모처럼 좋은 소식 하나...

[다른소리]

https://news.v.daum.net/v/20210828192443752

덴마크 "코로나19, 더는 사회에 중대 위협 아냐"..내달 제한해제

다른소리1분전

부럽네...

우리도 하루라도 빨리 그리 되길 바랍니당ㅇㅇㅇㅇ

패 나눠....죽자 살자 피박나게 싸우는 꼴 보기 싫어서라도.....저 날이 빨리  왓쓰면 좋겟습니다.

-코로나가 감기다....코로나로 퍄쇼정치 하고 잇다...고....악악거리는 년놈들 꼴 보기 싫어서 라도

빨리 그날이 왓쓰면 좋겟고..

그 날이 오면...광화문에서 축제 한판 벌리자고,,,,,,,,,수구 꼴통, 노무현교 꼴통들만 빼고..

코로나 피로감은 당연합니다..

10년 병에 효자 없다는 말도 잇지요..

한 두달도 아니고 2년씩이나 계속되고 잇으니....긴장감도 집중력도 각오도 흩트러 지는 것은 당연한 것입니다.

코로나가 처음 시작 햇을때 을 상기합시다..

그때 어떤 잘난놈들은-경제에 환장한 년놈들- 코로나 cvp분석을 햇습니다....

생명을 자본주의의 상품 처럼 생각 한 것입니다..

다른소린 이런 병리적인 사고 자체가 문제라고 맹렬하게 비판 햇습니다.

생명은 상품이 아닙니다..

아래글은 보리스 존슨 영국 총리가 코로나 cvp 분석을 햇다는 글입니다..

함 죽 읽어 보기시 바랍니다....

그리고 이런 분석의 대상이 된 기분이 얼마나 죶 같은 것인지..

사람의 생명을 생산비용으로 본 다는 것이지요......

자본주의 체체에서는 당연한 것입니다..그리고 실제 그러고 잇지요

하지만 결코 인정하고 싶지 않는 사고와 셈법입니다..

사람 나고 돈 낫지,  돈 나고 사람난 것 아닙니다....물론 현실은 엄연히 반대 이지만

호마 싸피언스로 결코 포기하고 싶지 않는 명제이지요.

코로나 초기에 이런식의 발상 자체에 대한  분노를 참지 못 햇습니다.

코로나 피로감 어짜고 하는 것은...이런 계산을 다시 하겟다는 것입니다.

그것 대를 위해 소는 되지라는  개 소립니다..

젊고 건강한 사람들을 위해 병약자와 늙은이는 되지라는 발상이지요..

코로나 초창기 스웨덴의 집단면역을 비판 하면서...

바이킹문화에는 늙은이들이 병들고 쓸모 없게 되면 스스로 절벽에서 떨어저 죽어 주는 전통이 잇엇음을 이야기 햇습니다.

한국에서도 고려장이 잇엇지요..

21세기 대명 천지에서....이런짓 하면 않 됩니다... 

정치에서만 멀어져도....코로나 대체에 대한 훨씬 더 이성적이고 합리적인 생각을 할 수 잇을 것입니다.

항상 문제는 정치입니다...

정치가 곧 저주 입니다...

UK government: 50,000 annual COVID-19 deaths are “acceptable”

Chris Marsden

•  

Britain’s i newspaper has revealed that Prime Minister Boris Johnson has conducted “a cost-benefit analysis” to determine whether “saving lives” through further lockdowns can be justified based on the “effect of deaths on the UK economy.”

Two government advisors told the i that closed-door discussion had established an “acceptable level of Covid-19 deaths” at around 1,000 deaths a week.

Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson pauses during a coronavirus briefing in Downing Street, in London, Monday April 5, 2021. (Stefan Rousseau/Pool via AP)

According to one adviser, Johnson had privately accepted that there would be at least a further 30,000 deaths in the UK over the next year, and that he would “only consider imposing further [COVID-19 safety] restrictions if that figure looked like it could rise above 50,000.”

