|
Constitutional Institutions that Deceived the People
Destroyed Constitutional Order of the Republic of Korea
The Starting Point and Destination of the Illegal
Impeachment of Our President
The National Report Dissecting the Bare Face of
The Culprit of Illegal Impeachment
Are they our Country's Constitutional Institutions?
Why did the Republic of Korea
Commit Illegal Impeachment?
This book is about the Illegal Impeachment of President Park, GeunHye of the Republic of Korea to protect the constitutional order of the Republic of Korea for truth and the definition of the Impeachment Nullification focusing on the various illegal disposition of the constitutional institutions by notifying the public widely that the illegal impeachment was extremely inappropriate and absurd.
The Patriotic Constitutional Guard
of the Republic of Korea
.
.
Why did the Republic of Korea Commit Illegal Impeachment?
CONTENTS
1. Report on the Illegal Impeachment and Its Nullity to the Public
2. Justice and Truth must NOT be Neglected!
3. Living People's Sovereign Guard in the Republic of Korea's Constitutional Suicide
4. Substantial Sovereignty of the People by the Struggle
5. President Park has never been impeached, removed from office or vacated.
6. Continuation of Illegal Torts for Ruining Country
7. Illegal Tyranny of Prosecutors and Special Prosecutors
4. Substantial Sovereignty of the People by the Struggle
People's sovereignty is the principle that the people have sovereignty, which is the driving force that can determine the supreme affairs of the country, and that the legitimacy of all state power lies with the people. The “People’s Sovereignty Theory” is the most fundamental in modern state management, and it is necessary to establish practical sovereignty of the people and use it as the basic principle of social operation.
“Substantial sovereignty of the people” is the concept corresponding to “formal sovereignty of the people,” which means “the people” only referred to as a tool to use. It rationalizes that the government only has practical form and legal personality to treat the sovereign people as who have no will, cannot make decisions and are merely nominal incompetent scarecrows who cannot execute their will.
In order to materialize formal national sovereignty for achieving the autonomy of the National Assembly in which the people actually participate in the exercise of sovereignty, the real sovereignty and the democracy, we need to fully recognize the concept and essence of the modern representative system.
Is our society really a “substantial sovereignty of the people?”
The principle of constitutionalism based on the theory of national sovereignty is that the content of the basic rights of the people and the exercise of state power should be stipulated in the Constitution and governed accordingly to institutionally guaranteed freedom.
Constitutionalism is that politics should be conducted according to the Constitution established by the consensus of the people. Based on the Constitution established according to the democratic procedure, the state is run with subordinate laws, and the freedom and rights of the people are stipulated.
The Constitution is the supreme law of the state. It can prevent the abuse of state power through the constitutional principle of organizing and exercising power in accordance with the constitution, which provides the basic principles of state management and guarantees the basic rights of the people. It is possible to realize the democratic ideals of dignity, freedom and equality.
It stipulates that “the sovereignty of Korea rests with the people, and all power comes from the people,” and the Constitution of the Republic of Korea stipulates a referendum. Also, it is clear as a solid basis for standing in the position of the theory of substantive popular sovereignty, which does not regard the people as incompetent citizens.
However, as explained above, as a series of illegal acts of the country's representative constitutional institutions, they took the lead in violating the law and deceived the “people as without legal personality” since the illegal impeachment, which has continued from the era of the fake republic of the illegal fake president Moon JaeIn. The Republic of Korea is now in a situation where it cannot be said that it has a constitution, and the constitutionalism governs the country with real Constitution according to the constitution.
In this situation in the Republic of Korea, narrowing the gap between “formal sovereignty of the people” and “substantial sovereignty of the people” would be the way to protect the Constitution of the free and democratic system in which we live.
It is President Park, GeunHye who was illegally impeached, however, the people who elected her as president by voting have the right of the people's sovereignty, monitor whether the actual effect of the vote is consistent with the Constitution and the law as the right of the people's sovereignty. As a citizen who is entitled to the exercise of sovereignty against the inconsistency, it is the very natural and unequivocal right to effectively resist the injustice and illegality.
This modern representative system adopts a modern national representative system, in which individual people have sovereign exercise their sovereignty and actively monitor and participate in national decision-making. It is the expression of practical national representative system and its core content.
As a result of this practical exercise of national sovereignty, the stupid public authorities of this country did not catch the thieves of the illegal and fake president in the country. What and why the police and prosecutors stop We the People when we were to arrest the illegal and fake president? Why the state power interrupted our own right to exercise through the national sovereignty?
Substantial citizen sovereignty is not the role of a simple flag raising on election day, which is merely a formal exercise of national sovereignty.
National sovereignty which will be accepting of the outcome of formal voting, and monitoring and confirming whether it is followed as the legitimate process is the real national sovereignty of We the People today.
The police and prosecutors, who mobilize the police force against protests of We the People who want to arrest the illegal and fake president Moon, and prevent us from doing our own right as citizens, have forgotten or misunderstood their mission and duty. Rather, they are the accomplice with the anti-state forces that are trying to destroy our free country.
The presidential election held on May 9, 2017 was carried out in a continuum of illegal acts committed by the constitutional institutions. It clearly violated the procedural laws, so we could not recognize the illegal and fake president Moon JaeIn as president.
Acknowledging him is in itself a violation of the law and becomes an accomplice in a national rebellion with them. Because of President Park's remaining term of office, the Yun, SeokYeol regime, which succeeded Moon JaeIn's fake republic can't be different.
Although it was an election vote that collected the votes of the people, the votes of the people without the legal cause for holding the election are clearly illegal.
The police and prosecutors of Korea who are sympathetic to the illegal and fake presidents who have infiltrated this country are committing negligence against the law.
Governing from the illegal fake president (a term in criminal law) is no different from the illegal domination of organized gangs. The stupid public authorities in the Republic of Korea need to re-study what is justice and what is illegal and need to come to their senses.
The basic principle of a constitutional rule of law requires that any state action be performed constitutionally and legally within the framework of the Constitution and laws, and the judgment of constitutionality and legitimacy essentially belongs to the power of the judiciary.
However, some state actions are highly political, and it is by no means desirable for a court that does not take political responsibility for such high-level political actions to influence policy decisions by examining the legitimacy while ignoring the purpose or legitimacy of politics. Since there is no denying that the courts are intervening in political issues and infringing on their neutrality and independence, the court itself restrains the exercise of judicial review rights in the case of highly political state actions as so-called acts of government. There are areas that are excluded from the judgment.
Meanwhile, even if the concept of governmental act is recognized in this way, the recognition must be done very carefully so that excessive restraint of judicial review does not result in negligence or abandonment of the court’s responsibility to guarantee basic rights and realize the principle of the rule of law. should be done only by the judiciary. [Supreme Court, March 26, 2004, Sentencing 2003도(Do)7878 judgment]
#Report #Illegal #Impeachment #Nullity #Public #korea #President #seoul #Park-GeunHye #war #constitution #law #publish #book
#litigation #ceo #assembly #anniversary #gratitude #devote #Design #person #legal #nullification #institution #litigation #principle #justice
#struggle #people #commander #democracy #economic #atom #plaintiff # discuss #endless #debate #rights #examin #fight #sports #coronavirus #civil #ngo #emergency #disaster #relief #funds #judgment #accordance #admin #memory #exercise #natural
|