Question: 13
Score: 5
I believe that students had better stay in a classroom. Comparing the time, money, and energy to be spent by both of options, studying at school seems to outweigh the benefits of going on a field trip. A field trip takes so much of time, money, energy that it deteriorates its efficiency. For example, if you go on a field trip to a paleontology museum, you may enjoy the experience itself you have in the first place sfpending the whole afternoon time, but actually you can learn all of them just by glancing at a textbook at least twice sitting on a chair in the classroom. One the contrary, you can study the very same content not spending the whole afternoon time, walking around the big hole of a museum or gallery, bringing a cumbersome lunch box, if your time is spent learning in the classroom. So, I think students had better stay at school.
In an essay style( still in process)
The decision of going on field trips or staying in a classroom should be settled down with a variety of considerations. Both have distingtive strengthes, and the value of them can vary depending on such situational contexts as where the school is located; how old the students are; or whether the teachers are proficient enough to manage to conduct field trips successfully with educational purposes. Considering all these aspects, I believe that students had better stay in a classroom in most cases. Some adherents of educational trips may say embarking on them can provoke educational curiosity and foster independent learning habits among students. However, the costs of them are quite sizable, and moreover, their benefits don’t seem to outweigh their counterpart, which only requires much less resources, significantly.
First, regarding time efficiency, staying in a classroom outweighs undertaking a field trip. An educational trip typically takes a day or two to learn a simple conception. However, staying in a classroom only consumes an hour to study the very same thing. which means students can get the most out of their time when they are at school, not other places like a museum, gallery, or historical sites. Meticulous and thorough preperations of teachers are also prerequisite to educational trips, compelling teachers to spend significant amount of extra time to ensure no preventable accidents would occor during them.
Second, when studying at school, the only neccessatiy students need to bring with themselves is a textbook, whereas field trips coerce students and teachers to make extra expenses to prepare a bunch of items like a backpack, a lunch box, or enterance fees.
Lastly, thanks to the advance of technology, experiential learning, the distinctive quaility of field studies is no longer their exclusive and unique property. Experiencing in person can accelerate learning process, which is one of the reasons why field trips have been prevailing. However, due to the internet, computers and other internet devices can do as much justice of the content students learn as field trips do. The internet has allowed students to study with visual and auditory contents as like they really go on a field trip.
Question: 14
Score: 4
I believe resent graduates should start their career with older comanies with well-known reputation. Start-up companies often come with an innovative workplace environment, providing diverse opportunities because they usually have flexible employee management practices. Contrarily, older businesses tend to adhere to conventional practicies passed on from previous generations and can be strick concerning reorganization of positions. Many people, thus, consider working in a new start-up company desirable from the perspective that they offer more opportunities to experience and deal with a diversity of business affairs. However, we can't neglect the fact that new businesses often lack of money, which menas you are going to get less paid. Therefore, my vantage view here is to start your career with an older company with established reputation. They will provide stable salary, and your career would be more reinforced. When you earn enough money, turnover to a new start-up company to experience innovative company.
Revised: I believe recent graduates should initiate their careers with well-established companies known for their reputable history. Start-up firms often boast innovative work environments, offering diverse opportunities due to their flexible employee management practices. On the contrary, older businesses may adhere to conventional practices passed down through generations and can be rigid regarding position restructuring. Many individuals find working for a new start-up appealing because it provides varied experiences in dealing with a range of business affairs. However, it is essential to acknowledge that new businesses often face financial constraints, resulting in lower salaries. In my perspective, the optimal approach is to commence your career with a well-established company that provides stability in terms of salary and career development. Once you have accumulated sufficient experience and financial stability, consider transitioning to a new start-up company to embrace an innovative work culture.
첫댓글 수고했다,,,홧팅,,,