침묵은 깨기 위해 존재 하는 것이다???

[다른소리]

존 필러의 글입니다..

-모든 것을 다 의심해 보아라..........로사 룩셈부르크..

아마도....로사가 살앗던 그 세상도 ..지금 우리가 보고 잇는 세상 만큼이나 로사에게는 억망으로 보엿던가 봅니다.

눈에 보이는 숨 막치는 시위나 폭력이 없다 뿐이지

읽고 보고 듣고 잇는 모든것에....이미 어떤 목적을 가지고 너무 많은 조작과  선전 음모로 만들어지기 때문에

도데체 그것이 무엇인지 ...잘 보이지도 않을 뿐더러....

정 반대로 엉뚱하게 인식이 되고 ..끊임없는 혼란을 만들어 내고 잇다는 것은

오히려 로사의 시대 보다 더 헤처나가기 어렵게 느낄 지경입니다..

팔짜가 ...그런 시대를 살게 태어 낫쓰니.....그걸 어떡 합니까??

찾아 봐야지요..

무엇이 진실인지...눈이라도 끔먹 거려봐야...눈 뜨고 코가 베어지는 꼴은 면 할 수 잇을 것 아닙니까??

 눈 뜨고 코 베어가는 세상....

https://consortiumnews.com/2023/05/01/john-pilger-the-coming-war-time-to-speak-up/

John Pilger: The Coming War — Time to Speak Up

The Coming War — Time to Speak Up

May 1, 2023

Silences filled with a consensus of propaganda contaminate almost everything we read, see and hear. War by media is now a key task of so-called mainstream journalism.  

Dec. 20, 2008: Protesters in Montreal threw shoes at a target poster of President George Bush outside the U.S. Consulate to show support for the Iraqi journalist Muntadar al-Zeizi , who threw his shoe at the real Bush. (Anirudh Koul, Flickr, CC BY-NC 2.0)

조지 부시에 신발을 던지고 잇는 Muntadar al-Zeizi ....

조시 부시가 일으킨 전쟁으로 100만명의 이락인이 죽엇다.

노무현의 식솔들과 그 100만명의 무고한 이락 인민들을 날려 버린  살인마 조시 부시와의 ....너무나....너무나 행복해 보이는 행진..

노무현이란 한국의 대통령과 그 식솔들의 저런 작태를 이락인들이 알게 된다면....그들은 어떤 반응을 내 놓을까?

한국인들의 일본에 대한 그 질기고 질긴 사죄요구는 아무리 생각해 봐도 역겹다...

구역질이 나...

행여 혹겨 또 오해는 마시라....일본놈들의 식민 통치가 잘 한 짓이다는 말은 아니니..

말 꼬틀이 잡아 만들어...개 용병질  처 하지 마시라고......씨발놈드라..

By John Pilger

In 1935, the Congress of American Writers(미국작가회의) was held in New York City, followed by another two years later. They called on “the hundreds of poets, novelists, dramatists, critics, short story writers and journalists” to discuss the “rapid crumbling of capitalism” and the beckoning of another war. They were electric events which, according to one account, were attended by 3,500 members of the public with more than a thousand turned away. 

Arthur Miller, Myra Page, Lillian Hellman, Dashiell Hammett warned that fascism was rising, often disguised, and the responsibility lay with writers and journalists to speak out. Telegrams of support from Thomas Mann, John Steinbeck, Ernest Hemingway, C Day Lewis, Upton Sinclair and Albert Einstein were read out. 

The journalist and novelist Martha Gellhorn spoke up for the homeless and unemployed, and “all of us under the shadow of violent great power.” 

헤밍웨이와 Martha Gellhorn(헤밍웨이의 3번째 부인) 

Martha, who became a close friend, told me later over her customary glass of Famous Grouse and soda:

Her words echo across the silences today: they are silences filled with a consensus of propaganda that contaminates almost everything we read, see and hear.  Let me give you one example: 

On March 7, the two oldest newspapers in Australia, the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, published several pages on “the looming threat” of China. They coloured the Pacific Ocean red. Chinese eyes were martial, on the march and menacing. The Yellow Peril was about to fall down as if by the weight of gravity.

No logical reason was given for an attack on Australia by China. A “panel of experts” presented no credible evidence: one of them is a former director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a front for the Defence Department in Canberra, the Pentagon in Washington, the governments of Britain, Japan and Taiwan and the West’s war industry.

