노무현교 환자들에게 김건희....자유 민주주의자들에게 짱꼴라..........참 심각한 정신질환

[다른소리]

https://v.daum.net/v/20221128091550755

김건희 여사 만났던 캄보디아 소년, 서울아산병원서 수술 받는다

이 기사를 일고....즉각  생각햇지요..

김머준이 이런것 그냥 둿겟냐??.........노무현교 쥐쇄끼들 또 거품 처 물고 뒤집어졋겟다......싶엇지요.

추천해요12좋아요79감동이에요16화나요401슬퍼요1

절대 기대를 저버리지 않습니다.

뭐가 그리 화가날까요??..

노무현교 쥐쇄끼들에게  김건희는 주식이라고 햇지요??

김건희 , 윤성열 없으면 이 쥐쇄끼들은 굶어 되집니다.

그것이 무엇이던 반드시 정치화 되고...독팍 쇗끼들이 선발대로 기어 나와서니...해골이 깨질때 까지 치고 박고 하지요..

아 또......행여 오해들은 마시라..

다른소리도 저딴 사진질 ....우선 감성적으로 싫고....

성열이 건희 따윈 사람취급도 안 한다....

다른소리에게 ...니들이나 그들이나 꼭 같어 그런데..

솔까....니들 지뤌질이 더 역겨워....

이 아뭄뫄가... 저 소년 서울로 불러와 수술하게 하는 역할을 햇다면..

노무현교 쥐쇄끼들은 온갖 미사여구를 다 동원하여..........우리 요솨님...취지지지ㅣㅣㅣ.....개 욤병질들을 떨엇딧을 것이며

저 옷 팔아서 수술비 대라고 .........차마 말 하진 않앗을 것 아니더냐??.........응??

니들은 ...

다른소리가 평생을 살면서 격겨본 종들중에서 가장 악질적인 종들이쉬다........

정말 소름끼치게 싫어...

•  
•  
•  
• • 과거순
  • 최신순
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  

이런 정신질환은 치료도 않되는데...........참 걱정이야....진짜..

살아 오면서.....

지금 만큼 우리사회에서 감정이 파괴적이고 제어없이 표출 된 때가 잇엇는가 시포..

다른소리가 격겨본 사람들 중에서 노무현교 똥파리때들(+ 갱상도) 만큼 철쩌하게 악질적인 종들이 잇엇는가 싶고..

수구 꼴통들??........

내가 수구 꼴통이엿쓰니....쬐금은 알지.....

야들 노무현교 꼴통들 보다는 그래도 나아.........도진개진 차이랄 것도 없지만 

https://www.rt.com/news/567275-china-lockdown-protests-shanghai/

Anti-lockdown protests break out in China (VIDEOS)

노무현교 똥파리 때들에게  윤씨 김씨가 반드시 악귀여야 하듯이

자유 민주주의자(헤요.....무슨 개 지뤌리랴) 들에게 짱꼴라도 반드시 악귀여야 한다고 햇지요??

그것이 무엇이던 짱꼴라에 대한 것은 다.....정치화되고 ...아가리가 깨지도록 깽깽거립니다..

차이가 잇다면 ...

짱꼴라는 정상인데 ...비 정상들이 그 정상인 꼴을 못 견디는 것이고

노무현교 똥파리때들이나 수구 꼴통들은 꼭 같은 비 정상인데, 갈보와 화냥년 정도의 차이로 해골이 깨지게 싸운다는 것이지..

이런것은 어쩟던 대단한 정신질환이다는 것이고.....그래서 걱정되.......

한겨레

“코로나 봉쇄 그만” 중국 곳곳 시위…'위험한 구호'도 등장

3시간 전

中 “시진핑-공산당 퇴진” 구호까지… 코로나봉쇄 반발 확산

7시간 전

---

뉴시스

'시진핑 물러나라!' 제로 코로나 항의 시위 중국 전역으로 확산

17분 전

백악관 뉴스

YTN

美백악관 코로나19 조정관 "中 제로코로나 정책은 비현실적"

5시간 전

미 백악관 코로나19 조정관 "중국 '제로 코로나', 비현실적"

2시간 전

관련 뉴스

https://coronaboard.kr/

코로나19(COVID-19) 실시간 상황판

이들이 중국에 대고 .....저런 말을 할 수 잇는지 모르겟습니다..

이런 것은 너무 뻔뻔한것 아닙니까??

아래는 wsws의 중국의 코로나에 대한 글입니다..

wsws가 중국 당국의 제로 코로나 정책의 완화를 비판하는 글을 이미 올렷습니다..

이들은 인민들의 생명 하나가 경제를 돌리는것 보다 더 중요하다고 생각하는 사람들입니다.