Johnson, who has the social conscience of a Heinrich Himmler, put the acceptable cost of saving the life of a COVID-19 patient at £30,000. However, this proposed upper limit for treating a patient was then combined with a calculation of “how much each life lost costs the UK economy.”

According to the two sources, “the analysis shows that the cost of keeping the annual death rate below 50,000 would outweigh the cost to the UK economy of allowing it to rise above this level.” This translates to “deaths from Covid of 137 a day, or just under 1,000 a week.”

---사람의 생명을 이런식으로 계산 하는 발상 자체가....빌어 처 먹을 일입니다..

그런데 자본주의는 이런 발상을 강제 합니다...이런 생각을 하지 못 하는 사람들을 찌지리라고 합니다..

필자는 영국 총리의 이런 발상을 히물러에 비교 하엿습니다..

-대을 위해 소는 되져라..

-건강한 사람을 위해 병약한 사람은 되저라

-경제를 위해 생명은 되져라.................라는 나찌즘에 비교 한 것입니다.

Professor Graham Medley, chair of the Government’s pandemic modelling group Spi-m and member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), told the i by way of justification, “Measures such as vaccinating children against meningitis or imposing speed limits on roads reduce death and disease, but also cost money and limit freedoms.”

The i ’s sources stressed that “it won’t be an immediate reaction” and that only a “sustained rate of death of around a 1,000 a week for two or three weeks” would “lead to discussion on restrictions being reimposed.” Not even a “discussion” on lockdowns will take place. The proposed trigger for such a possible reconsideration was meant solely to legitimise the ending of lockdown and the removal of all measures of mitigation on July 19. It was never intended to be implemented.

Sympathising with Johnson’s supposed dilemma, the i ’s source states, “Unfortunately, prime ministers have to weigh up the cost of saving lives to the impact on the economy. No one wants to talk about that’s how it works.”

But Johnson has previously made clear exactly “how it works.” His embittered former adviser Dominic Cummings revealed WhatsApp messages sent by Johnson to his advisers last October, declaring of COVID fatalities, “The median age is 82–81 for men 85 for women… There are max 3m [million] in this country aged over 80. It shows we don’t go for nationwide lockdown.”

Events have moved on since these criminal calculations were made. Based on data over the past seven days in the UK, deaths from COVID-19 have already reached just under 800 a week or 110 every day. For three of those days the death toll exceeded the 137 figure. By next week, the death toll will almost certainly exceed 1,000 over seven days, an annual equivalent exceeding 50,000.

A month from now, predictions of 50,000 deaths a year will look wildly optimistic.

Next week will see all primary and secondary schools reopen in England and Wales, a super-spreader event of massive proportions. Since schools reopened in Scotland from August 16, daily cases have risen from 1,567 to 6,835, well over 300 percent. In the past week alone, they have risen by 114 percent.

Yesterday, the modelling group of SAGE warned that ministers must plan for a huge rise in COVID-19 cases as schools return “by the end of September 2021.”

That is why the government’s response to the leaks to the i newspaper was to state, “There is no set number of acceptable deaths from Covid.” This was not to deny the 50,000 figure being cited, but to make clear that no number of deaths will prompt a change in the government’s murderous policy of letting the virus rip through the population.

The citing of costs versus benefits is merely an alternative version of Trump’s insistence that “the cure must not be worse than the disease.” What “cost benefit analysis” means in the discussion on the pandemic is that working people will pay with their lives and health to preserve capitalist profitability.

cvp 분석의 인용은 ‘치료가 질병보다 더 나빠서는 안 된다’는 트럼프의 주장에 대한 대안적 표현일 뿐입니다. ‘비용 편익 분석’이 코로나에 대한 논의에서 의미하는 바는, 자본가들의 수익성을 보존하기 위해 노동자들의 생명과 건강을  지불해야한다는 것입니다.

이런 발상 자체가 빌어처먹을 발상입니다..

사람의 생명을 두고 이런식으로 말 할 수는 없는 것이지요..