“Beijing could strike within three years,” they warned. “We are not ready.” Billions of dollars are to be spent on American nuclear submarines, but that, it seems, is not enough.”‘Australia’s holiday from history is over”: whatever that might mean. 

-중국이 3년안에 호주를 공격할 것이다.

우리로 치면 조선일보와 동아일보가  일면 헤드라인으로 ..북한의 서울 핵 공격이 임박 햇다...라고 도배를 해 버린 것이라 생각하면 될 것 같습니다.

이게 뭔 개 소리냐고요??....

중요한 것은 이런 것의 얼마나 합리적이고 현실적인 주장인가 따위가 아닙니다.

중국이 호주를 공격한다면 하는 것입니다...이미 이것은 움직일 수 없는 사실로 만들어 버린다는 것이지요.

-이게 뭔 개소리냐....는 말이 나가는 순간.....그는 빨갱이, 마오주의자파,중국의 스파이, 제5열 동양인...그런 사냥질을 당 하게 되지요.

-3년안에 혜성이 날아와 지구와 출동하고....인류는 괘멸 한다.......할렐루야...

그렇다면 열씸히 교회에 돈 갖다 받치고 존나게 천당가게 해 달라고 기도나 처 해야 하는 것이지

-뭔 개 소리냐....말을 하면 그 순간에 사탄이 씨운자...이교도의 악마...하느님의 섭리를 거역하는 자....가 되는 원리와 같은 것이지요.

문제는....

이런 개 소리가 ...당연히 무시 되는 개소리가 아닌, 심각하고 진솔한 국가 안보에 대한 살 떨리는 제안으로 그 사회에서서 너무 쉽게 인정되고 너무 쉽게 기본적인 인식이 된다는 것이지요..

-북한이 미국의 도시 한 두개 정도 핵으로 공격한다고 으름짱을 놓앗을때....

-미국이 자신들의 도시의 파괴를 감내 하고도 북한에 대해 핵으로 보복 공격을 해 준다는 보장이 잇느냐???...

-개 소리다 ..한국도 핵 무장을 해야 한다..핵 개발이 불 가능 하다면 최소 핵 공유 정도는 치고 나가야 ...

-국가의 안보가 보장되는 것이다...

이런 개 소리가 ..2023년 5월2일 현재 대한민국 대통령의 인식입니다.

꼭 같습니다....

중국이 3년안에 핵으로 호주를 공격할 것이다.....옹알 옹알 옹알..

에효...

이 찌지리는 똥 오줌을 못 가리고 ...이런 찌질한 상상력을 미국앞에서 한껀 나발 거렷습니다.

미국은 성열이와 그 븅쉰쇗끼들의  이런 개소리에 대해 또 다시 분명한 답변을 하엿습니다..

-사실상의 핵 공유 느낌? 심리적 핵공유의 안전감?

-개 소리 하지 마라..

-쐐끼들이 눈치가 없써

-핵의 사용권과 통제권은 오로지 미국만 같는다...찌그러저...씨발놈드라..

서울대 나온놈이 마누라 의심하기 시작하면....방법이 없다고 햇지요??

이런것은  말짱한 지 마누라가 기어코 딴놈 죶을 빨아야 끝이 납니다..

성열이도 서울대 나왓다고 하지요??....별로 영리해 보이지도 않구만...

야도 김정은이 기어코 핵으로 서울을 공격해야 끝이날 일이지요..

헤요 ...

어쩌다 이런 븅쉰쇗끼가 대통령에 까지 올라가는 지경에 왓는지..

There is no threat to Australia, none. The faraway “lucky” country has no enemies, least of all China, its largest trading partner. Yet China-bashing that draws on Australia’s long history of racism towards Asia has become something of a sport for the self-ordained “experts.” What do Chinese-Australians make of this? Many are confused and fearful. 

The authors of this grotesque piece of dog-whistling and obsequiousness to American power are Peter Hartcher and Matthew Knott, “national security reporters” I think they are called. I remember Hartcher from his Israeli government-paid jaunts. The other one, Knott, is a mouthpiece for the suits in Canberra.  Neither has ever seen a war zone and its extremes of human degradation and suffering.  

“How did it come to this?” Martha Gellhorn would say if she were here. “Where on earth are the voices saying no? Where is the comradeship?” 

Post-Modernism in Charge

The voices are heard in the samizdat of this website and others. In literature, the likes of John Steinbeck, Carson McCullers, George Orwell are obsolete. Post-modernism is in charge now. Liberalism has pulled up its political ladder. A once somnolent social democracy, Australia, has enacted a web of new laws protecting secretive, authoritarian power and preventing the right to know. Whistleblowers are outlaws, to be tried in secret. An especially sinister law bans “foreign interference” by those who work for foreign companies. What does this mean? 