짱꼴라가 뭔짓을 하던 사냥질만 해야만 하는 서구언론들과는 전혀 다른 시각과 비판을 내고 잇습니다.

다른의견이나 비판이야 얼마든지 갖을 수 잇습니다...

그런데 경우가 맞아야지요.....그래야 들어 주고 고민도 해 보게 하는 것이지..

거리에 사람 몇명만 모여 잇써도......중국공산당 붕괴 한다....식으로 씨불리면...

-기머준이 사료 던줘졋는갑다...노무현교 쥐쇗끼들 또  취지지지지 거린다........생각하고 침 한번 뱉고 말지요.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/11/26/chin-n26.html

China tallies three consecutive days of record COVID-19 infections

China tallies three consecutive days of record COVID-19 infections

Benjamin Mateus

25 November 2022

•  

On Thursday, Friday and Saturday, China’s National Health Commission (NHC) reported three consecutive record numbers of COVID-19 infections, 32,943, 31,656, and 35,183, respectively.(3만명 환자 속출 .....한국은 하루 50만명도 나왓는디...우린 선진 방역이고 중국은 나라가 망하는 중이다???...) The outbreak is the most geographically widespread to date, with five provinces—Guangdong, Chongqing, Beijing, Sichuan and Hebei—reporting over 1,000 daily new cases on Friday and Saturday, and eight other provinces reporting over 500 new cases.

[Photo by Our World In Data / CC BY 4.0]

Guangdong province in the Southeast is at the epicenter of the current outbreak, with 8,476 COVID cases reported Friday, followed by Chongqing with 6,500, Hebei with 3,375, Beijing with 1,860, and Sichuan with 1,310.

Rather than implementing full-scale lockdowns and mass testing of the population to bring the rapid, multi-city rise in cases under control, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is waffling and demonstrably unsure of how to proceed as they employ halfhearted mitigation measures by way of reaction rather than a more deeply considered public health approach.

For instance, the five-day lockdown in Guangzhou’s most populous district of Baiyun will do little to stem the tide of infections. It will promote locals’ distrust and suspicion of public health authorities and exacerbate future efforts to implement infection controls. Implementing the Zero-COVID measures necessary to save lives and well-being requires a whole-of-society approach based on clear communication and the deployment of resources to protect the population.

In Chongqing, resources are already being overwhelmed, with the region’s 41,000 quarantine beds already filled with patients. The Deputy Director of the Chongqing Health Commission told reporters that the municipality is hurrying to construct new facilities that can hold close to 50,000 more people, with over 5,000 construction workers now laboring around the clock to complete the centers in five days.

In China’s capital city of Beijing, health authorities have shifted to haphazardly introducing modified lockdown measures, causing disarray and panic across the sprawling urban center of more than 22 million people. Health authorities are asking residents to voluntarily stay in their apartment compounds for a few days, while the number of businesses being forced to close their activities is growing.

Panic buying has once again left many supermarket shelves empty as families try to stock their pantries, unsure if the measures being implemented will take on a protracted character. Improvised quarantine centers and field hospitals are now under construction, while many schools have shifted to online classes.

The current surge in cases across China proves that attempting to compromise with the Zero-COVID public health stance can only lead to disastrous results.

The bankrupt “Twenty Articles,” which attempt to balance economic prerogatives with the relaxation of public health measures at the core of Zero-COVID, was a doomed strategy at its conception. This is quickly being demonstrated on a day-to-day basis as COVID-19 infections continue to spread along with protests and opposition to the relaxations of pandemic measures.

As one resident in Shijiazhuang wrote on social media after authorities canceled regular PCR testing, “It is absurd and irresponsible to suddenly relax all measures when the number of infections is rising rapidly. This is by no means scientific.”

There is growing mistrust of health authorities attempting to downplay the risks of infections and shifting the burden of responsibility onto individuals, while at the same time claiming they are not relaxing Zero-COVID.

To place the current public health crises in perspective, vaccination rates must be assessed.

According to Our World in Data, an astounding 1.27 billion people (89 percent of China’s population) have completed the initial two-dose vaccine protocol. Around 3.44 billion COVID-19 vaccines have been administered since the vaccination campaign began. However, China had delivered 3.3 billion vaccines by April 12, 2022, meaning that nearly the entire population received their last dose more than seven months ago.

[Photo by Our World In Data / CC BY 4.0]

As of November 24, 2022, cumulative COVID-19 cases in China have reached a mere 1.38 million, the lowest per capita infection rate of any country with over 1 million population. Given that China is home to 1.412 billion people, only 0.1 percent of the population has been previously infected and 99.9 remain immunologically naive from prior infection.

