Re: 모든 질병의 시작 'chronic inflammation' - 2019 nature 논문

[문형철]

systemic chronic inflammation은 

1. physical inactivity & obesity 활동부족, 비만

2. dysbiosis 나쁜 장내세균

3. diet - 글루텐(보리, 귀리, 밀), 유당, 설탕

4. chronic stress & disturbed sleep - 만성 스트레스, 수면부족

5. xebobiotics 환경호르몬, 화학물질

6. chronic infections - 만성 감염증이 원인이고

위 문제는 

1. metabolic syndrome - 당뇨, 지방간 등

2. cardiovascular disease - 심혈관 질환

3. cancer - 각종 암

4. depression - 우울증, 조울증 등

5. autoimmune disease - 류마티스 관절염, 루프스, 베체트 병 등 자가면역질환

6. neurodegenerative disease - 알츠하이머 치매, 파킨슨 병, 다발성 경화증 등

7. sarcopenia and osteoporosis - 근감소증, 골다공증

8. immunosencence - 면역세포의 노화와 밀접한 관련이 있음. 

쉽게 말하면 인간의 모든 non-communicable disease는 만성염증과 관련이 있다

Several causes of low-grade systemic chronic inflammation (SCI) and their consequences have been identified. As shown on the left, the most common triggers of SCI (in counter-clockwise direction) include chronic infections, physical inactivity, (visceral) obesity, intestinal dysbiosis, diet, social isolation, psychological stress, disturbed sleep and disrupted circadian rhythm, and exposure to xenobiotics such as air pollutants, hazardous waste products, industrial chemicals and tobacco smoking. As shown on the right, the consequences of SCI (in clockwise direction) include metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cardiovascular disease, cancer, depression, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, sarcopenia, osteoporosis and immunosenescence.

• Perspective
• Published: 05 December 2019

Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span

• David Furman, 
• Judith Campisi, 
• Eric Verdin, 
• Pedro Carrera-Bastos, 
• Sasha Targ, 
• Claudio Franceschi, 
• Luigi Ferrucci, 
• Derek W. Gilroy, 
• Alessio Fasano, 
• Gary W. Miller, 
• Andrew H. Miller, 
• Alberto Mantovani, 
• Cornelia M. Weyand, 
• Nir Barzilai, 
• Jorg J. Goronzy, 
• Thomas A. Rando, 
• Rita B. Effros, 
• Alejandro Lucia, 
• Nicole Kleinstreuer & 
• George M. Slavich 

Nature Medicine volume 25, pages1822–1832 (2019)Cite this article

• 146k Accesses

• 1211 Citations

• 1440 Altmetric

• Metricsdetails

Abstract

Although intermittent increases in inflammation are critical for survival during physical injury and infection, recent research has revealed that certain social, environmental and lifestyle factors can promote systemic chronic inflammation (SCI) that can, in turn, lead to several diseases that collectively represent the leading causes of disability and mortality worldwide, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and autoimmune and neurodegenerative disorders. In the present Perspective we describe the multi-level mechanisms underlying SCI and several risk factors that promote this health-damaging phenotype, including infections, physical inactivity, poor diet, environmental and industrial toxicants and psychological stress. Furthermore, we suggest potential strategies for advancing the early diagnosis, prevention and treatment of SCI.

Main

One of the most important medical discoveries of the past two decades has been that the immune system and inflammatory processes are involved in not just a few select disorders, but a wide variety of mental and physical health problems that dominate present-day morbidity and mortality worldwide1,2,3,4. Indeed, chronic inflammatory diseases have been recognized as the most significant cause of death in the world today, with more than 50% of all deaths being attributable to inflammation-related diseases such as ischemic heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and autoimmune and neurodegenerative conditions5. Evidence is emerging that the risk of developing chronic inflammation can be traced back to early development, and its effects are now known to persist throughout the life span to affect adulthood health and risk of mortality6,7,8. In this Perspective, we describe these effects and outline some promising avenues for future research and intervention.

Inflammation

Inflammation is an evolutionarily conserved process characterized by the activation of immune and non-immune cells that protect the host from bacteria, viruses, toxins and infections by eliminating pathogens and promoting tissue repair and recovery2,9. Depending on the degree and extent of the inflammatory response, including whether it is systemic or local, metabolic and neuroendocrine changes can occur to conserve metabolic energy and allocate more nutrients to the activated immune system9,10,11,12. Specific biobehavioral effects of inflammation thus include a constellation of energy-saving behaviors commonly known as “sickness behaviors,” such as sadness, anhedonia, fatigue, reduced libido and food intake, altered sleep and social-behavioral withdrawal, as well as increased blood pressure, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia10,13.These behavioral changes can be critical for survival during times of physical injury and microbial threat14.

A normal inflammatory response is characterized by the temporally restricted upregulation of inflammatory activity that occurs when a threat is present and that resolves once the threat has passed9,13,15. However, the presence of certain social, psychological, environmental and biological factors has been linked to the prevention of resolution of acute inflammation and, in turn, the promotion of a state of low-grade, non-infective (that is, ‘sterile’) systemic chronic inflammation (SCI) that is characterized by the activation of immune components that are often distinct from those engaged during an acute immune response13,16.

