-대통령 하나 바뀐다 하여 세상이 바뀌는 것이 아니다....라는 말이 유행하기도 햇지요
이는 노무현교 쥐쇗끼들이 노무현에 씨워진 실퍠의 독박을 벋어나기 위해 만든 말입니다.
대통령 하나가 나라을 어떻게 망가트릴 수 잇는가....를 알고 싶거던 지금의 우크라인을 보고 잇쓰면 된다고 햇지요??
나라 하나 정도 망가트리는데는 대통령 하나로도 충분합니다..
그런데 나라를 바로 세우기 위해서는 정말 대통령 하나로는 절대 불 가능한 것을 쉽게 알수 잇습니다.
저 말은 좀더 섬세하게 바뀔야 하지 않을까??
대통령 하나가 나라를 망쪼들게 할 수 는 잇지만
대통령 하나로 나라를 바로 세울수는 없다.......................라고..
물론 노무현이 나라를 바로 세우려 햇던 대통령이엇다 고는 ......눈꼽 만큼도 생각하지 않습니다.
노무현은 나라를 망쳣쓰면 망쳣지 세운 인물이라고는 도무지 할 수 없고
드글 드글 하게 번식한 노무현교 쥐쇄끼때들이 그 증거입니다..
Would anything change for the destiny of TITANIC if they've would change the captain???
(선장을 바꾼다 하여 타이타닉의 운명을 바꿀 수 잇엇을까??)
아래글을 읽으면서 당장에 갖게 되는 생각은
-땀이 성공을 보장 하던 시절은 이미 오래전에 끝낫다....는 한 미 경제학자의 한탄입니다..
그 경제학자는 중국을 보라고 햇습니다.
최소 중국 정도의 윤리와 정의가 보장 되지 않는다면 누가 힘들여 노력하여 돈을 벌려고 하겟느냐?? 고 햇습니다.
중국이 여러분이 생각하고 잇는 것 과는 매우 다르게.....매우 경쟁적인 사회라는 소립니다..
사회는 유동합니다.......칼 막스는 모든것이 다 녹아 내린다고 햇지요.
중국이 앞으로 얼마만큼이나 더 이런 기조를 유지 할 수 잇을지 알 수 없지만
최소 지금까지의 중국의 발전은 ..그들의 참 대단한 노력과 노력에 따른 보상 때문이엇다는 것이지요.
아랫글에서 조 바이든으로 상징되는 미국의 모습은....누가 뭐라해도 딱 한국의 모습입니다.
미안 하지만...미국에서 현재 우리가 배울것이 잇다면....저리하면 망 하는 구나....는 반면 교사 입니다.
미국이 하는 것의 반대가 우리의 미래와 진리요 생명이다는 것인데..
미국에만 쩌러 잇는 빠가들의 꼬라가지는 꼼짝없이 한말 망국의 유학자들의 모습이라...
Would anything change for the US and the world if Biden wasn’t president?
The US president’s career could have ended before it started, but the system that produced him would have found another reprobate
By Tony Cox, a US journalist who has written or edited for Bloomberg and several major daily newspapers.
© BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP
It’s sometimes interesting to play “what if,” especially with pivotal moments that didn’t seem so meaningful at the time. For instance, what if Adolf Hitler had become a successful artist? More recently – and more to the point – what if Joe Biden had been expelled from law school when he got caught plagiarizing a writing assignment?
The decision by Syracuse University in 1965 to let Biden, then 22, repeat the course, rather than be kicked out of school, didn’t appear to be consequential at the time. As one of the worst students (ranking No. 76 out of 85) at a mediocre law school, Biden probably seemed like someone of little consequence, a guy who might be chasing ambulances or doing estate planning for elderly clients back in his home state of Delaware – if he managed to graduate and pass the bar exam.
After all, Joseph Robinette Biden never seemed like the sort of shining star who might be pegged for future greatness or influence. The stuttering son of a used-car salesman, Biden has never displayed the attributes of a dynamic and virtuous leader. No one could honestly claim that he rose to power because of inspiring ideas, great political skills, or impeccable character.
Getting caught cheating in law school was just a harbinger of many scandals and embarrassments to come for the future president of the United States, the “leader of the free world.” But just as he got away unscathed at Syracuse – preventing what would have been the destruction of his career even before it began – Biden escaped accountability time after time over the course of his half-century in politics.
When he got caught plagiarizing the speeches of other politicians during his first campaign for president, in 1987, he became a media laughingstock and had to quit the race. However, he was a longshot candidate anyway, and he somehow managed to continue getting elected as a US senator from Delaware in the decades that followed. He also ran unsuccessfully for president in 2008 before serving two terms as vice president under President Barack Obama, and finally winning the top job in 2020.
None of that would have happened if he had been expelled from law school. It’s anybody’s guess as to what Biden might have wound up doing instead of politics – he certainly had the chutzpah to follow in his father’s footsteps selling used cars – but he’s never had to pay the price for his wrongdoing.
