새도 모르게 사라졋다...다시 부활하는 일이 다 반사로 일어납니다..

그런데 중국을 이해 하려는 쪽이 당신들이라면.

당신들이 중국의 언론에 대해 먼저 적응해야 하는 것 아니냐고......응??

Why China is losing the war of words with the West

Tom Fowdy

is a British writer and analyst of politics and international relations with a primary focus on East Asia.

An unconvincing attempt to explain the disappearance of tennis player Peng Shuai highlights how poor China is at communications. This failing explains why the West is constantly able to set a damaging narrative about Beijing.

Chinese tennis star Peng Shuai disappeared from public view following allegations of sexual assault she directed at a Chinese government official, prompting a concerned response from many in the game, including former world number one Naomi Osaka.

While it’s not uncommon for celebrities in China to ‘disappear’ if they have created a political controversy – a prominent recent example was businessmen Jack Ma – it is unlikely, given the circumstances, that Peng has been arrested or won’t be seen again. However, what is undeniable is that China isn’t helping its own case with its response to the story.

On Wednesday evening, broadcaster CGTN published on its social media platforms in the West an email purportedly sent to the Women’s Tennis Association from the player, in which she said she was OK and merely “resting”.

The problem was that the email was not convincing at all, and appeared as if it were a screenshot because a hovering cursor was visible. Predictably, the Western media piled on this botched public-relations effort, which lacked credibility, and used it to advance their narrative against China. Significantly, even supporters of that nation across the social media platforms refused to defend the email.

But this blunder isn’t a one-off. It reveals a wider and much more obvious fact: China is bad, if not abysmal, at public relations and communications – or “propaganda” as its critics like to call it. 

During a period in which the United States is actively waging a war of words against the country that has had, objectively speaking, significant success, Beijing is failing across the board in the battle for hearts and minds. Not only has it failed to establish a narrative to fight back, but it struggles to foreground the most basic talking points.

China is clearly more competent than many countries in the West in a host of areas, including how to organize a state bureaucracy, competently run an economic system, trade, and manage a pandemic. But this area is not one of them. 

Having worked with the Chinese media myself and seen how it operates behind the scenes, I am honest enough to say it is rigid and therefore ineffective. It is very frustrating to see the advantage the US has over China in this sector – in particular, the inability of state media itself to confront the scale of propaganda and misinformation launched at Beijing every day. A huge overhaul is needed, with even Taiwan getting the better of it when it comes to setting the narrative – despite the fact it is clearly in a far weaker position.

So, what exactly is wrong with Chinese state media? With the exception of the Global Times, which is slightly more effective in getting a message out due to its aggressive posture, it is generally uninspiring, unadventurous, lacking in creativity and does not grasp the fundamental principles of how journalism works, which requires some artistry, as opposed to being about simply reporting things.

It is fair to say that this problem is somewhat rooted in the structural realities of China’s political system itself. In the West, “news” functions as a commercial capitalist commodity by being able to entertain, appeal, shock and scare its audiences, irrespective of the political agendas that might be behind it or of editorial independence or associations.

A biased or disingenuous source of news is not necessarily an ineffective source of news. 

In understanding this, journalists realise the fundamental need for their product to be competitive in the market. In China, however, news exists within the model of a hierarchical party system, and while critics will obviously dismiss it as “state messaging,” with limited independence, the structural problems run deeper than that. 

The Chinese media simply does not have the institutionalized experience that forces outlets to be competitive in a market setting. For example, as much as many people hate the UK tabloid The Sun, it knows its audience very well – what’s never in doubt for me is its ability to know what stories will sell. And if it should ever fail at that, it would go out of business. 

Contrast it with the China Daily, a state-funded newspaper, which doesn’t have to rely on an audience to make money and so operates inefficiently. Chinese media outlets all have enormous budgets, but spend them wastefully.

This leads me on to my next point: no Chinese outlet understands what it means to establish an audience. People consume news because it’s something they need – we want to learn about the world, the weather, the markets, sport, etc. We’re aware that many sources are biased or have a particular agenda, but we choose the outlets that best fit our needs. I’m staunchly critical of the BBC – I can observe its bias and identify when it’s pushing an agenda. But maybe I should ask myself why I keep looking at it so regularly? 

On that note, we might ask, why do people need the Chinese media at all? These outlets offer very strict China-centric messaging, yet try to target overseas audiences. The BBC is popular precisely because it’s not UK-centric, but covers global affairs in depth and detail, and its own agenda is then carefully filtered in. But, in contrast, the Chinese media has little allure for people who don’t closely monitor politics or are interested in other topics. There’s no attempt to make the outlets a go-to source for anything beyond China itself (and even then, the content is often poorly executed). 

Any prominent people outside China who read the Chinese media do so because they’re seeking to study the country or analyse its messaging, or because they strongly oppose it. You tend to get more hatred for writing for CGTN than you do for RT – and there’s rarely a receptive readership to counterbalance that. 

China doesn’t have a normal, everyday, news-reading audience because it doesn’t try to cultivate one. It lacks purpose, which is also partly due to the structural limitations imposed on it. And this is why, when it’s sharing its messages and worldview with a global audience, it’s falling on deaf ears and can’t break through the influence of the mostly Western mainstream media, which continues to dominate and define the perception of China presented to the world.

It should surprise no one that its social media strategy is equally poor. The CGTN Twitter account, for example, professes to have 13.4 million followers, yet the lack of interaction is notable. This is due to the unspoken belief that Chinese media accounts should not try to build organic audiences. Indeed, many outlets have exaggerated their follower counts by bulk-buying fake followers (although Twitter’s “state-affiliated media” labels have not helped them improve their reach, either). The greatest number of interactions CGTN got this week was in response to the appallingly executed email concerning Peng Shuai, which Western journalists attacked with unconcealed relish.

So, when people say China is waging a propaganda war against the West, it should always be remembered how poor and ineffective that actually is. CGTN has a budget of $1 billion, and this was its product.

The US is indisputably waging a vitriolic public-opinion war against China, however. This has included weaponizing an army of think tanks, throwing around allegations of genocide, and coordinating negative news stories to tarnish China’s image in multiple areas, manufacture consent and turn Western public opinion against it. 

---그런데 이것이 언론 맞씁니까??..........언론이 이래 합니까??

이런 언론이 태평양전쟁시절의 쩍팔이 황군놈들 언론과 무슨 차이가 잇지요??

누가 누가 뙤놈들 목을 더 많이 배엇냐......중계방송.

이게 언론이야??

미국의 언론은 서구의 언론은 다를것 같습니까??

야나들의 이런식의 언론에 비하면...노동신문의 수령님 찬양질은 오히려 순수함이 느껴질 지경이고..

그런것이 꼬우면 보지마.....씨봘놈드라...

열씸히 sun이나 뒤젹거리며...딸딸이나 치던지....

Despite China being a highly organised state that has far greater resources and population, the methods it employs to fight back against the US are of a very poor quality, and this has been exposed through the saga of a missing tennis player and an unconvincing attempt to cover up her public absence. 

Peng will eventually reappear, closing down this controversy. It’s the reality of contemporary China that celebrities who don’t toe the line politically are reeled in. However, the handling of this story reveals probably the weakest aspect of the country’s entire system: communications. It’s been too easy for the West to set a narrative against Beijing. China has to understand that journalism is not about simple top-down messaging, but about creativity, enterprise and fulfilling the needs of an audience. Until it does, it will continue to struggle to find its voice against US attacks.(전혀 반대.....중국은 중국의 방식이 잇고....그들의 방식으로 가면 되....왜...중국이 서구와 꼭 같아져야 하지??)