Shifts in the inflammatory response from short- to long-lived can cause a breakdown of immune tolerance9,15 and lead to major alterations in all tissues and organs, as well as normal cellular physiology, which can increase the risk for various non-communicable diseases in both young and older individuals1,9,10,11,15,17,18,19,20,21. SCI can also impair normal immune function, leading to increased susceptibility to infections and tumors and a poor response to vaccines22,23,24,25. Furthermore, SCI during pregnancy and childhood can have serious developmental consequences that include elevating the risk of non-communicable diseases over the life span7,8,26,27.

Systemic chronic inflammation and non-communicable disease risk

Although they share some common mechanisms, the acute inflammatory response differs from SCI (Table 1). Most notably, the acute inflammatory response is typically initiated during times of infection via an interaction between pattern recognition receptors expressed on innate immune cells and evolutionarily conserved structures on pathogens, called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). The acute inflammatory response can also be activated by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that are released in response to physical, chemical or metabolic noxious stimuli—that is, ‘sterile’ agents—during cellular stress or damage2. Following infection, production of molecules such as lipoxins, resolvins, maresins and protectins then contribute to the resolution of inflammation28,29.

Table 1 Acute inflammation versus systemic chronic inflammation

Full size table

In contrast, SCI is typically triggered by DAMPs in the absence of an acute infectious insult or activation of PAMPs30,31,32. SCI often increases with age30, as indicated by studies showing that older individuals have higher circulating levels of cytokines, chemokines and acute phase proteins, as well as greater expression‎ of genes involved in inflammation1,19,30. Moreover, SCI is low-grade and persistent (as the name suggests) and ultimately causes collateral damage to tissues and organs over time, such as by inducing oxidative stress1,4,9,19.

The clinical consequences of SCI-driven damage can be severe and include increased risk of the metabolic syndrome, which includes the triad of hypertension, hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia33,34; type 2 diabetes33; NAFLD33,35; hypertension1; cardiovascular disease (CVD)18,19; chronic kidney disease19; various types of cancer17; depression21; neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases4,12,20; osteoporosis11,36 and sarcopenia19 (Fig. 1). Empirical evidence that inflammation plays a role in disease onset or progression is strongest for metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and CVD. Indeed, it has long been known that patients with autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis that are characterized by systemic inflammation have insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and hypertension, and that they have higher rates of metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and CVD (particularly ischemic heart disease and stroke)10,12,37,38,39. Moreover, the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) is a predictor of cardiovascular events in men and women40. In a recent meta-analysis of data from more than 160,000 people across 54 long-term prospective studies, higher levels of circulating CRP were associated with a relative increase in risk for both coronary heart disease and CVD mortality41.

Fig. 1: Causes and consequences of low-grade systemic chronic inflammation.

Several causes of low-grade systemic chronic inflammation (SCI) and their consequences have been identified. As shown on the left, the most common triggers of SCI (in counter-clockwise direction) include chronic infections, physical inactivity, (visceral) obesity, intestinal dysbiosis, diet, social isolation, psychological stress, disturbed sleep and disrupted circadian rhythm, and exposure to xenobiotics such as air pollutants, hazardous waste products, industrial chemicals and tobacco smoking. As shown on the right, the consequences of SCI (in clockwise direction) include metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cardiovascular disease, cancer, depression, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, sarcopenia, osteoporosis and immunosenescence.

Full size image

The most compelling evidence for an association between SCI and disease risk comes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have tested drugs or biologics that target specific pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. In a recent meta-analysis of eight RCTs that included a total of 260 participants, anti-TNF-α inhibitor therapy was found to significantly reduce insulin resistance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and to improve their insulin sensitivity42. The risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease was also significantly lower among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with the TNF-α inhibitor etanercept43. In addition, a recent double-blind RCT of the IL-1β inhibitor canakinumab that assessed more than 10,000 adults with a history of myocardial infarction and elevated circulating CRP levels showed that patients treated with canakinumab subcutaneously every 3 months had lower rates of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and CVD death compared with those treated with a placebo, despite having no change in LDL cholesterol, which is a risk factor for CVD. In this trial, canakinumab-treated patients also exhibited a lower likelihood of unstable angina leading to urgent revascularization44.

Along similar lines, a recent study of more than 160,000 people from North Glasgow found that a combination of the inflammatory markers CRP (>10 mg/L; HR 2.71, P < 0.001), albumin (>35 mg/L; HR 3.68, P < 0.001) and neutrophil count (HR 2.18, P < 0.001) predicted all-cause mortality over 8 years, in addition to mortality due to cancer, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease45.

Biomarkers for systemic chronic inflammation

Despite evidence linking SCI with disease risk and mortality45, there are presently no standard biomarkers for indicating the presence of health-damaging chronic inflammation. Studies have shown that canonical biomarkers of acute inflammation predict morbidity and mortality in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies and may thus be used to index age-related SCI46. This approach has notable limitations, though. For example, early work by Roubenoff and colleagues showed that in monocytes from ambulatory individuals, levels of IL-6 and IL-1Ra (but not IL-1β or TNF-α) increased with age47. However, no difference in IL-1 and IL-6 expression‎ has been found between young and older individuals when the health status of older individuals is strictly controlled48,49.