Democracy is notional now;(민주주의는 이미 추상적인 것이 되어 버렷다) there is the all-powerful elite of the corporation merged with the state and the demands of “identity.” American admirals are paid thousands of dollars a day by the Australian tax payer for “advice.” Right across the West, our political imagination has been pacified by PR and distracted by the intrigues of corrupt, ultra low-rent politicians: a Boris Johnson or a Donald Trump or a Sleepy Joe or a Volodymyr Zelensky. 

No writers’ congress in 2023 worries about “crumbling capitalism” and the lethal provocations of “our” leaders. The most infamous of these, Tony Blair, a prima facie criminal under the Nuremberg Standard, is free and rich. Julian Assange, who dared journalists to prove their readers had a right to know, is in his second decade of incarceration.

The rise of fascism in Europe is uncontroversial. Or “neo-Nazism” or “extreme nationalism,” as you prefer.

(한국의 민족주의 광기...토착왜구 사냥질 이라고 다르지 않습니다...

친일 수구 꼴통들도 문제지만,,오히려 진보와 민족주의로 포장한 극우 파시즘 세력의 사회에 대한 위협도 만만쟎습니다.....다른소리 시각에서는 노무현교 미츤개들이 수구 꼴통 할렐루야 부대 보다 더 위험하게 보입니다)

Ukraine as modern Europe’s fascist beehive has seen the re-emergence of the cult of Stepan Bandera, the passionate anti-Semite and mass murderer who lauded Hitler’s “Jewish policy,” which left 1.5 million Ukrainian Jews slaughtered. “We will lay your heads at Hitler’s feet,”(우리는 유태인놈들의 대가리를 히틋러의 발 아래 받치겟다) a Banderist pamphlet proclaimed to Ukrainian Jews. 

Stepan Bandera torchlight parade in Kiev, Jan. 1, 2020. (A1/Wikimedia Commons)

러시아가 우크라인을 침공한 것에 대해 동의하지 않습니다...

그렇다고 하여 우크라인이 자유와 평등, 인권을 존중하는 민주적인 나라 이고...러시아의 불법적인 공격을 당하여 영웅적인 투쟁을 하고 잇다.....는  개소리에도 또한 동의 하지 않습니다.

우리도 눈이 잇고 귀가 잇습니다..

거짓말은 절대 오래 가지 못 합니다.....

Today, Bandera is hero-worshipped in western Ukraine and scores of statues of him and his fellow-fascists have been paid for by the EU and the U.S., replacing those of Russian cultural giants and others who liberated Ukraine from the original Nazis. 

In 2014, neo Nazis played a key role in an American bankrolled coup against the elected president, Viktor Yanukovych, who was accused of being “pro-Moscow.” The coup regime included prominent “extreme nationalists” — Nazis in all but name. 

At first, this was reported at length by the BBC and the European and American media. In 2019, Time magazine featured the “white supremacist militias” active in Ukraine. NBC News reported, “Ukraine’s Nazi problem is real.” The immolation of trade unionists in Odessa was filmed and documented. 

Spearheaded by the Azov regiment, whose insignia, the “Wolfsangel,” was made infamous by the German SS, Ukraine’s military invaded the eastern, Russian-speaking Donbass region. According to the United Nations 14,000 in the east were killed. Seven years later, with the Minsk peace conferences sabotaged by the West, as Angela Merkel confessed,(메르켈 뿐만 아니고,,,프랑스 사회당 대통령이엇던 올렝도도 우크라인에게 전쟁을 준비할 시간을 벌어 주기 위해 민스크 협약을 통해  러시아를 속엿다고  말 햇습니다....그리고 이런 전쟁 준비는 개전이후  초반 전쟁에서 상당한 효과를 봣다는 것이 군사 전문가들의 의견입니다 ) the Red Army invaded.

A march of Azov veterans and supporters in Kiev, 2019. (Goo3, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)

This version of events was not reported in the West. To even utter it is to bring down abuse about being a “Putin apologist,” regardless whether the writer (such as myself) has condemned the Russian invasion. Understanding the extreme provocation that a NATO-armed borderland, Ukraine, the same borderland through which Hitler invaded, presented to Moscow, is anathema. 

