Re:Assignment-answering two questions on the American liberalism

20172606 AD&PR Chawon Kim Q1. Which position would American conservatives and Liverals take in regard to environmental regulation, like charging taxes on a company that emits wates polluing the air and water? Conservaitves : Opposition Recognizing the need for an environmental tax, you may think there is a great deal of concern about the negative impact on the national economy, such as rising prices due to higher energy costs and the burden on industry as a whole. Because all industrialized countries are absolutely dependent on fossil fuels. I would like to stress that environmental taxes should be examined in a variety of ways, according to the circumstances of each country, such as not only their environmental impact but also their contribution to the improvement of the tax system and fiscal health. In addition to the level of application of environmental taxes by energy source, we ask you to make a decision on whether to apply the same energy source, depending on its use. Liberals : Agree Progressive forces will have to move further from their support to make as much environmental pollution as possible. Maybe we should call for equality to impose environmental taxes on all citizens, not just companies. They believe that environmental taxes are a type of CRS (corporate social responsibility), and the richer a company becomes, the more 낙수 효과 [Trickle-down effect, 落水效果] it will cause and contribute to the revitalization of the welfare of small and medium-sized enterprises and citizens. "Because environmental taxes make a country more ecological, we set environmental taxes because they help to make the company's image more environmentally friendly. My personal comment: Although many countries have agreed to create new taxes to protect the environment, it is unlikely to be easy to implement. France, which announced a review earlier this year that it would impose taxes on large trucks, mainly in Scandinavian countries such as Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and Denmark, as it undermines national competitiveness. However, the United States, which produces about 20 percent of the world's carbon dioxide emissions, has yet to be introduced. China, Japan and South Korea are also considering introducing a carbon tax. Human beings have come to bear the environmental tax, an unprecedented tax in exchange for destroying the environment. But I think the most important thing is our practice of protecting nature and the environment. If you continue to do work that pollutes the environment, you may have more scary things that money can't solve. We must carefully use the resources provided by nature to protect the environment. Q2. 1.Strict father marality 2. Nuturant mother morality Do you prefer the former orthe latter as your life philosophy? and as a type of government. I use the Nurturant mother's moral type as a philosophy of life. I believe this kind of face emphasizing liberalism and equality can make society richer." Everyone is equal. But equality loses its value if the environment conferred on the individual is low-level or undeveloped. For example, Africa cannot afford to claim equality and freedom in their environment. Liberal democracy is a concept that continues when the environment given to an individual is enriched. So, I think our government needs to take a sustainable attitude toward nurturing mothers. We can achieve democracy only when we invest in young people, underprivileged with taxes, small business people, and poor families, and give them equal opportunities. By the way, my role model is a famous American actor, Angelina Jolie. There is something she said when she went to volunteer in Africa. "Baby, you're not pathetic. Use it is of the future of this country. Younned help." As she said, we don't help poor people, we help them because they are the future of a country. We need to take "Nuturant Mother Morality" to get better people. ♠