Additionally, a recent study examined levels of 18 endogenous and ex vivo-stimulated inflammatory markers in 41 healthy volunteers of different ages across the life span. Results revealed that unstimulated levels of IL-12p70 in women and CRP in men were associated with older age, whereas no effects were found for IL-1β, IFN-α or TNF-α50. Therefore, evidence exists that greater inflammatory activity is associated with older age, but this is not true of all inflammatory markers, and it is possible that these associations are due at least in part to increases in chronic ailments and frailty that are frequently associated with age rather than to biological aging itself.

To address limitations associated with assessing only a few select inflammatory biomarkers, some researchers have employed a multi-dimensional approach that involves assaying large numbers of inflammatory markers and then combining these markers into more robust indices representing heightened inflammatory activity. In one such study, researchers used principal component analysis to identify pro- and anti-inflammatory markers and an innate immune response that significantly predicted risk for multiple chronic diseases (CVD, kidney disease and diabetes), in addition to mortality51.

More recently, a multi-omics approach has been applied to examine links between SCI and disease risk. The researchers followed 135 adults longitudinally and conducted deep molecular profiling of participants’ whole-blood gene expression‎, termed the transcriptome; immune proteins—for example, cytokines and chemokines—termed the immunome; and cell subset frequencies, such as CD8+ T cell subsets, monocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, B cells and CD4+ T cell subsets. This enabled the researchers to construct a high-dimensional trajectory of immune aging (IMM-AGE) that described individuals’ immune functioning better than their chronological age. This new metric in turn accurately predicted all-cause mortality, establishing its potential future use for identifying at-risk patients in clinical settings52. These types of integrative, multi-level approaches to characterizing SCI are promising, but this work is still in its infancy and much more research is needed to identify best practices for selecting and analyzing SCI-related biomarkers in order to yield the most useful and predictive information for quantifying age-related disease risk.

Sources of systemic chronic inflammation

The SCI state in older individuals is thought to be caused in part by a complex process called cellular senescence, which is characterized by an arrest of cell proliferation and the development of a multifaceted senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)53. A prominent feature of this phenotype is increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and other pro-inflammatory molecules from cells53. Senescent cells expressing this phenotype can in turn promote a multitude of chronic health conditions and diseases, including insulin resistance, CVD, pulmonary arterial hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, emphysema, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, macular degeneration, osteoarthritis and cancer54,55.

How senescent cells acquire the SASP is not fully understood, but existing research points to a combination of both endogenous and non-endogenous social, environmental and lifestyle risk factors. Among the known endogenous causes of this phenotype are DNA damage, dysfunctional telomeres, epigenomic disruption, mitogenic signals and oxidative stress56. The non-endogenous contributors are thought to include chronic infections57, lifestyle-induced obesity58, microbiome dysbiosis59, diet60, social and cultural changes61,62 and environmental and industrial toxicants63. The fact that differences exist in the extent to which older adults exhibit SCI52,64 is thought to be indicative of inter-individual differences in exposure to these and other related pro-inflammatory factors, although studies documenting within-person associations between these risk factors and SCI are limited.

Nevertheless, differences in non-communicable diseases associated with SCI are evident across cultures and countries. Most prominently, SCI-related disease rates have increased dramatically for both older and younger individuals living in industrialized countries who follow a Western lifestyle but are relatively rare among individuals in non-Westernized populations who adhere to diets, lifestyles and ecological niches that more closely resemble those present during most of human evolution65,66,67,68,69,70,71. Furthermore, dietary and lifestyle habits, as well as exposure to a variety of different pollutants, can increase oxidative stress, upregulate mitogenic signaling pathways and cause genomic and epigenomic perturbations8,60,62,63 that can induce the SASP. Further evidence for a role of lifestyle in the development of chronic inflammation comes from a study of 210 healthy twins between 8 and 82 years old, which found that non-heritable factors are the strongest contributors to differences in chronic inflammation across individuals72 and that exposure to environmental factors, which have been collectively called the exposome, are the main drivers of SCI. Simply put, the exposome refers to a person’s lifelong exposure to physical, chemical and biological elements, starting from the prenatal period onward73.

Chronic infections

The effect of lifelong infections caused by cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, hepatitis C virus and other infectious agents on SCI and immune dysregulation remains controversial74,75,76,77,78. In terms of aging, chronic infection with cytomegalovirus has been associated with the so-called immune risk phenotype that has been predictive of early mortality in several longitudinal studies79. Furthermore, chronic infection with HIV causes premature aging of the immune system and is associated with early cardiovascular and skeletal changes57, with such effects being attributed in large part to the accumulation of senescent CD8+ T cells that produce increased levels of pro-inflammatory mediators80.

