토플 라이팅 테스트 4-1 통합형
In the lecture, the lecturer strongly argues that the benefits of congestion pricing are not trustful for some people. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that congestion pricing will be beneficial and positive.
First, the speaker maintains that it makes safe-related problems more dangerous, not safer. Even though the overall number of accidents is decreased, the occurring accidents are much more severe. Also, there is a report that the risk of serious injury or death were doubled when it is implemented in Australia. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s argument that it makes that area safer.
Second, the professor insists on the fact that it makes public transportations less convenient. This is because it might seem great at first, but more and more people will use them as time flies and this overcrowded and overuse of them will cause lack of transportations and inconvenience. In other words, the congestion pricing policy will worsen people’s life quality. This rebuts the reading passage’s insistence that public transportations and management of time for people will be efficient due to congestion pricing.
The last, the lecturer believes that this policy can harm the business industry in a city. Since the number of people who resident in suburban areas or areas other than that city is reduced, so the revenue or income of the business and sales of the city is going down too. This refutes the reading passage’s assertion that this policy will enable business companies work effectively. What the lecturer emphasizes is that congestion pricing will affect negative effects to the area.
첫댓글 수고했다,,,홧팅,,,