Journalists who travelled to the Donbass were silenced or even hounded in their own country. German journalist Patrik Baab lost his job and a young German freelance reporter, Alina Lipp, had her bank account sequestered.

Silence of Intimidation 

In Britain, the silence of the liberal intelligentsia is the silence of intimidation. State-sponsored issues like Ukraine and Israel are to be avoided if you want to keep a campus job or a teaching tenure. What happened to former Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn in 2019 is repeated on campuses where opponents of apartheid Israel are casually smeared as anti-Semitic.

(이스라엘의 인종학살에 대한 비판은 반 유대주의자로 비판을 받는다....

영국 노동당사 최악의 선거 결과를 남긴  제레미 코빈도 이스라엘의 팔레스탄인인들의 학살에 대한 비판을 반 유대주의자 인종주의자로 비판을 받앗습니다....그 결과는 참담 하엿습니다...

지금의 영국 노동당에서 그 누구도 아스라엘의 가혹 행위에 대해  말을 하지 않습니다......

자라 보고 놀란 가슴 솥 뚜껑 보고 놀란 것이지요....

한국에서도 이런식의 정치적 공격은  이젠 표준이 되엇습니다..

노무현 비판해 ?...오 그래, 니 수구 꼴통이냐??...니 박그뇌 지지자냐??

박그뇌 비판해??....오 그래, 니 종북좌파냐?? 빨갱이냐??...니 개대중이 지지냐냐??.

모든것이 이런식입니다...

똥이 무섭기도 하지만,,,더러우니 피 하는 것이지요.

다른소린 ...수구꼴통 쥐쇗끼들 보다....노무현교 꼴통들이 정말로 진실로 더 싫습니다.

노무현교 꼴통+ 갱상도...............에휴.....상상도 하기 싫어..

난 노무현도 싫고 박그뇌도 싫다고 ....이 씨발놈들아..

난 갈보도 싫고 화냥년도 싫다고.........응....이 깨쐣끼드라..

Professor David Miller, ironically the country’s leading authority on modern propaganda, was sacked by Bristol University for suggesting publicly that Israel’s “assets” in Britain and its political lobbying exerted a disproportionate influence worldwide — a fact for which the evidence is voluminous. 

한국으로 치면...노무현 과 삼성 밀착관계를 이야기 햇다 하여....노무현교 교도들로 부터 십자 포화를 맞은 것으로 보면 되것습니다.

노무현의 거듭 되는 개 짓을 견디지 못하고.....계급장 때고 끝장 토론한번 해 보자.....고 햇다가

노무현교 쥐쇗끼때들로 부터 그야 말로 탈탈탈탈 오지게 여한없이 털려 버린 김근태..

노무현교 쥐쇄끼때들은 평생을 민주주의를 위해 살아왓던 이 사람에게...수구 꼴통 쇗끼 라는 레테르를 씨워...

원 없이 아작을 내 버렷다. 

David Miller...

The university hired a leading QC to investigate the case independently. His report exonerated Miller on the “important issue of academic freedom of expression‎” and found “Professor Miller’s comments did not constitute unlawful speech.” Yet Bristol sacked him. The message is clear: no matter what outrage it perpetrates, Israel has immunity and its critics are to be punished.

(노무현교 쥐쇗끼대들의 교주님의 성역화라고 생각 하면 됩니다..

이스라엘의 신성 불가침= 노무현 교주님의 신성 불가침)

A few years ago, Terry Eagleton, then professor of English literature at Manchester University, reckoned that “for the first time in two centuries, there is no eminent British poet, playwright or novelist prepared to question the foundations of the Western way of life.”

No Shelley spoke for the poor, no Blake for utopian dreams, no Byron damned the corruption of the ruling class, no Thomas Carlyle and John Ruskin revealed the moral disaster of capitalism. William Morris, Oscar Wilde, HG Wells, George Bernard Shaw had no equivalents today. Harold Pinter was alive then, “the last to raise his voice,” wrote Eagleton.

Terry Eagleton

Where did post-modernism — the rejection of actual politics and authentic dissent — come from?( 포스트 모던에 대한 비판에 관심 잇는 분 들은 다른 관련 서적을 참조 하시기 바랍니다..)  The publication in 1970 of Charles Reich’s bestselling book, The Greening of America, offers a clue.  America then was in a state of upheaval; Richard Nixon was in the White House, a civil resistance, known as “the movement,” had burst out of the margins of society in the midst of a war that touched almost everybody. In alliance with the civil rights movement, it presented the most serious challenge to Washington’s power for a century.