Although several studies have reported associations between chronic infections and autoimmune diseases, certain cancers, neurodegenerative diseases and CVD, chronic infections appear to interact synergistically with environmental and genetic factors to influence these health outcomes76,77,81. Indeed, humans coevolved with a variety of viruses, bacteria and other microbes82, and while chronic infections appear to contribute to SCI, they are not likely the primary driver. For instance, populations of hunter-gatherers and other existing non-industrialized societies such as the Shuar hunter-gatherers of the Ecuadorian Amazon83,84, Tsimané forager-horticulturalists of Bolivia68, Hadza hunter-gatherers from Tanzania67, subsistence agriculturalists from rural Ghana85 and traditional horticulturalists of Kitava (Papua New Guinea)86—all of whom are minimally exposed to industrialized environments but highly exposed to a variety of microbes—exhibit very low rates of inflammation-related chronic disease and substantial fluctuations in inflammatory markers that do not increase with age65,67,68,83,86.

Lifestyle, social and physical environment

Individuals in the populations mentioned above have relatively short life expectancies on average, which means that some die before showing signs of advanced aging. However, the relative absence of SCI-related health problems in these populations has not been attributed to genetics or to having a shorter life expectancy, but rather to lifestyle factors and the social and physical environments the people inhabit66. Their lifestyles, for example, are characterized by higher levels of physical activity67,71,87, diets composed mainly of fresh or minimally processed food sources66,88,89, and less exposure to environmental pollutants66. In addition, individuals living in these environments generally have circadian rhythms that are more closely synchronized with diurnal fluctuations in sunlight exposure90 and the social stressors they experience are different from those typically present in industrialized environments91.

These social and environmental characteristics are believed to have predominated during most of hominin evolutionary history until industrialization66,82,89. Industrialization conferred many benefits, including social stability; reduced physical trauma; access to modern medical technology; and improved public health measures, such as sanitation, quarantine policies and vaccination, all of which significantly decrease infant mortality rates and increase average life expectancy66. However, more recently, these changes also caused radical shifts in diet and lifestyle, resulting in living circumstances that are very different from the ones that shaped human physiology for most of evolution. This is believed to have created an evolutionary mismatch in humans—characterized by an increasing separation from their ecological niche—and this mismatch, in turn, has been hypothesized to be a major cause of SCI65,66,82,89,92.

Physical activity

Industrialization is thought to have caused a significant overall decrease in physical activity. One study showed that, worldwide, 31% of individuals are considered physically inactive—defined as not meeting the minimum international recommendations for regular physical activity—with levels of inactivity being higher in high-income countries than in low-to-middle-income countries93. In the United States, these numbers are even higher, with approximately 50% of American adults being considered physically inactive94.

Skeletal muscle is an endocrine organ that produces and releases cytokines and other small proteins, called myokines, into the bloodstream. This occurs particularly during muscle contraction and can have the effect of systemically reducing inflammation95. Low physical activity, therefore, has been found to be directly related to increased anabolic resistance96 and levels of CRP and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in healthy individuals97, as well as in breast cancer survivors98 and patients with type 2 diabetes99. These effects can, in turn, promote several inflammation-related pathophysiologic alterations, including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, high blood pressure and loss of muscle mass (sarcopenia)100, that have been found to increase risk for a variety of conditions, including CVD, type 2 diabetes, NAFLD, osteoporosis, various types of cancer, depression, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, in individuals who are chronically inactive95,100.

Consistent with these effects, there is strong evidence for an association between physical inactivity and increased risk for age-related diseases and mortality. A recent meta-analysis of studies with cohorts from Europe, the United States and the rest of the world that included 1,683,693 participants found that going from physically inactive to achieving the recommended 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week was associated with lower risk of CVD mortality by 23%, CVD incidence by 17%, and type 2 diabetes incidence by 26% during an average follow-up period of 12.8 years101. Moreover, data from 1.44 million participants across several prospective cohort studies revealed that, as compared to individuals exhibiting high levels of leisure-time physical activity (≥90th percentile), those who were physically inactive (≤10th percentile) had a greater risk (>20%) of developing several cancers, including esophageal adenocarcinoma; liver, lung, kidney, gastric cardia and endometrial cancers; and myeloid leukemia, even after adjusting for multiple major risk factors such as adiposity and smoking status (except for lung cancer)102. Likewise, a meta-analysis of ten studies and 23,345 older adults (70 to 80 years old) who were followed for 3.9–31 years found that individuals meeting the minimum international physical activity recommendations had a 40% lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease as compared to their physically inactive counterparts103.

Finally, physical inactivity can increase individuals’ risk for various non-communicable diseases because it is linked to obesity100 and, in particular, excessive visceral adipose tissue (VAT), which is a significant trigger of inflammation104,105,106. VAT is an active endocrine, immunological and metabolic organ composed of various cells (including immune cells, such as resident macrophages) that expands mostly through adipocyte hypertrophy, which can lead to areas of hypoxia and even cell death, resulting in activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, increased production of reactive oxygen species, and release of DAMPs (for example, cell-free DNA). These events can induce the secretion of numerous pro-inflammatory molecules, including adipokines, cytokines (for example, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α), and chemokines (especially monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) by adipocytes, endothelial cells and resident adipose tissue immune cells (for example, macrophages)105,106,107,108. This in turn leads to the infiltration of various immune cells in the VAT, including monocytes, neutrophils, dendritic cells, B cells, T cells and NK lymphocytes, and a reduction in T regulatory cells, thereby amplifying inflammation, which can eventually become prolonged and systemic in some individuals106,107,108,109.

