이거 해석해주시면 토익교재 무료로 드릴께요

제가 아래 문장들을 어느정도는 해석할 수 있겠는데, 정확하게 의미를 해석하지를 못하겠어요 ㅠ.ㅠ 상식 수준의 경제학 문제를 영어로 써 놓은 건데, 몇 문장은 해석 할 수 있겠는데, 전체적으로 정말 해석을 목하겠어요. 이틀동안 꾸역꾸역대다가 이렇게 카페에 글 올리게 되었어요. ㅠ.ㅠ 부디 해석 좀 부탁드릴께요..;; 제가 꼭 반드시 사례하겠습니다. 부디 좀 부탁드릴께요 (토마토, 적토마, 김대균 기출1000제, 열린 토익) <a href="http://go.daum.net/bin/go.cgi?relative=1&url=/Mail-bin/login_f.cgi%3Ferror%3Dlogin%26lu%3D/Mail-bin/send_mail.form.cgi%3FTO%3Dss5714@hanmail.net">ss5714@hanmail.net</a> 제 이메일 주소예요;; 제 0 문제 1. Among the millions of decisions that you need to make for next year are how many compact discs to produce, what artists to record, and who should receive the discs. a. How would your decisions about CDs affect some of your other decisions, such as how many CD players to make or cassette tapes to produce? How might some of your other decisions about the economy change your views about CDs? 제 1 문제 An Economist article states : "In the past decade, most of the rich world's fisheries have been exploited to the point of near exhaustion" Included in the article is the following analysis. a. "Do not blame fishermen for overfishing. They are behaving rationally, as they have always done." In what sense is "overfishing" rational for fishermen. b. "A community, held together by ties of obligation and mutual self-interest, can manage a common resource on its own." Explain how such management can work in principle and what obstacles it faces in the real world. c. "Until 1976 most world fish stocks were open to all comers, making conservation almost impossible. then an international agreement extended some aspects of [national] jurisdiction from 12 to 200 miles offshore." Using the concept of property rights, discuss how this agreement reduces the scope of the problem. d. The article notes that many governments come to the aid of suffering fishermen in ways that encourage increased fishing. How do such policies encourage a vicious cycle of overfishing? e. "Only when fishermen believe they are assured a long-term and exclusive right to a fishery are they likely to manage it in the same far-sighted way as good farmers manage their land." Defend this statement. f. What other policies to reduce overfishing might be considered ? 단어 * community 공동사회, 지역사회 , overfish 물고기를 남획하다, 다 잡아버리다 scope 범위, 영역 , fishermen어부 , obstacles 장애(물) , exploite 개척하다, 개발하다 jurisdiction사법권,관할권 제 2문제 Many parts of California experienced a severe drought in the late 1980s and early 1990s. a. Draw a diagram of the water market to show the effects of the drought on the equilibrium price and quantity of water. b. Many communities did not allow the price of water to change, however. What is the effect of this policy on the water market? Show on your diagram any surplus or shortage that arises. c. A 1991 op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal stated that "all Los Angeles resdents are required to cut their water usage by 10 percent as of March 1 and another 5 percent starting May 1, based on their 1986 consumption level." The author criticized this policy on the grounds of both efficiency and equity, saying "not only does such a policy reward families who ' wasted ' more water back in 1986, it does little to encourage consumers who could make more drastic reductions, [and].... punishes consumers who cannot so readily reduce their water use." In what way is the Los Angeles system for allocating water inefficient? In what way does the system seen unfair? d. Suppose instead that Los Angeles allowed the price of water to increase untul the quantity supplied. Would the resulting allocation of water be more efficient? In your view, would it be fairer or less fair than the proportionate reductions in water use mentioned in the newspaper article? What could be done to make the market solution fairer? *단어 equilibrium 편형상태, 균형 , unfair불공평한, proportionate비례하는, usage관습, diagram 도표, 도식, 그림, severe 가혹한 문제 3번 A subsidy is the opposite of a tax on the buyers of ice-cream cones, the government collects $0.50 for each cone purchased ; with a $0.50 subsidy for the buyers of ice-cream cones, the government pays buyers $0.50 for each cone purchased. a. Show the effect of a $0.50 per cones subsidy on the demand curve for ice-cream cones, the effective price received by sellers, and the quantity of cones sold. b. Do consumers gain or lose from this policy? Do producers gain or lose? Does the government gain or lose? *subsidy 보조금, 장려금 , curve 곡선 , opposite 반대쪽의, purchase 구입하다