Somehow, no amount of lying, plagiarizing, racist gaffes, or corruption allegations was able to thwart Biden’s rise to power. When he was accused of sexually assaulting a Senate intern on Capitol Hill, the #MeToo movement suddenly went mute. Likewise, in an age when sexual harassment is a career-killer for many Americans, Biden has been politically unscathed by his handsy tendencies.
Even as he campaigned for president from his basement in 2020, anyone with an internet connection could watch clips of him groping or sniffing women and little girls at public events when he was vice president. Last year, two Florida residents were convicted of trying to sell the diary of Biden’s daughter, Ashley Biden, who had left her journal behind at a rental property. The diary reportedly contained a passage about taking showers with her father at a young age, saying they were “probably not appropriate” and contributed to her promiscuity as she got older.
Legacy media outlets came to Joe Biden’s rescue by ignoring the content of the diary and focusing on the supposed villains who allegedly tried to exploit it. This resembles the time when another Biden child, son Hunter Biden, left his laptop at a Delaware repair shop – revealing possible evidence of selling his father’s political influence. Back then, the media similarly ran interference, touting false claims by former US intelligence officials that the revelations had the hallmarks of “Russian disinformation.” With the November 2020 election just three weeks away, social media platforms helped, too, by censoring the New York Post’s bombshell report on the laptop.
Ironically, Biden campaigned on vows to “restore the soul of America” and “bring back decency” to the White House. He did so while continuing his habit of telling lies, in some cases to make himself the hero or sympathetic figure of every tale. For example, he falsely claimed that he was arrested in apartheid South Africa while on his way to visit Nelson Mandela, and he repeated lies he had been telling since at least the 1980s about working as a civil rights activist when he was a teenager. He has repeatedly falsely claimed that his son Beau Biden died in the Iraq War, and he invented a story about going into a “firestorm” in Afghanistan to pin a medal on a reluctant hero.
Many of Biden’s lies are absurd and inconsequential, as if he’s telling them for sport, like when he claimed that he had worked as a truck driver, or the one about coming from a family of coal miners, or the one about being “raised in a black church.” Others bear more serious consequences, like when he claimed during a 2020 debate that President Donald Trump was spreading Russian disinformation by mentioning the laptop scandal. He cited the letter signed by former intelligence officials to prove that the laptop was a “Russian plant,” and yet he knew it to be legitimate. It later came to light that his campaign allegedly helped orchestrate the phony letter to help kill the bombshell report.
Rather than being political liabilities, Biden’s dishonesty and thick-facedness might be among the traits that got him pegged as a potential figurehead for the power brokers who get US candidates elected. He can look a skeptic in the face, tell him the opposite of the truth, and shame him for daring to ask a pointed question. There’s an infamous clip of Biden doing just that to a voter in 1987, when he bragged about his intelligence by telling multiple lies about his academic record. He insulted the man by saying, “I’d be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you’d like.”
That level of unflinching confidence and condescension while lying is perhaps one of Biden’s biggest selling points for the ruling elite. In their system, a US president has to be able to pontificate about the sanctity of an ally’s sovereignty while carrying on with a nearly decade-long illegal occupation of Syria’s oil fields and meddling in the affairs of other countries all over the world. He has to preach self-determination when it suits the Western neocon agenda, while denying the same privilege when the people in a given location don’t want what Washington prefers.
When the military industrial complex is salivating over a good opportunity for a proxy war in, say, Ukraine, the commander-in-chief must be able to justify funding the bloodshed by touting the need to defend “freedom and democracy” – in a place that has neither freedom nor democracy. That’s also a place where the US helped overthrow the democratically elected government and disenfranchise or kill large swaths of the population. And domestically, an American president must pretend to represent the law-abiding working class while importing millions of illegal aliens to suppress wages and re-engineer the country’s demographics.
Any leader who even threatens to deviate from the program will be politically neutered at least, or killed at most. As Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer warned in 2017, after Trump suggested that US spying agencies were trying to build a false case about Russian hacking, “You take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.” In other words, subvert the interests of the citizenry, or else.
Biden’s lack of any moral conviction also comes in handy. There seems to be no issue on which he’s unwilling to flip-flop if the political winds shift, or if his masters set a new course. He can shamelessly alter the past like an Orwellian Big Brother talking about how Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
For example, during a 2020 presidential primary debate, Biden forcefully claimed to have been an outspoken opponent of America’s illegal war in Iraq, when in fact he had been a leading proponent and praised then-President George W. Bush’s “bold” leadership on the issue. He’s the same politician who eulogized the late Senator Robert Byrd, a former “Exalted Cyclops” of the KKK, in 2010, then claimed in 2020 that he was running for president because he was so outraged by a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.
So, looking at Biden through the prism of his utility for the people who buy politicians, it’s not surprising that he rose to the top. Just two years after winning his first post in local government, he became one of the youngest Americans ever elected to the US Senate. He was later nicknamed “The Senator From MBNA,” referring to the Delaware bank that helped fund his campaigns for decades and gave Hunter Biden a no-show consulting job. Perhaps not coincidentally, Joe Biden was a leading proponent of a key bill that the banking industry wanted, making it tougher for consumers to get protection from their credit card debts in bankruptcy.