Furthermore, TNF-α and other molecules can cause adipocyte insulin resistance, which increases lipolysis, with the resulting spillover of lipids into other organs, such as the pancreas and liver, where they can contribute to beta-cell dysfunction, hepatic insulin resistance and fatty liver106. Hence, visceral obesity accelerates aging and increases risk for cardiometabolic, neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases, as well as several types of cancer19,104,106,110,111,112. These dynamics are known to occur in adults and can promote age-related disease risk, but they first emerge during childhood26. The childhood obesity epidemic might thus be playing a key role in promoting inflammation and age-related disease risk worldwide113.

Microbiome dysbiosis

Obesity may also lead to SCI through gut microbiome-mediated mechanisms114. For example, studies conducted in moderately obese Danish individuals without diabetes115 and in severely obese French women116 found changes in gut microbiota composition and microbial gene richness that were correlated with increased fat mass, pro-inflammatory biomarkers and insulin resistance. Furthermore, in older adults, changes in the gut microbiota seem to influence the outcome of multiple inflammatory pathways59.

Obesity, which is strongly linked to changes in the gut microbiome, has also been associated with increased intestinal paracellular permeability and endotoxemia114,117. Moreover, the latter is a suspected cause of inflammation through activation of pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors, in immune cells and of inflammation-mediated metabolic conditions such as insulin resistance118. Interestingly, serum concentrations of zonulin, a protein that increases intestinal permeability, appear to be elevated in obese children and adults117,119, and in persons with type 2 diabetes118, NAFLD, coronary heart disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, autoimmune diseases and cancer117. More recently, elevated serum zonulin concentrations have been found to predict inflammation and physical frailty120.

More broadly, it has been hypothesized that a complex balance exists in the intestinal ecosystem that, if disrupted, can compromise its function and integrity and in turn cause low-grade SCI59. It may thus be important to identify possible triggers of dysbiosis and intestinal hyperpermeability, which could potentially include the overuse of antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and proton-pump inhibitors121,122; lack of microbial exposure induced by excessive hygiene and reduced contact with animals and natural soils, which is a very recent phenomenon in human evolutionary history82,123; and diet123 (see below).

Diet

The typical diet that has become widely adopted in many countries over the past 40 years is relatively low in fruits, vegetables and other fiber- and prebiotic-rich foods66,123,124,125 and high in refined grains124, alcohol126 and ultra-processed foods125, particularly those containing emulsifiers127. These dietary factors can alter the gut microbiota composition and function123,127,128,129,130 and are linked to increased intestinal permeability129,130,131 and epigenetic changes in the immune system129 that ultimately cause low-grade endotoxemia and SCI129,130,131. The influence of diet on inflammation is not confined to these effects, though. For example, orally absorbed advanced glycation and lipoxidation end-products that are formed during the processing of foods or when foods are cooked at high temperatures and in low-humidity conditions are appetite increasing and are linked to overnutrition and hence obesity and inflammation132. Furthermore, high-glycemic-load foods, such as isolated sugars and refined grains, which are common ingredients in most ultra-processed foods, can cause increased oxidative stress that activates inflammatory genes133.

Other dietary components that are thought to influence inflammation include trans fatty acids134 and dietary salt. For example, salt has been shown to skew macrophages toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype characterized by the increased differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into T helper (TH)-17 cells, which are highly inflammatory, and decreased expression‎ and anti-inflammatory activity of T regulatory cells135. In addition, high salt intake can cause adverse changes in gut microbiota composition, as exemplified by the reduced Lactobacillus population observed in animals and humans fed high-salt diets135. This specific population is critical for health as it regulates TH17 cells and enhances the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier, thus reducing systemic inflammation135. Consistent with the expected health-damaging effects of consuming foods that are high in trans fats and salt, a recent cohort study of 44,551 French adults who were followed for a median of 7.1 years found that a 10% increase in the proportion of ultra-processed food consumption was associated with a 14% greater risk of all-cause mortality136.

Several other nutritional factors can also promote inflammation and potentially contribute to the development of SCI. These factors include deficiencies in micronutrients, including zinc137 and magnesium138, which are caused by eating processed or refined foods that are low in vitamins and minerals, and having suboptimal omega-3 levels139, which impacts the resolution phase of inflammation. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids—especially eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid—modulate the expression‎ of genes involved in metabolism and inflammation139. More importantly, they are precursors to molecules such as resolvins, maresins and protectins that are involved in the resolution of inflammation28,29. The main contributors to the growing worldwide incidence of low omega-3 status are a low intake of fish and high intake of vegetable oils that are high in linoleic acid, which displaces omega-3 fatty acids in cell membrane phospholipids140,141. In turn, various RCTs have shown that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduces inflammation142,143,144 and may thus have health-promoting effects141,142,143,144.

