Over the past few decades, movies and TV problems have evolved into different genres. Most movies and TV programs end in audiences' preferences and expectations or not. These endings affect differently to different people depending on how characters are treated in their backgrounds. Although it could be advantageous for the audience for all movies and TV programs to show those good people are rewarded and bad people are punished, I do not agree that all movies and TV programs should end that way as it poses false hope and degrades the Flim industry.
If all movies and TV shows end with stories giving rewards to good people and punishments to bad people, it puts false hope in the audience. However, their input is just as important because when watching a movie or any TV show, audiences usually fall into the perspective of the main character and get affected by the movie's stories. Usually, the main characters are protagonists who end up putting a positive impact to people. After their positive actions, they're normally rewarded in different forms such as recognition, money, love, and happiness. Because movies and TV shows' audiences start at an early age, it is important to let them know that good works are always paid with an award, which can even just be an emotional reward in their hearts. Furthermore, showing that antagonists get punished could put a reputation that being a menace to people or society is a sinful action. Through this, it could encourage not only the children but other watchers to be a protagonist and put a positive impact, rather than negatively impact the people of the society. However, some may say that because of these impacts, it is beneficial to pose them in all movies and TV shows. Nevertheless, when all stories end that way, it could impose false hope on people who do good works and expect awards all the time. Because of their high reliance on the stories from the movies or TV shows, it is even more important to show the reality that life is not always as expected and good forms of action should be from the motivated to help people not for awards. For instance, in the movie Les Misérable, a character named Fantine, works in a factory after her abandonment by the child's father. She ends up there to support her only young daughter, Cosette. This shows she is a protagonist who works hard to show However, at that time, it was even worse to be a single mother with no official marriage. This caused other females to kick her out of the factory, and led her into wandering around France to find the money. Her beauty attracted many evil people to take away her possessions, hair, teeth, body, and health in exchange for little money. This in return affected deeply with her body's health and later dies in the arm of Jean Valjean. Unfortunately, she does not get to meet her daughter, but Jean Valjean promises to be like a father to Cosette. Although the evil people didn't get any punishments and Fantine received death, it rather showed the realistic side of 19th-century society. This reveals the
Next, when all movies and TV shows end in that ending, it could worsen the film industry. Their stories would become more predictable and expected, which is the worst critique a movie or TV show could get. Films' purpose is to entertain the audience; however, if all storylines end similarly, there will be no original stories that could engage the audience. However, some may that if stories are different, with just similar endings, there wouldn't be a problem in creating diversity in the film industry. Nevertheless, there are other ways to make the same effect as giving rewards to good people and punishments to bad people such as focusing on the people who got affected by the impact of the good people's actions and the bad people's actions. This would stimulate the morality of their belief and encourage them to not result in the same effect as the good or bad people did. For example, in the movie Avengers: The End Game, Iron Man, Tony Stark passed away after defeating Thanos, the one who vanished half of the population in the world. Although the hero wasn't given with any rewards audiences usually expect, his impact on the world was shown. He was able to bring back all the families together, who were once separated due to Thanos' "snap". This showed a side of reality where protagonists could eventually risk their own lives for the benefit of the society, and not for the rewards. Furthermore, even though it was a fictional movie, many audiences grieved with his death and was inspired for his actions. This proves that only providing an expected end story for all movies just downgrade the flim industry for their predictable ending. There are many other ways to bestow the same effect of encouraging positive impacts to the audiences rather than good people eventually getting a reward and bad people getting punished.
첫댓글 수고했다,,,홧팅,,,