On the cover of Reich’s book were these words: “There is a revolution coming. It will not be like revolutions of the past. It will originate with the individual.”

At the time I was a correspondent in the United States and recall the overnight elevation to guru status of Reich, a young Yale academic. The New Yorker had sensationally serialised his book, whose message was that the “political action and truth-telling” of the 1960s had failed and only “culture and introspection” would change the world. It felt as if hippydom was claiming the consumer classes.  And in one sense it was.

Within a few years, the cult of “me-ism”(자기주의) had all but overwhelmed many people’s sense of acting together, of social justice and internationalism. Class, gender and race were separated. The personal was the political and the media was the message. Make money, it said. 

As for “the movement,” its hope and songs, the years of Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton put an end to all that. The police were now in open war with black people; Clinton’s notorious welfare bills broke world records in the number of mostly blacks they sent to jail.

George Floyd protesters in Miami react to police firing chemical irritants on May 30, 2020. (Mike Shaheen, CC BY 2.0, Wikimedia Commons)

When 9/11 happened, the fabrication of new “threats” on “America’s frontier” (as the Project for a New American Century called the world) completed the political disorientation of those who, 20 years earlier, would have formed a vehement opposition. 

In the years since, America has gone to war with the world. According to a largely ignored report by the Physicians for Social Responsibility, Physicians for Global Survival and the Nobel Prize-winning International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, the number killed in America’s “war on terror” was ‘at least’ 1.3 million in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan.

This figure does not include the dead of U.S.-led and fuelled wars in Yemen, Libya, Syria, Somalia and beyond. The true figure, said the report, “could well be in excess of 2 million [or] approximately 10 times greater than that of which the public, experts and decision makers are aware and [is] propagated by the media and major NGOS.” 

“At least” one million were killed in Iraq, say the physicians, or 5 percent of the population. 

다른소리가 만약에 서울대 입학면접관이엇다면...

조지 부시의 팔짱을 끼고 ...그리고 행복이 쩌러넘치는 행진을 하엿던 노무현 손녀에게 물어 봣을것 같아요..

-조지 부시가 일으킨 전쟁으로 최소 100만이 죽엇다...이는 이락인 인구 5%에 해당하는 숫자이고

-조지 부시가 전쟁의 명분으로 삼앗던 대량살상무기, 생물학전 폭탄은 아직까지도 발견되지 않앗다.

-당신이 만약에 미군의 폭격을 맞고 죽은 속절없이 죽어 버린 이락인 가족의 생존자 라면...조지 부시의 팔짱을 끼고 그리도 행복한 행진을 하고 잇는 당신에게 어떤 생각을 햇을 것 같은가??

아마도 노무현교 쥐쇗끼들은 이런 면접관을 기어코 찾아 내어 ,,,개 아작을 냇겟지요....

-서울대에 숨어 잇는 한 수구 꼴통 쥐쇗끼가...우리 교주님 손녀님을 욕 먹엿다...

-이 쥐쇗끼 반드시 잡아 족처서 

-처 먹은 뇌물이 뽀록나 억울하게 되지신 우리 교주님의 원한을 풀어 드리자..

No One Knows How Many Killed 

The enormity of this violence and suffering seems to have no place in the Western consciousness. “No one knows how many” is the media refrain. Blair and George W. Bush — and Straw and Cheney and Powell and Rumsfeld et al — were never in danger of prosecution. Blair’s propaganda maestro, Alistair Campbell, is celebrated as a “media personality.” 

In 2003, I filmed an interview in Washington with Charles Lewis, the acclaimed investigative journalist. We discussed the invasion of Iraq a few months earlier. I asked him, “What if the constitutionally freest media in the world had seriously challenged George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld and investigated their claims, instead of spreading what turned out to be crude propaganda?”

He replied. “If we journalists had done our job, there is a very, very good chance we would have not gone to war in Iraq.”

Charles Lewis

I put the same question to Dan Rather, the famous CBS anchor, who gave me the same answer.  David Rose of the Observer, who had promoted Saddam Hussein’s “threat,” and Rageh Omaar, then the BBC’s Iraq correspondent, gave me the same answer. Rose’s admirable contrition at having been “duped,” spoke for many reporters bereft of his courage to say so.

Their point is worth repeating. Had journalists done their job, had they questioned and investigated the propaganda instead of amplifying it, a million Iraqi men, women and children might be alive today; millions might not have fled their homes; the sectarian war between Sunni and Shia might not have ignited, and Islamic State (ISIS) imight not have existed. 