Evidence linking diet and mortality is robust. For example, an analysis of nationally representative health surveys and disease-specific mortality statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics in the United States showed that the dietary risk factors associated with the greatest mortality among American adults in 2005 were high dietary trans fatty acids, low dietary omega-3 fatty acids, and high dietary salt145. In addition, a recent systematic analysis of dietary data from 195 different countries identified poor diet as the main risk factor for death in 2017, with excessive sodium intake being responsible for more than half of diet-related deaths146.

Finally, when combined with low physical activity, consuming hyperpalatable processed foods that are high in fat, sugar, salt and flavor additives147 can cause major changes in cell metabolism and lead to the increased production (and defective disposal) of dysfunctional organelles such as mitochondria, as well as to misplaced, misfolded and oxidized endogenous molecules30,60,148. These altered molecules, which increase with age19,30, can be recognized as DAMPs by innate immune cells, which in turn activate the inflammasome machinery, amplify the inflammatory response1,30,60 and contribute to a biological state that has been called “inflammaging,” defined as the “the long-term result of the chronic physiological stimulation of the innate immune system” that occurs in later life30. As proposed, inflammaging involves changes in numerous organ systems, such as the brain, gut, liver, kidney, adipose tissue and muscle19, and it is driven by a variety of molecular-age-related mechanisms that have been called the “Seven Pillars of Aging”55—namely, adaptation to stress, epigenetics, inflammation, macromolecular damage, metabolism, proteostasis and stem cells and regeneration.

Social and cultural changes

In addition to physical inactivity and diet, the industrial revolution and modern era have ushered in changes in social interactions and sleep quality59,91 that can promote SCI149,150 and insulin resistance151, in turn increasing risk for obesity, type 2 diabetes, CVD and all-cause mortality150,151,152,153,154. Moreover, psychological stressors that are persistently present in some contemporary work environments, such as those characterized by high job demand and low control, can cause physiologic changes155 that disrupt the ability for glucocorticoids to effectively down-regulate inflammatory activity due to decreased sensitivity caused by chronic elevation in cortisol, leading in turn to SCI and poor health156.

Another core feature of modern society that has occurred very recently in human evolutionary history is increased exposure to artificial light, especially the blue spectrum, at atypical biologic times157,158,159. Exposure to blue light, especially after sundown, increases arousal and alertness at night and thus causes circadian rhythm disruption158,159, which in turn promotes inflammation160, and is a risk for multiple inflammation-related diseases157,159. As an example, night-shift work has been found to increase risk for the metabolic syndrome and is suspected of being a causal factor in obesity, type 2 diabetes and CVD, as well as in breast, ovarian, prostate, colorectal and pancreatic cancer157.

Environmental and industrial toxicants

The rapid rise in urbanization over the past 200 years8 brought with it an unprecedented increase in humans’ exposure to various xenobiotics, including air pollutants, hazardous waste products and industrial chemicals that promote SCI8,161. Each year, an estimated 2,000 new chemicals are introduced into items that individuals use or ingest daily, including foods, personal care products, prescription drugs, household cleaners and lawn care products (see https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov). The concomitant increase in the estimated contribution of environmental chemicals to human disease burden162 has prompted a shift toward data generation using high-throughput screening to investigate the effect of industrial toxicants on cellular pathways, which has been supported by initiatives like the US Federal Tox21 Program, and toward the adoption of translational systems-toxicology approaches for integrating diverse data streams to better understand how chemicals affect human health and disease outcomes163. The Tox21 Program has tested more than 9,000 chemicals using more than 1,600 assays and has demonstrated that numerous chemicals to which people are commonly exposed greatly alter molecular signaling pathways that underlie inflammation and inflammation-related disease risk164. These chemicals include phthalates, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, bisphenols, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and flame retardants165.

These compounds and others promote inflammatory activity via multiple mechanisms. For example, they can be cytotoxic8,162, cause oxidative stress or act as endocrine disruptors, starting in utero8. These chemicals are thus suspected of playing a causal role in hormone-dependent cancers, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, CVD, allergy and asthma, and autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases8,162,166. Tobacco smoking, which remains a worldwide health problem, is yet another source of xenobiotics that has been associated with a variety of inflammation-related diseases167.

Developmental origins of systemic chronic inflammation

The origins of SCI can also be viewed from a developmental perspective. For example, it is well established that childhood circumstances significantly impact metabolic and immune responses later in life, which in turn promote SCI in adulthood8,26,27,168,169. Childhood obesity, for instance, is strongly associated with major changes in adipose tissue and metabolic dysfunction that cause metabolism-related-SCI, or so-called metainflammation26. Because obese children often become obese adolescents and adults26, the risk of developing a pro-inflammatory phenotype also frequently persists into adulthood among individuals who were obese as children.

Another example of SCI being influenced by early life circumstances comes from epidemiologic studies showing that greater microbial exposure in infancy is associated with reduced risk of chronic inflammation in adulthood8,168, as predicted by the hygiene, or ‘old friends’, hypothesis82. Additionally, there is evidence that exposure to psychological stress early in life—for example, in the form of abuse, neglect, maltreatment, bullying or living in a low socioeconomic environment—can heighten neural responses to threat that can upregulate inflammatory activity170, alter immunocompetence and lead to SCI throughout the lifecycle27,169.

