|
Brian Lamacrafthttps://medium.com/thoughts-economics-politics-sustainability/pros-and-cons-of-universal-basic-income-d7bd11b5864f
One of the good things about a universal basic income system is it helps to eliminate poverty for the most part. It gives people enough money for their basic needs and necessities. They would still have to watch how much they spend, but their basic requirements for a living would be looked after by this income. This would be a positive thing, and it would help a lot of people that are struggling in their life. Poverty can be immensely draining on someone, and it doesn’t allow them to do anything else with their life because they are struggling just to make money.
While there are people living in poverty that are struggling, there are people living in poverty that have chosen to be in poverty. They don’t want to work, and they don’t want to contribute to society. They may also have problems such as drug abuse, and they are not looking for help. If we give people money that they don’t want to work, they’re not going to contribute anything to society. They would end up spending that money on drugs, alcohol, and other things. In fact, it puts a drain on society as we have to look after these people in hospitals when they overdose. I am not too fond of giving people that are drug abusers a universal basic income so they can spend their money on drugs.
Some people argue that a universal basic income gives people the incentive to do the jobs that they want to do and not the ones that they have to do. When you have to make a living normally, you have to take jobs that you don’t necessarily like. This is because you need the income, and if you don’t work, you’re going to starve to death. Some argue that if you have enough money to look after yourself, you’re going to be more inclined to do work that you actually enjoy. For example, you might start up a business and do something that you have always dreamed of. You can’t do this normally because your income doesn’t allow you to do it. You are stuck in the same dead-end job and have to struggle for your income.
While normal working people would probably take the money from UBI and spend it rationally, I have a problem with young people that are just starting out in the labor force getting a universal basic income. I know that when I was a young person if I was given money for doing nothing, I would be spending it on beer, pizza, movies, and concerts. I would not be thinking of going to my local job office looking for a job. Why should I look for a job when I’ve already been giving money from the government? I have no incentive to go looking for a job because I already have my basic needs looks after. I could get together with a few of my buddies, rent a place, and have tons of money left over for parties. There is no incentive for me to go out and get the job. I already have money given to me, so why should I even work at all?
If someone has a universal basic income, they might be able to save some of that income or invest it. They would probably have extra income left over if they had a job that they could put into savings or pay off some of their bills. This is actually a great idea, and it would help people have money left over for emergencies. A lot of people today that is working don’t have any money whatsoever for emergencies because they live paycheck to paycheck. If they don’t get that paycheck, they have no money to pay for their bills.
When you are just given money, you might not be inclined to save it. You might be more inclined to simply spend it on things you don’t need. I know if I was given money as a young person, I’d be more inclined to spend it on the stupid things because I haven’t learned the value of a dollar. When you are working and earning money, you tend to understand what your money is capable of doing for you. If you spend it wisely, you can still save some of it. When someone is just giving money, they don’t learn the value of money. They will just have money handed to them each month, and they won’t have to actually work for that money. They may tend to be lazy and spend it on things they don’t need and not have any savings.
The future is changing a lot, and it’s not a future that I’m really looking forward to. Many of the jobs that we take for granted today are going to be gone in the future due to artificial intelligence, robotics, and other technology. I’m not too sure if we’re going to be able to replace those jobs with anything that is meaningful. There may be a whole lot of people that are unable to make any money whatsoever because all of the basic jobs are taken away.
Not everyone is able to learn high technology skills. Not everyone is able to go to school and learn at a high level so they can take on jobs that are going to pay them a lot of money. In the past, we had manufacturing jobs and other jobs that didn’t take a whole lot of intelligence. You didn’t need a good education to do many of these jobs. As long as you had a bit of skill with your hands, you could make a lot of money and support your family. In the future, all of these jobs are going to be gone. They are going to be taken by robots, and there will be no need for people with these sorts of skills.
If this is the case, universal basic income will be the only way for people who have a lack of skill can make a living. All the other jobs will be taken by robots or artificial intelligence. There will be no servers, no tellers, no truck drivers, and no other basic jobs. This is because they will be taken over by technology. We have to figure out a way how all of these people are going to make a living.
2 Major Views on UBI
2. As people are no longer forced to perform menial and repetitive tasks to ensure their existence, we will see a boost of creativity, entrepreneurship and true self-care
While I am a strong adherent of the 2nd approach the discussion on UBI deserves more attention and thought.
The only way to pull ourselves from the rat race is to change the rules of the game. Robotics and AGI will be the ultimate game-changers.
We can argue that the things we are passionate about are very rarely well paid. This is a perfect argument for people unwilling to take the risk. In reality, however, we are simply clinging to our safe havens of a working wage.
Looks like Scandinavian countries are paving the way for this new social order. Shorter work week, perfect healthcare, high pensions and a great welfare system is not science fiction anymore. It is a Scandinavian reality.
It looks like being burnt out is not a necessary precondition to building a successful career or a successful state. America inflicted capitalism is not the universal answer to our pursuit after all.
Why are we forced to believe people need a goal in life, motivation, self-fulfillment and taking pride in their work? Because this is what we are taught to believe; this is what keeps our social order stable.
People are constantly fed the idea of a doomed society in case UBI gets implemented. What can happen instead is the “Scandinavization” of the society, achievement of greater equality and higher standards of living.
America fought its way to the values dominance by an exhaustive war and a smartly implemented Marshall Plan. Scandinavia is pushing its model purely by the power of example.
All that’s left for the world is to evaluate and make a choice.
The discussion on UBI pros and cons can go on as long as we please. The beauty of the concept is the possibility of it happening without our involvement or consent.
Modern separatists’ movements will find a new boost with the increased automation of production. Being a part of big state or coping on your own might mean the difference between enjoying free money and having to struggle to compete with robotics.
|