Mock coffins placed near the offices of military contractors during a protest against the Iraq war in and around Washington. March 21, 2009. (Victor Reinhart, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons)

Cast that truth across the rapacious wars since 1945 ignited by the United States and its “allies” and the conclusion is breathtaking. Is this ever raised in journalism schools? 

Today, war by media is a key task of so-called mainstream journalism, reminiscent of that described by a Nuremberg prosecutor in 1945:

“Before each major aggression, with some few exceptions based on expediency, they initiated a press campaign calculated to weaken their victims and to prepare the German people psychologically… In the propaganda system… it was the daily press and the radio that were the most important weapons.”

한국 전쟁 이전의 남한 언론도 꼭 같앗습니다..

전쟁이 일어나면 점심은 평양에서 먹고 저녁을 신의주에서 먹는다고 햇지요.

언론은 항상 ...전쟁의 앞잽이 엿고...항상 개소리만 씨불렷습니다.

이는 항상 역사이고  항상 FACT입니다.

One of the persistent strands in American political life is a cultish extremism that approaches fascism. Although Trump was credited with this, it was during Barack Obama’s two terms that American foreign policy flirted seriously with fascism. This was almost never reported. 

(다시 한번 정리 합시다....

트럼프는 민주당 지지자들의 생각만큼 파시스트도 아니고, 푸틴의 앵무새도 아니엇습니다....

오히려 진짜 파시스트는  입만 떨어지면 민주주의를 씨불 거렷던 민주당 자신들이엇고...버락 오바마는 민주당식 파시즘의 화신 이엇습니다...

다른소린 세월호 서명대에서,,,한 외국인 교수와 ...오바마와 노무현을 비교 하여, 진보라는 단어의 잘못된 이용, 두 정권의 폭력성,  지지자들의 이중성과 똘 근성등을 비교 하여 비판해 봣다고 햇지요??

-이런곳에서 이런 이야기를 나눌 것이라고는 생각하지 못햇다

-세월호의 진실 규명이 계속된다면 우리는 다시 한번 만나 더 깊은 이야기를 나눌 기회가 잇을 것이다..

그 사람은 그이후 지금까지 만나지 못 햇습니다....당연히 얼굴도 잊엇지요..

하지만 그 기억은 지금도 생생합니다.

여러분 들도 ..그런 이야기를 나누고 그들을 긴장하게 만들어 보시기 바랍니다.

“I believe in American exceptionalism with every fibre of my being,” said Obama, who expanded a favourite presidential pastime, bombing, and death squads known as “special operations” as no other president had done since the first Cold War.

According to a Council on Foreign Relations survey, in 2016 Obama dropped 26,171 bombs. That is 72 bombs every day. He bombed the poorest people and people of colour: in Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Iraq, Pakistan.

Every Tuesday — reported The New York Times — he personally selected those who would be murdered by hellfire missiles fired from drones. Weddings, funerals, shepherds were attacked, along with those attempting to collect the body parts festooning the “terrorist target.” 

A leading Republican senator, Lindsey Graham, estimated, approvingly, that Obama’s drones had killed 4,700 people. “Sometimes you hit innocent people and I hate that,” he said, but we’ve taken out some very senior members of Al Qaeda.’

In 2011, Obama told the media that the Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi was planning “genocide” against his own people. “We knew…,” he said, “that if we waited one more day, Benghazi, a city the size of Charlotte [North Carolina], could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.”

This was a lie. The only “threat” was the coming defeat of fanatical Islamists by Libyan government forces. With his plans for a revival of independent pan-Africanism, an African bank and African currency, all of it funded by Libyan oil, Gaddafi was cast as an enemy of Western colonialism on the continent in which Libya was the second most modern state. 

다른소린 오바마와 블레어가 때려 부셔 버린 리비아가 얼마나 대단한 복지체체와 주민 자치를 실천하고 잇엇는지를 글로 올려드렷습니다.

리비아는 아프리카 최고의 복지체제를 운영하고 잇엇고 리비아의 빈곤율은 전통적인 유럽 복지국가인 네델란드 보다 더 낮앗습니다..리비아 대학생의 반 이상이 여 학생들이엇고,,여성들의 사회생활 진출과 권리는 여느 서양국가 못지 않앗습니다.....당시 UN사무총장이엇던 반기문은 리비아의 이런 성취에 대해 표창을 준비 하고 잇엇습니다....