Further back in the developmental trajectory are data showing that the immune system is programmed during the prenatal period171 and is affected by epigenetic changes induced by maternal environmental exposures (for example, infectious agents, diet, psychological stress and xenobiotics) during intrauterine life and even before conception, when paternal factors may also have an epigenetic effect26,128,171. Together, these effects create the potential for the intergenerational transmission of risk for SCI. In this model (Fig. 2), SCI and disease risk are hypothesized to be perpetuated transgenerationally. In short, maternal inflammation during pregnancy172,173 is believed to pass an inflammatory ‘code’ through epigenetic modifications to the offspring, who will exhibit elevated risk for SCI in childhood and adulthood and therefore be more likely to suffer from a wide variety of inflammation-related health problems, including obesity7, CVD7, cancer174 and neurological illness175, among others, only to again pass this risk on to their own offspring.

Fig. 2: The maternal exposome and low-grade systemic chronic inflammation.

Maternal lifestyle and environmental exposures—collectively referred to as the exposome—include diet, physical activity, psychological stress and exposure to various xenobiotics, such as pollutants and smoking during intrauterine life. These factors in turn can influence the programming of the immune system of the offspring, potentially leading to a more pro-inflammatory phenotype later in life. Relevant factors, including environmental factors such as poor access to healthy food, housing insecurity, psychological stress and polluted air, lead to a mother giving birth to a fetus with epigenetic marks that increase the child’s risk for obesity, low-grade SCI and its associated consequences in adolescence and adulthood.

Full size image

Chronic inflammation and the immune response to acute challenges

Despite the observation that SCI generally increases with age, a majority of older adults experience a down-regulation of components of the immune response that leads to an increased susceptibility to viral infections and weakened responses to vaccines. This apparent paradox (Fig. 3) can be explained by several mechanisms.

Fig. 3: Inflammatory model of immunosenescence and chronic disease.

This proposed model associates elevated baseline phosphorylated signaling proteins (for example, phosphorylated STAT (pSTAT) levels) with cellular unresponsiveness and chronically elevated inflammatory activity. The model involves an elevation of baseline pSTAT levels and its association with hallmark phenomenon of immunosenescence, an increased pro-inflammatory environment, unresponsive cells and a clinical impact on immune response. (Adapted with permission from ref. 22, Elsevier.)

Full size image

Specifically, elevated SCI can lead to a basal low-grade constitutive activation of various signaling pathways, such as the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK–STAT) system in leukocytes, which results in a weakened acute response to multiple stimuli in immune cells from older adults with chronic inflammation due to reduced fold-increase in the levels of phosphorylation of these proteins after cell stimulation22. Elevated SCI has also been shown to predict hyporesponsiveness to the hepatitis B vaccine in humans24. Additionally, there is evidence that certain inflammatory biomarkers, such as CRP, are inversely correlated with older adults’ response to other vaccines, such as the herpes zoster vaccine23. Interestingly, this also seems to be true for younger individuals. Among adolescents, for example, those who respond well to typhoid vaccination have been found to exhibit lower concentrations of CRP than non-responders in adulthood25. In sum, this research helps to explain the pro-inflammatory/antiviral skewing that occurs as individuals age. This work also suggests that exposure to an inflammatory environment early in life is an important determinant of multiple aspects of an individual’s immuno-phenotype in adulthood.

Future directions

Considered together, this body of research provides converging evidence that SCI is associated with increased risk for developing a variety of chronic diseases that dominate present-day morbidity and mortality worldwide and that cause enormous amounts of human suffering. At the same time, there are several key avenues that could be pursued to help strengthen this work and translate this research into effective strategies for improving human health.

First, there is a clear need for additional studies that collect data on multiple factors affecting SCI to form a more comprehensive picture of how exposures and experiences identified at different levels of analysis combine to affect SCI and inflammation-related disease risk. Second, the field sorely needs robust integrative biomarkers of SCI that go beyond combining a few canonical biomarkers of acute inflammation. Existing biomarkers, which have primarily included CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α, have been useful for demonstrating that inflammatory activity is related to disease and mortality risk, but these markers provide only limited mechanistic information (given the enormous complexity of the inflammatory response) and they do not address anti-inflammatory regulatory pathways that may also be relevant for influencing inflammation-related disease risk. Future research should thus focus on additional biomarkers that have been found to have substantial variability across individuals, such as CD8+ T cell subsets, monocytes, NK cells, B cells and CD4+ T cell subsets176. This work should also include molecular, transcriptional and proteomic markers of SCI, which have only been examined in limited ways to date177. Constructing biomarkers that integrate information from a variety of different data sources and levels of analysis to represent inflammatory activity and immune regulation and dysregulation would be particularly useful, as would applying multi-omics approaches, computational modeling and artificial intelligence to study how SCI-related mechanisms both change and predict changes in clinical status within individuals over the life span178.