A recent study found that the current iteration of Omicron subvariants demonstrate near complete immune evasion against antibodies generated by people who received at least three doses of the Sinovac COVID vaccine, the most common vaccine in China, meaning that virtually the entire Chinese population is at risk of infection with COVID-19. Sinovac has also been shown to provide less protection against hospitalization and death than mRNA vaccines.

The situation is most precarious for the elderly. According to data from Statista, by mid-March 2022 only 51 percent of Chinese people 80 years and older had completed their initial vaccine series and only 20 percent had received a third dose. For the 70-79 age bracket, 82 percent had completed their two-dose series and less than half were boosted, while those in the 60-69 age bracket were only slightly better off. In an article Friday, the Washington Post noted, “Just 40 percent of Chinese older than 80 have received a booster shot,” adding, “Among people older than 60, two-thirds have gotten a booster.”

The increasingly precarious situation in China is viewed as a positive good by the imperialist powers and their corporate media, which have continuously demanded the lifting of Zero-COVID in order to fully restore capitalist production and the exploitation of the Chinese working class.

The same Post article begins by stating, “A coronavirus outbreak on the verge of being China’s biggest of the pandemic has exposed a critical flaw in Beijing’s ‘zero COVID’ strategy: a vast population without natural immunity. After months with only occasional hot spots in the country, most of its 1.4 billion people have never been exposed to the virus.”

They chide the Chinese authorities for prioritizing containment and elimination over diverting resources to building their health care system and developing their intensive care capacity, while having the audacity to promote the reactionary, unscientific claim that China would have done well to allow a “degree of community transmission” to raise population immunity. This is, in essence, the “Focused Protection” nonsense of the Great Barrington Declaration.

Viral evolution towards more immune-evading and contagious strains has proven again and again the bankruptcy of the “herd immunity” policy which the Post and the financial markets now demand be adopted in China. This criminal policy has led to the deaths of over 20 million people across the globe, including over 1.1 million just in the United States. It is a public health policy which is best described as “social murder” and the “normalization of death.”

The experience in Hong Kong in February is a stark reminder of the impact that a tsunami of COVID-19 infections will have on the population if China’s public health initiatives completely collapse. A modeling study published in the journal Nature in May looked at various mitigation scenarios if Zero-COVID was lifted, and found that hospitals and ICUs would be overwhelmed for several weeks. In a worst-case scenario, approximately 1.55 million people could perish, afflicting primarily the oldest and least vaccinated.

Nomura economist Lu Ting warned, “When the infection number quickly soars, it will be a big blow to the health care system, and the whole society. Large-scale infections will have a negative impact across consumption, production, and logistics.”

Goldman Sachs economists have estimated China will completely reopen by second quarter of next year if not sooner, writing, “The Chinese economy is likely a distinct ‘two halves’ next year, as the initial stage of China’s reopening may be negative to growth, with COVID cases surging and population mobility temporarily declining—similar to the reopening experiences of several other East Asian economies.”

However, Zhang Zhiwei, chief economist at Pinpoint Asset management, offered an alternative hypothesis. He said, “If [the exit from zero-COVID] is relatively slow, or the policy goes back and forth, there is a huge question mark over whether an economic recovery will be achieved in the second half.”

This week, Jörg Wuttke, president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, wrote a letter to Beijing’s acting mayor Yin Yong demanding to know why the city has implemented a limited partial lockdown. He wrote, “A lack of adequate preparation has resulted in district governments and/or communities managing the recent outbreak in the same way as they did previously, by locking down businesses—with several having been mandatorily closed despite not being in a high-risk area—residences and other public venues.”

He then threatened, “This is very concerning, given that Shanghai’s experience from earlier this year has shown that after long-term lockdowns, many foreign nationals are likely to leave China. This would be detrimental to Beijing’s goal of developing into an international city.”

While the financial elite demand that China lift Zero-COVID in one fell swoop, the CCP seeks to do so more gradually. Under either scenario, the impacts of the abandonment of Zero-COVID on the health of the Chinese working class would be catastrophic and must be opposed.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

상식적으로 생각햇쓰면 좋겟습니다......상식...

미처 날뛰지들 말고....

건희가 쇼 한번 햇구나.............정도로 그냥 한번 보고 침 한번 뱉고 넘어가시라고

꼭 같이 마찬가지로...

중국 제로 방역도 완벽한 것은 아니구나......정도로 이해 하고 넘어 가시면 될것같어..

1백만명이 넘게 죽은 놈들이 ...짱꼴라 방역이 문제라고 악악거리지 말고....

그것도 민주주의니...인권이니 ..황당무개한 개 소리로........응???