Question: 10
In my view, the government should prioritize dispersing the population density of metropolitan areas by providing relevant benefits to local cities. Despite the common perception that affordable housing is hard to come by, plenty of housing options are available in rural or remote towns at lower prices. The actual challenge, therefore, ought to be how to allure the demands for housing densely focused on metropolitan areas to move to those local regions, in other words, decentralization. First, the government has to incentivize companies to settle in local areas by providing tax cuts. The abundance of employment opportunity keeps people in heavily populated cities, which means it’s hard to get a job in rural areas. If companies create new quality jobs in those regions, individuals may be motivated to leave metropolitan areas, henceforth getting more affordable housing options. Second, advanced infrastructures of such highly populated cities also invite people to decide to stay in, confining their residential housing options within it. For example, if an individual is with their kids, they may prioritize opting for regions where school or library are featured. However, it's an indisputable fact that populated cities a lot superior to local cities in essential functions such as public transportation, public facilites, public education, or healthcare delivery systems. The government, thus, should invest in constructing more public amenities in relatively less populated regions, levelling off the disparity between the metropolitan areas and rural ones. A shortage of affordable housing isn’t solely derived from a single cause like the ceaseless increment of the population, but it is rather due to more complicated interdependences. To address this pending issue, the government should approach it with multiple-layered perspectives.
첫댓글 수고했다 승준,,,홧팅,,,