Third, given the difficulty associated with experimentally manipulating factors such as diet, sleep and stress levels that affect inflammation, a majority of studies conducted thus far have collected inflammatory biomarker data under basal conditions in which the immune system is not challenged. This is a sensible starting place, but such research does not provide any information regarding biological reactivity or recovery (for example, from infection or psychological or physiological stress), which may ultimately be most useful for understanding individual differences in inflammation-related disease risk3,179. Finally, although many of the SCI-promoting factors that we have described herein are at least partly modifiable—including physical inactivity, poor diet, nighttime blue light exposure, tobacco smoking, environmental and industrial toxicants exposure and psychological stress—the number of studies that have successfully targeted these risk factors and shown corresponding reductions in SCI levels is limited. This has occurred despite the fact that the association between inflammation and chronic disease is now widely recognized and that healthcare systems are buckling due to the enormous cost of treating a worldwide population that is heavily burdened by SCI-related chronic health problems. Therefore, the time to start seriously studying how to prevent and treat SCI-related disease risk in both children and adults is now.

In conclusion, we have a long way to go before we fully understand the role that SCI plays in disease risk, biological aging and mortality. For example, no study to date has assessed the entire human exposome over the entire developmental trajectory, starting in utero (for example, by measuring maternal exposures, type of delivery and early-life nutrition) and continuing into adulthood (for example, by assessing social and cultural processes, xenobiotic exposures, individual lifestyle habits, lifelong antibiotic use, vaccinations, infectious diseases and social-psychological stressors). Moreover, only a few studies have investigated how modifying SCI-related processes may benefit human health or longevity. As a result, although SCI is a highly modifiable process in principle, additional research, initiative and investment are needed before we fully realize the potential benefits associated with targeting inflammation to improve human health.

References

1. Furman, D. et al. Expression‎ of specific inflammasome gene modules stratifies older individuals into two extreme clinical and immunological states. Nat. Med. 23, 174–184 (2017).

   Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

2. Netea, M. G. et al. A guiding map for inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 18, 826–831 (2017).

   Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

3. Slavich, G. M. Understanding inflammation, its regulation, and relevance for health: a top scientific and public priority. Brain Behav. Immun. 45, 13–14 (2015).

   Article PubMed Google Scholar 

4. Bennett, J. M., Reeves, G., Billman, G. E. & Sturmberg, J. P. Inflammation–nature’s way to efficiently respond to all types of challenges: implications for understanding and managing “the epidemic” of chronic diseases. Front. Med. 5, 316 (2018).

   Article Google Scholar 

5. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392, 1736–1788 (2018).

   Article Google Scholar 

6. Miller, G. E., Chen, E. & Parker, K. J. Psychological stress in childhood and susceptibility to the chronic diseases of aging: moving toward a model of behavioral and biological mechanisms. Psychol. Bull. 137, 959–997 (2011).

   Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

7. Fleming, T. P. et al. Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences. Lancet 391, 1842–1852 (2018).

   Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

8. Renz, H. et al. An exposome perspective: early-life events and immune development in a changing world. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 140, 24–40 (2017).

   Article PubMed Google Scholar 

9. Kotas, M. E. & Medzhitov, R. Homeostasis, inflammation, and disease susceptibility. Cell 160, 816–827 (2015).

   Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

10. Straub, R. H., Cutolo, M., Buttgereit, F. & Pongratz, G. Energy regulation and neuroendocrine-immune control in chronic inflammatory diseases. J. Intern. Med. 267, 543–560 (2010).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 

11. Straub, R. H., Cutolo, M. & Pacifici, R. Evolutionary medicine and bone loss in chronic inflammatory diseases—a theory of inflammation-related osteopenia. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 45, 220–228 (2015).

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

12. Straub, R. H. & Schradin, C. Chronic inflammatory systemic diseases: an evolutionary trade-off between acutely beneficial but chronically harmful programs. Evol. Med. Public Health 2016, 37–51 (2016).

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

13. Straub, R. H. The brain and immune system prompt energy shortage in chronic inflammation and ageing. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 13, 743–751 (2017).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 

14. Slavich, G. M. Psychoneuroimmunology of stress and mental health. in The Oxford Handbook of Stress and Mental Health (eds K. Harkness & E. P. Hayden) (Oxford University Press, in the press).

15. Fullerton, J. N. & Gilroy, D. W. Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 551–567 (2016).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 

16. Calder, P. C. et al. A consideration of biomarkers to be used for eval‎uation of inflammation in human nutritional studies. Br. J. Nutr. 109, S1–S34 (2013).

    Article PubMed Google Scholar 

17. Taniguchi, K. & Karin, M. NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: coming of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 309–324 (2018).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 

18. Gisterå, A. & Hansson, G. K. The immunology of atherosclerosis. Nat Rev. Nephrol. 13, 368–380 (2017).

    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar 

19. Ferrucci, L. & Fabbri, E. Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 15, 505–522 (2018).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

20. Heneka, M. T., Kummer, M. P. & Latz, E. Innate immune activation in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 463–477 (2014).

    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar 

21. Miller, A. H. & Raison, C. L. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 22–34 (2016).

    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar 

[타이밍]

저에게 꼭 필요했던 자료네요 잘 읽었습니다

[문형철]

실제 난치병이라고 하는 많은 질환.. 류마티스 관절염, 루프스, 심지어 치매, 파킨슨까지도 치료는 여기서 출발합니다. 놀라운 치유효과가 있어요 ㅎㅎㅎ