답변입니다.

[이승우]

[답변] 1)에서는 French가 '불어'로서 student와 아주 밀접한 의미관계(=>study French)에 있지만

2)에선는 프랑스인이라는 의미로  student와의 의미관계(=>*study French)가 1)가 1)과는 다르고 서로

밀접한 관계도 아닙니다.

아래 내용을 참고하세요.

 Complements always occur closest to the head N (whether they precede or follow it) than adjuncts occur farther from the head (whether they precede or follow it), and specifiers occur farther from the head(they precede it only).

① 선행관계(Precedence): 보충어가 부가어보다 선행한다.

     a. the student [of physics] [with red hair].

     b. *the student [with red hair] [of physics].

② 중의성(Ambiguity): 보충어와 부가어의 구조적 차이로 설명할 수 있다.

     a. a student [of high moral principles]

     b. a student [of high moral principles] (보충어)

     c. a student [of high moral principles] (부가어)

③ 귀환성(Recursiveness)): 부가어는 선행순서가 바뀔 수 있으나 보충어는 바뀔       수 없다.

     a. the student [with red hair] [with short legs] (부가어)

     b.*the student [of physics] [of chemistry] (보충어)

     c. the student  [with short legs] [with red hair] (부가어)

④ 등위접속(Coordination): 보충어는 보충어끼리 부가어는 부가어끼리 등위 접속     된다.

     a. a student [of physics] and [of chemistry].

     b. a student [with red hair] and [with short legs].

     c.*a student [of Physics] and [with red hair].

     d.*a student [with red hair] and [of Physics].

⑤ 외치(Extraposition): 부가어는 보충어보다 더 자유롭게 외치된다.

     a. A student __  came to see me yesterday [with red hair]. (부가어)

     b.*A student __ came to see me yesterday [of physics]. (보충어)

⑥ 전치(Preposition): 보충어는 부가어보다 더 자유롭게 전치된다.

     a. [What branch of physics] are you a student of?

     b.*[What color of hair] are you a student with?

⑦ 공기(Co-occurrence): 보충어가 부가어보다 더 제약적이다.

     a. a student of physics

     b. *a boy of physics

     c. *a teenager of physics

     d. a student with red hair

     e. a boy with red hair

     f. a teenager with red hair

⑧ 동격절(Appositional clause) 과 관계절(Relative clause): 동격절은 보충어

   이고 관계절은 부가어이다.

     a. the report [that they had defected] [which had been misplaced].

                  ([동격절] [관계절])

     b.*the report [which had been misplaced] [that they had defected].

                  ([관계절] [동격절])

[2006: 서울-인천]

(21～22) Read the passage and follow the directions.

Consider the underlined noun phrases below:

 (1) a. Mr. Smith is a teacher of children.

    .b. Mr. Smith is a teacher from America.

 (2) Mr. Smith is a teacher of children from America.

The noun phrase in (2), which is a combination of (1a) and (1b), is ambiguous. The phrase from America modifies either the head teacher or the head children. Thus, the ambiguity results from the possible modification of either head by the phrase from America.

  However, with the intended meaning ‘Mr. Smith teaches children and he is from America,’ sentence (3) is ungrammatical:

 (3) *Mr. Smith is a teacher from America of children

The notions of complement and adjunct can be used to explain the ungrammatically of (3). A complement is a phrase required by the head while an adjunct is its optional modifier; from America is an adjunct of the head teacher and of children, its complement. The noun phrase in (3) is ungrammatical since it does not satisfy the structural requirement that the

(A)

should come closer to the head than the

(B)

does.

21.Fill in each blank with ONE word from the passage. [2점]

  (A)                      

  (B)                      

22.The underlined verb phrase below is also ambiguous. Identify the modifier and its two modified heads in the underlined part. [3점]

  The student read the book on the stool.

(1) the modifier                                

(2) the modified heads                        

(21) [답안]                                                                                     

(1) complement

(2) adjunct

(22) [답안]                                                                                    

(1) on the stool

(2) read, book