이런 나라가 오바마의 개 소리 한방에 날라가 버린 것입니다..

Destroying Gaddafi’s “threat” and his modern state was the aim. Backed by the U.S., Britain and France, NATO launched 9,700 sorties against Libya. A third were aimed at infrastructure and civilian targets, reported the UN. Uranium warheads were used; the cities of Misurata and Sirte were carpet-bombed. The Red Cross identified mass graves, and Unicef reported that “most [of the children killed] were under the age of ten.”

(야들이 지금 우크라인 전쟁에서 러시아에 대고  반 인륜적인 , 반 인권적인 전쟁을 하고 잇다고 열나게 열나게 나발 거리고 잇지요..

러시아의 파괴에 동의하는 것이 아니지만....야들의 이런 비난은 정말 구역질 납니다..

러시아는 전쟁 초장에 인프라에 대한 공격도 하지 않앗습니다...

그래서 미군전략가들이나 ..한국의 찌지리 전문가들로 부터 전쟁의 ABC도 모른다는 맹 비난을 받앗지요..

러시아가 인프라를 공격하기 시작하자 반 인륜적 전쟁이라고 악악거립니다..

한 없이 우크라인 빠라주기로 ....자신의 속내 모든것을 다 보여 버린 찌지리 김종대) 

When Hillary Clinton, Obama’s secretary of state, was told that Gaddafi had been captured by the insurrectionists and sodomised with a knife, she laughed and said to the camera: “We came, we saw, he died!” (왓노라. 보앗노라 .죽엿노라..) 

On 14 September 2016, the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee in London reported the conclusion of a year-long study into the NATO attack on Libya which it described as an “array of lies” — including the Benghazi massacre story.

The NATO bombing plunged Libya into a humanitarian disaster, killing thousands of people and displacing hundreds of thousands more, transforming Libya from the African country with the highest standard of living into a war-torn failed state.

영국의회의 이 보고서에서는, 리비아 전쟁은 얼마든지 피 할 수 잇는 전쟁이엇음을 천명하엿고..토니 블레어가 리바아 파괴전쟁의  책임자 임을 분명하게 하엿습니다

이 보고서는 여야 구분이 없이 작성된 영국의회의 최종 결론입니다..

Under Obama, the U.S. extended secret “special forces” operations to 138 countries, or 70 percent of the world’s population. The first African-American president launched what amounted to a full-scale invasion of Africa. 

Reminiscent of the Scramble for Africa in the 19th century, the U.S. African Command (Africom) has since built a network of supplicants among collaborative African regimes eager for American bribes and armaments. Africom’s “soldier to soldier” doctrine embeds U.S. officers at every level of command from general to warrant officer. Only pith helmets are missing.

It is as if Africa’s proud history of liberation, from Patrice Lumumba to Nelson Mandela, has been consigned to oblivion by a new white master’s black colonial elite. This elite’s “historic mission,” warned the knowing Frantz Fanon, is the promotion of “a capitalism rampant though camouflaged.”

In the year NATO invaded Libya, 2011, Obama announced what became known as the “pivot to Asia.” Almost two-thirds of U.S. naval forces would be transferred to the Asia-Pacific to “confront the threat from China,” in the words of his defence secretary. 

There was no threat from China; there was a threat to China from the United States; some 400 American military bases formed an arc along the rim of China’s industrial heartlands, which a Pentagon official described approvingly as a “noose.”

At the same time, Obama placed missiles in Eastern Europe aimed at Russia. It was the beatified recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize who increased spending on nuclear warheads to a level higher than that of any U.S. administration since the Cold War – having promised, in an emotional speech in the centre of Prague in 2009, to “help rid the world of nuclear weapons.” 

Obama and his administration knew full well that the coup his assistant secretary of state, Victoria Nuland, was sent to oversee against the government of Ukraine in 2014 would provoke a Russian response and probably lead to war. And so it has. 

이 글에서...오바마가 베네주엘라를  미국의 안보에 대한 심각한 위협이라고 선언한 거짓말은 적시 하지 않앗습니다.

베네주엘라는 미국 까지 도달 할 수 잇는 미사일 한방 갖고 잇지 못한 나라 이지만...졸지에 오바마에 의해 미국의 안보에 심각한 위협 국가가 되엇습니다.

미국의 자유언론 그 누구도...베네주엘라가 미국의 안보의 위협이 아니라고 반론하지 않앗습니다.

이런 언론의 자유는 아무런 근거도 없이  트럼프를 꼼짝없이 반 미치광이, 정신병자로 만들엇습니다.