스웨덴이 집단면역으로 접근 햇을때, 맹령한 비판가들은 코로나를 이용하여 불필요하고 비용만 들어가는 노인층을 쓸어 버리려는 시도 라고....까지 비난햇습니다.

자본주의가 사람들을 어떻게 까지 바꿔 놓을수 잇는가...를 우리는 이런 발상에서도 볼 수 잇습니다.

The policy of the ruling class in Britain and internationally remains that which was so bluntly stated by Johnson after being forced to agree to a second truncated lockdown late last year: “No more fucking lockdowns—let the bodies pile high in their thousands.”

Ending this catastrophic situation demands the independent political intervention of the working class.

The pandemic has claimed over 155,000 lives in Britain and officially over 4.5 million worldwide. The true figure is more than 10 million. None of this needed to happen. A properly conducted policy of lockdowns, involving the closure of schools and the maintenance of only socially necessary production, combined with the use of track and trace technology and scientifically approved personal protective equipment, could have successfully eliminated the virus before its spread worldwide and before the emergence of more deadly strains, especially with the development of vaccines.

이런 주장에 대한 반론도 만만쟎습니다...월남의 경우에서 어쩟던 결국은 한번은 격거야 하는 것 아니냐...는 생각도 하게 만듬니다.

이하의 내용은 트로츠키주의자들의 늘 반복되엇던 주장입니다..

Instead, apart from occasional and limited lockdowns, the virus was given almost free rein as the capitalist class prioritised private profit over public health.

The political allies of the banks and corporations stretched across the official political spectrum, with Johnson and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, Donald Trump and Joe Biden, and their counterparts internationally all united in opposition to the fundamental interests of working people and their families.

On August 20, the World Socialist Web Site issued a call for workers in every country to mount a strategic, life and death struggle for the eradication of COVID-19. We not only called for the rejection of the “herd immunity” agenda advanced by Johnson and his ilk, but also of policies limited to “mitigation” seeking only to limit the pandemic’s impact through vaccination, masking, social distancing and similar measures.

The rapid escalation and global spread of the highly infectious Delta variant have confirmed that “herd immunity” cannot be realised and that mitigation alone only allows the virus to spread, mutate and claim millions more lives. The WSWS concluded, “Therefore, the only viable strategy is eradication, based on the policies advanced by the foremost epidemiologists, virologists and other scientists throughout the pandemic. Eradication entails the universal deployment of every weapon in the arsenal of measures to combat COVID-19, coordinated on a global scale, to stamp out the virus once and for all.”

Eliminating COVID-19 demands a unified struggle by educators, parents, autoworkers, transport workers, logistics workers, health care workers and the entire working class internationally.

To this end, on August 22, the WSWS organised an online discussion, “ For a Global Strategy to Stop the Pandemic and Save Lives! ” The event brought together eminent scientists, Professor Michael Baker of the University of Otago, New Zealand; Dr. Malgorzata Gasperowicz of the University of Calgary, Canada; and Dr. Yaneer Bar-Yam from the New England Complex Systems Institute in the US, to explain the necessity of an elimination strategy, with teachers in the US, Brazil and Australia on the frontline of the fight against the criminal policies of the ruling elite. Also participating was Lisa Diaz, a parent opposed to sending her children into an unsafe school environment, whose description of the situation in the UK prompted Professor Baker to describe Johnson’s policies as a “barbaric experiment on the British people.”

The meeting provided workers and young people with a scientific approach to combating the pandemic. It advanced the necessary political perspective on which such a fight must be based, insisting that no limits must be placed on what is spent to eradicate COVID-19. The necessary resources must be taken from the fabulous wealth hoarded by the banks, major corporations and the super-rich and put to the service of humanity. This is the perspective that must now be taken up by millions the world over.

[여플떼기]

인구가 6백만쯤 된다네요
80프로 정도 접종 완료를 햇고요....
우리도 접종률 그정도 되면 그리 할수 밖에 없지 않을까 합니다..