Some of Biden’s defenders try to deflect criticism of his character by pointing to the flaws of his political adversaries, especially Trump. Sadly, this is the standard reaction to damning truths in today’s American politics. It’s not false to say the other team’s leader is guilty of something – having skeletons in the closet appears to be a prerequisite for reaching high office in the US – but this approach means that no one is ever held accountable by their supporters.
바이든의 옹호자들 중 일부는 그의 정적들, 특히 트럼프의 결점을 지적함으로써 바이든 자신의 성격에 대한 비판을 피하려고 한다. 슬프게도, 이런 빌어처 먹을 사실은 오늘날의 미국 정치에서 표준적인 반응입니다. 정치적 적들의 리더가 뭔가 죄를 지었다고 말하는 것은 틀린 말이 아다.--옷장속에 해골을 감추고 잇다는 것은 미국 고위직에 오르기 위한 필수 조건인 것처럼 보이지만--이런 접근법은 지지자들에게 아무도 책임을 지지 않는다는 의미다.
--딱 한국의 정치인들이나 정당들의 행태 아닙니까??
특히 노무현교 쥐쇗끼때들은 ...항상 자신들의 오류와 이에 따른 비판을 ...쟈들은??...쟈들은 우리 보다 더 햇다??...는 식으로 비껴 갓습니다..
--난 남의 남자 죶만 빨앗지만 저 년는 죶 구멍을 대 줫다...누가 더 개 차반이냐???....궁궁궁..
이런것은 한때는 민주화 세력, 진보 세력 이라는 자들에게...민주당의 도덕적 양심적 우월을 완전히 망가지게 햇고
화낭년, 갈보간 멀체쌈질로 처 밀어넣어 꼭 같은 개 차반 평준화를 만들엇습니다...
못 한놈이 빙싄 이라는 철쩌한 냉소를 만들어 -이게 뭐야~~~ 라는 견딜 수 없는 자괴감으로 사람들이 떠나게 햇지만
그들이 떠난 그 텅빈 자리를 ....처 먹은 뇌물이 뽀록자나 억울하게 돌아가셧다는 갱상도 교주 노무현의 망녕으로만 체웟지요.
이들의 이런 눈물나는 교주님 할렐루야를 가능하게 한것은
저놈들은 우리들 보다 더 하다는 상대적인 우월감 때문입니다..
-우리교주가 640만불을 받아 처 먹엇다면 니들은 얼마를 받아 처 먹엇나??..
-우리 모두 공평하게 털어 보자 ....으잉!!
이런 -못 한놈이 뷩신이다는 정신질환이 해골 깊숙히 자리 해서 독사 쇗끼들 처럼 또아리를 틀어 정착해 버린 것이지요.
모든 잘못의 외부화 ......
이는 비단 미국이나 미국의 개 한국만의 이야기도 아니고
자유 민주주의 치하를 견디고 더 나아가 출세 하고 생존할 수 잇는 최선의 수단입니다.
Arguing that the other party’s leaders are evil doesn’t make your party’s leaders any less vile.(노무현교 쥐쇗끼때들, 민주당, 진보 세력들은 이런 간단한 것도 이해 하지 못 하는 그야 말로 빠가들의 결정체입니다...그들은 저들과 눈꼽만큼도 다리지 않지만 자신들은 다르다는 대단한 망상에 쩌러 사는 미친개들이지요) It does make it easier for the kingmakers to impose on the people whatever they want – even an octogenarian who is so cognitively degraded that he can’t speak coherently or make his way off stage without getting lost or falling down.
That’s why even though it might be fun to fantasize about what might have been if Biden was held accountable for cheating at Syracuse or somewhere else along the way, it probably wouldn’t have made much difference. Removing one particularly odious politician from the picture doesn’t mean the voters would have been given a more honorable option. In today’s Washington, virtue isn’t on the menu, and the citizens aren’t willing or able to demand something better.((어쩜 이리도 우리들의 처지를 쪽 집게 처럼 찝어 낼 수 잇을까??......윤성열을 이재명으로 바꿧다 하여 무엇이 달라졋을까요??....
본 훼퍼는 힛틀러 치하의 나찌즘을 빈정거리며 말 햇습니다.
-낭떨어지로 치 달리는 기관차의 맨 뒷칸으로 이동한다 하여 무슨 차이가 잇느냐??..
우리는 어쩜 파시즘보다 더 지독하고 비열한 민주주의라는 낭떨어지를 향해 치 달리는 기관차에 탑승한 공동의 운명체라는 생각을 갖게 되는 것이 과장일까요??
-모든 시대는 그 시대의 파시즘을 갖고 잇다.............프리모 네비
-21세기의 파시즘은 민주주의다 ..................알렝 바데우