트럼프가 좋은 것은 아니지만....이건 아니지요..

오바마는 그 어떤 미국의 대통령 보다도 많은 전쟁을 햇고,,,재임 기간동안 가장 긴 시간을 전쟁을 햇습니다..

그는 변화와 희망을 이야기 하여 권력을 잡앗고...미국 최초의 흑인 대통령이 되엇지만...

철쩌하게 월가 자본가들만을 위해 일 햇지요...그 만큼 받아 처 먹엇쓰니 배푼 것입니다.

오바마 8년 동안 미국의 기층 인민들의 삶이 좋아 졋다는 그 어떤 실증도 없습니다.

빈부 격차는 더 벌어졋고, 흑인들의 지위는 더 떨어졋습니다..

전쟁은 더 많아졋고 ..현기증 나는 군사예산을 마구 마구 썻습니다.

그는 철쩌한 수구 꼴통이엇고,,,미 제국주의,  군사주의, 예외주의의 화신 이엇습니다.

그럼에도 불구 하고 오바마는 진보적인 대통령, 민주적인 대통령이라는 거죽을 쓰고 잇습니다.

오바마의 이런 모습은 노무현과 너무 닮앗습니다..

사람사는 세상을 외치고 집권하여 ...사람만 처 잡는 세상을 만들고 

철쩌하게 삼성과 강남만을 위해 쌩 지뤌들 떨엇지요....

그럼에도 불구하고 똘들이 몰여드는 것도  닮앗습니다...

똘들이 참 지뤌 맞다는 것도  꼭 같습니다.

트럼프의 집권은 오바마의 이런 폭력과 파괴에 대한 반감에서 일어난 일이고,

이명박의 집권이 수구 꼴통 노무현의 닧짓에 대한 반감으로 일어난 것과 같습니다.

트럼프와 이명박이란 ...답이 아닌 답을 찾은 것도 같습니다.

그런 이야기를 ..그 대학교수와 죽 햇지요.

I am writing this on 30 April, the anniversary of the last day of the longest war of the 20th century, in Vietnam, which I reported. I was very young when I arrived in Saigon and I learned a great deal. I learned to recognise the distinctive drone of the engines of giant B-52s, which dropped their carnage from above the clouds and spared nothing and no one; I learned not to turn away when faced with a charred tree festooned with human parts; I learned to value kindness as never before; I learned that Joseph Heller was right in his masterly Catch-22: that war was not suited to sane people; and I learned about “our” propaganda.

Joseph Heller

All through that war, the propaganda said a victorious Vietnam would spread its communist disease to the rest of Asia, allowing the Great Yellow Peril to its north to sweep down. Countries would fall like “dominoes.”

도미노 효과는 실제 공산주의 확산에서는 일어나지 않앗습니다...오히려 민주주의 확산에서 많이 관찰 되엇지요.

1848년과 1968년 세계 혁명은 오히려 민주주의 확산의 도미노 효과입니다...공산주의 확산으로 보긴 어렵지요.

한국이 적화된다 하여 일본이 공산화 됩니까??...중국 대륙이 적화되엇는데 왜 대만은 아직까지 적화되지 않지요?

남미의 핑크 타이드도 도미도 이론 보다는 민주주의 확산으로 봐야 합니다.

80년대 말 1990년 대 초반의  소련과 동구권의  붕괴야 말로 진짜 도미노 이론이 잘 맞어 떨어진 경우이지요.

-이 쇗끼는 입만 떨어지면 다 거짓말이야..

Ho Chi Minh’s Vietnam was victorious, and none of the above happened. Instead, Vietnamese civilisation blossomed, remarkably, in spite of the price they paid: 3 million dead. The maimed, the deformed, the addicted, the poisoned, the lost.

If the current propagandists get their war with China, this will be a fraction of what is to come. Speak up.

다른소리가 말 햇지요.

서구 언론들의 중국에 대한 것은 다 거짓말이다...거꾸로 생각하면 된다.....고

다른소린 빈말 하지 않습니다..

미친개들의 개 소리 보단...사람의 소리를 들으세요..

John Pilger has twice won Britain’s highest award for journalism and has been International Reporter of the Year, News Reporter of the Year and Descriptive Writer of the Year. He has made 61 documentary films and has won an Emmy, a BAFTA and the Royal Television Society prize. His Cambodia Year Zero is named as one of the ten most important films of the 20th century. He can be contacted at www.johnpilger.com